the culture of poverty thesis argues that

• Subject List
• Take a Tour
• For Authors
• Subscriber Services
• Publications
• African American Studies
• African Studies
• American Literature

Anthropology

• Architecture Planning and Preservation
• Art History
• Atlantic History
• Biblical Studies
• British and Irish Literature
• Childhood Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Cinema and Media Studies
• Communication
• Criminology
• Environmental Science
• Evolutionary Biology
• International Law
• International Relations
• Islamic Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Latino Studies
• Linguistics
• Literary and Critical Theory
• Medieval Studies
• Military History
• Political Science
• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation
• Social Work
• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Culture of Poverty

Introduction.

• Media Sources
• Foundational Texts
• Empirical Evidence
• Informing Policy
• Early Criticisms
• Urban Ethnography/Neighborhood Studies
• Theoretical Refutations of the Culture of Poverty
• The Underclass
• Critiques of the “Underclass” Framework
• The New Poverty Studies
• Welfare Reform

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Ethnocentrism
• Public Sociocultural Anthropologies
• St. Clair Drake
• Urban Anthropology

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Landscape Archaeology
• Medical Activism
• Transhumance
• Find more forthcoming articles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Culture of Poverty by Dana-Ain Davis LAST REVIEWED: 11 January 2012 LAST MODIFIED: 11 January 2012 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0004

The term culture of poverty emerged in 1959 to explain why people were poor. The culture of poverty concept delineates factors associated with poor people’s behaviors, and argues that their values are distinguishable from members of the middle class. The persistence of poverty can presumably be explained by the reproduction of this “lifeway,” because the values that the poor have are passed down generationally. Initially the term was primarily applicable in Third World countries and in those nation-states in the early stages of industrialization. Culture of poverty proposed that approximately 20% of poor people are trapped in cycles of self-perpetuating behavior that caused poverty. More specifically, 70 behavioral traits or characteristics are identified with those who have a culture of poverty. These characteristics include weak ego structure, a sense of resignation and fatalism, strong present-time orientation, and confusion of sexual identification. Alternately, intellectual support has been found for various aspects of the culture of poverty concept and for criticisms leveled against the explanatory power of the framework. As it pertains to explaining poverty in US-based urban areas, ensuing research has focused on several areas, including the presentation of empirical evidence that identifies and explicates the absence, or presence, of some of the characteristics found among the poor. These include: social participation, pathological family structure, social isolation, and individual behavioral traits, among others. While the term did have its supporters, the degree of support varied. For example, some argued that while a culture of poverty did exist, the definition of culture was not adequate enough to use the framework effectively. The concept also had detractors, and, in fact, it has served to polarize poverty research scholars, practitioners, and policymakers. Some scholars find the concept ill-conceived because it is not empirically or politically contextualized. Others have found that the concept, which centers on individual behaviors, overlooks the interaction of behavior and structure. Still others claim that the urban-centric focus that came to be associated with the concept both subsumed the reality of poverty in urban areas and simultaneously racialized poverty as it became associated with African Americans.

A great number of journals address the subject of poverty, but none is specifically focused on the culture of poverty concept. Anthropology is far from the only, or even the primary, discipline to elaborate or critique the framework. Across disciplines, one will find the issue of poverty covered in a number of peer-reviewed/refereed journals, as well as those that are not peer-reviewed. Many of the journals are focused on policy and research, such as the Journal of Children and Poverty , the Journal of Poverty , and Poverty and Public Policy . However, other journals are more interdisciplinary, such as Race, Poverty, and the Environment and the Journal of Poverty and Social Justice . No anthropological journals are dedicated exclusively to the subject of poverty; however, major journals, such as Critique of Anthropology , American Anthropologist , Ethnology , and City and Society have each attended to poverty issues and culture of poverty debates over the years.

American Anthropologist .

This is the premier journal of the American Anthropological Association. The journal advances the association’s mission by publishing articles that add to, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge.

City and Society

This is the journal of the Society for Urban, National and Transnational/Global Anthropology, a section of the American Anthropological Association. The journal is intended to foster debate and conceptual development in urban, transnational anthropology.

Critique of Anthropology .

This is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the development of anthropology as a discipline that subjects social reality to critical analysis.

Ethnology .

This a quarterly journal devoted to offering a broad range of general cultural and social anthropology. It publishes only articles.

Journal of Children and Poverty .

This journal serves as a forum for research and policy initiatives in the areas of education, health and public policy, and the socioeconomic causes and effects of poverty.

Journal of Poverty .

This a quarterly journal dedicated to research on poverty that goes beyond narrow definitions of poverty based on thresholds. It takes the view that poverty is more than the lack of financial means; rather, it is a condition of inadequacy, lacking, and scarcity. Published by Haworth Press.

Journal of Poverty and Social Justice .

The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice covers poverty-related topics as they are connected to social justice located in the United Kingdom. Contributors include researchers, policy analysts, practitioners, and scholars. Published by the Policy Press.

Poverty and Public Policy: A Global Journal of Social Security, Income and Aide and Welfare .

This is a new global journal that began publishing in 2009. It publishes policy research on poverty, income distribution, and welfare. It begins with the assumption that progress is possible and policy has a role to play in alleviating global poverty. Published on behalf of the Policy Studies Organization.

Race, Poverty, and the Environment .

This twenty-year-old journal is concerned with social and environmental justice. When it was founded, the goal was to strengthen the connections between environmental groups, working people, poor people, and people of color.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Anthropology »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Africa, Anthropology of
• Agriculture
• Animal Cultures
• Animal Ritual
• Animal Sanctuaries
• Anorexia Nervosa
• Anthropocene, The
• Anthropological Activism and Visual Ethnography
• Anthropology and Education
• Anthropology and Theology
• Anthropology of Islam
• Anthropology of Kurdistan
• Anthropology of the Senses
• Anthrozoology
• Antiquity, Ethnography in
• Applied Anthropology
• Archaeobotany
• Archaeological Education
• Archaeologies of Sexuality
• Archaeology
• Archaeology and Museums
• Archaeology and Political Evolution
• Archaeology and Race
• Archaeology and the Body
• Archaeology, Gender and
• Archaeology, Global
• Archaeology, Historical
• Archaeology, Indigenous
• Archaeology of Childhood
• Archaeology of the Senses
• Art Museums
• Art/Aesthetics
• Autoethnography
• Bakhtin, Mikhail
• Bass, William M.
• Benedict, Ruth
• Binford, Lewis
• Bioarchaeology
• Biocultural Anthropology
• Biological and Physical Anthropology
• Biological Citizenship
• Boas, Franz
• Bone Histology
• Bureaucracy
• Business Anthropology
• Cargo Cults
• Charles Sanders Peirce and Anthropological Theory
• Christianity, Anthropology of
• Citizenship
• Class, Archaeology and
• Clinical Trials
• Cobb, William Montague
• Code-switching and Multilingualism
• Cognitive Anthropology
• Cole, Johnnetta
• Colonialism
• Commodities
• Consumerism
• Crapanzano, Vincent
• Cultural Heritage Presentation and Interpretation
• Cultural Heritage, Race and
• Cultural Materialism
• Cultural Relativism
• Cultural Resource Management
• Culture and Personality
• Culture, Popular
• Curatorship
• Cyber-Archaeology
• Dalit Studies
• Dance Ethnography
• de Heusch, Luc
• Deaccessioning
• Design, Anthropology and
• Digital Anthropology
• Disability and Deaf Studies and Anthropology
• Douglas, Mary
• Drake, St. Clair
• Durkheim and the Anthropology of Religion
• Economic Anthropology
• Embodied/Virtual Environments
• Emotion, Anthropology of
• Environmental Anthropology
• Environmental Justice and Indigeneity
• Ethnoarchaeology
• Ethnographic Documentary Production
• Ethnographic Films from Iran
• Ethnography
• Ethnography Apps and Games
• Ethnohistory and Historical Ethnography
• Ethnomusicology
• Ethnoscience
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E.
• Evolution, Cultural
• Evolutionary Cognitive Archaeology
• Evolutionary Theory
• Experimental Archaeology
• Federal Indian Law
• Feminist Anthropology
• Film, Ethnographic
• Forensic Anthropology
• Francophonie
• Frazer, Sir James George
• Geertz, Clifford
• Gender and Religion
• GIS and Archaeology
• Global Health
• Globalization
• Gluckman, Max
• Graphic Anthropology
• Haraway, Donna
• Healing and Religion
• Health and Social Stratification
• Health Policy, Anthropology of
• Heritage Language
• House Museums
• Human Adaptability
• Human Evolution
• Human Rights
• Human Rights Films
• Humanistic Anthropology
• Hurston, Zora Neale
• Identity Politics
• India, Masculinity, Identity
• Indigeneity
• Indigenous Boarding School Experiences
• Indigenous Economic Development
• Indigenous Media: Currents of Engagement
• Industrial Archaeology
• Institutions
• Interpretive Anthropology
• Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity
• Laboratories
• Language and Emotion
• Language and Law
• Language and Media
• Language and Race
• Language and Urban Place
• Language Contact and its Sociocultural Contexts, Anthropol...
• Language Ideology
• Language Socialization
• Leakey, Louis
• Legal Anthropology
• Legal Pluralism
• Levantine Archaeology
• Liberalism, Anthropology of
• Linguistic Anthropology
• Linguistic Relativity
• Linguistics, Historical
• Literary Anthropology
• Local Biologies
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude
• Malinowski, Bronisław
• Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, and Visual Anthropology
• Maritime Archaeology
• Material Culture
• Materiality
• Mathematical Anthropology
• Matriarchal Studies
• Mead, Margaret
• Media Anthropology
• Medical Anthropology
• Medical Technology and Technique
• Mediterranean
• Mendel, Gregor
• Mental Health and Illness
• Mesoamerican Archaeology
• Mexican Migration to the United States
• Militarism, Anthropology and
• Missionization
• Morgan, Lewis Henry
• Multimodal Ethnography
• Multispecies Ethnography
• Museum Anthropology
• Museum Education
• Museum Studies
• NAGPRA and Repatriation of Native American Human Remains a...
• Narrative in Sociocultural Studies of Language
• Nationalism
• Needham, Rodney
• Neoliberalism
• NGOs, Anthropology of
• Niche Construction
• Northwest Coast, The
• Oceania, Archaeology of
• Paleolithic Art
• Paleontology
• Performance Studies
• Performativity
• Perspectivism
• Philosophy of Museums
• Plantations
• Political Anthropology
• Postprocessual Archaeology
• Postsocialism
• Poverty, Culture of
• Primatology
• Primitivism and Race in Ethnographic Film: A Decolonial Re...
• Processual Archaeology
• Psycholinguistics
• Psychological Anthropology
• Public Archaeology
• Religion and Post-Socialism
• Religious Conversion
• Repatriation
• Reproductive and Maternal Health in Anthropology
• Reproductive Technologies
• Rhetoric Culture Theory
• Rural Anthropology
• Sahlins, Marshall
• Sapir, Edward
• Scandinavia
• Science Studies
• Secularization
• Settler Colonialism
• Sex Estimation
• Sign Language
• Skeletal Age Estimation
• Social Anthropology (British Tradition)
• Social Movements
• Socialization
• Society for Visual Anthropology, History of
• Socio-Cultural Approaches to the Anthropology of Reproduct...
• Sociolinguistics
• Sound Ethnography
• Space and Place
• Stable Isotopes
• Stan Brakhage and Ethnographic Praxis
• Structuralism
• Studying Up
• Sub-Saharan Africa, Democracy in
• Surrealism and Anthropology
• Technological Organization
• Trans Studies in Anthroplogy
• Transnationalism
• Tree-Ring Dating
• Turner, Edith L. B.
• Turner, Victor
• University Museums
• Virtual Ethnography
• Visual Anthropology
• Whorfian Hypothesis
• Willey, Gordon
• Wolf, Eric R.
• Writing Culture
• Youth Culture
• Zora Neale Hurston and Visual Anthropology
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [195.158.225.244]
• 195.158.225.244

Learn Anthropology

Username or Email Address

Remember Me Forgot Password?

A link to set a new password will be sent to your email address.

Your personal data will be used to support your experience throughout this website, to manage access to your account, and for other purposes described in our privacy policy .

Get New Password

Culture of Poverty

• Last Updated: Aug 10, 2023

The culture of poverty theory, first postulated by Oscar Lewis in the 1960s [1] , proposes that poverty is not solely an economic issue, but also a cultural one. According to this theory, the poor are not simply victims of economic circumstances but also maintain a set of values, beliefs, and behaviors that perpetuate their impoverished condition [2] .

Origins of the Culture of Poverty Theory

Oscar Lewis, an American anthropologist, introduced the culture of poverty theory in his ethnographic studies of Mexican and Puerto Rican families in the 1960s. Lewis argued that poverty is a subculture with its own structure and rationale, a way of life passed down from generation to generation along family lines [3] .

Key Features of the Culture of Poverty

According to Lewis, the culture of poverty is characterized by:

• A strong sense of fatalism, an acceptance of poverty as a chronic condition that will unlikely change.
• Little use of banks, more reliance on informal credit sources.
• Frequent interpersonal violence.
• Lower levels of participation in community organizations and voluntary associations [4] .

Criticisms of the Culture of Poverty Theory

The culture of poverty theory has been heavily criticized over the years. Critics argue that the theory tends to blame the victims of poverty for their situation, and that it ignores larger structural forces, such as discrimination, lack of opportunities, and the impact of macroeconomic factors.

Victim-Blaming Critique

Some social scientists argue that the culture of poverty theory blames the poor for their poverty. By attributing poverty to cultural values, the theory shifts the focus from systemic causes and towards individual and group behaviors.

Structural Critique

The structural critique emphasizes that poverty is primarily due to societal structures and economic systems. These critics point out the lack of equal opportunities, systematic discrimination, and macroeconomic factors such as unemployment rates and wage levels.

Empirical Evidence

Empirical evidence on the culture of poverty is mixed. Some studies provide support for certain aspects of the theory, while others contradict it.

The culture of poverty theory provides an interesting perspective on poverty and its persistence. However, the theory’s controversial nature, along with the diverse empirical evidence, suggests that poverty is a complex phenomenon with both cultural and structural dimensions. Policymakers should consider these complexities when designing programs to alleviate poverty.

[1] Lewis, O. (1966). “The culture of poverty”. Scientific American.

[2] Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). “Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty”. PublicAffairs.

[3] Lewis, O. (1966). “La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in The Culture of Poverty—San Juan and New York”. Random House.

[4] Stack, C. (1974). “All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black community”. Harper & Row.

Vasundhra, an anthropologist, embarks on a captivating journey to decode the enigmatic tapestry of human society. Fueled by an insatiable curiosity, she unravels the intricacies of social phenomena, immersing herself in the lived experiences of diverse cultures. Armed with an unwavering passion for understanding the very essence of our existence, Vasundhra fearlessly navigates the labyrinth of genetic and social complexities that shape our collective identity. Her recent publication unveils the story of the Ancient DNA field, illuminating the pervasive global North-South divide. With an irresistible blend of eloquence and scientific rigor, Vasundhra effortlessly captivates audiences, transporting them to the frontiers of anthropological exploration.

Newsletter Updates

Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

I accept the Privacy Policy

Related Posts

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Culture of Poverty: On Individual Choices and Infantilizing Bureaucracies

• First Online: 26 July 2018

Cite this chapter

• Joshua D. Phillips 3  

2390 Accesses

2 Citations

There is a contentious academic debate about the correlation between poverty and destructive social behaviors such as out-of-wedlock births, use of intoxicants, disregard for education, attitudes toward work, and even television viewing habits. This chapter will highlight some of the destructive individual behaviors that lead to a life of poverty on a microlevel. In addition, this chapter highlights some of the bureaucratic influences that perpetuate macro-systems that maintain enclaves of poverty, by making it difficult for the poor to make more constructive decisions that would alleviate their poverty. This research is not an attempt to malign the poor or to pompously critique those habits that contribute to generational poverty. Instead, this chapter looks to honestly assess these habits and their outcomes truthfully and dispassionately. Research indicates that poverty and cultural behaviors are intrinsically linked. Therefore, to address poverty, one must address these aspects of culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Strategies for Conducting Post-Culture-of-Poverty Research on Poverty, Meaning, and Behavior

Poverty: More Than Just a Lack of Material Resources?

Anomie and The Purge

Albelda, R. (2002). Fallacies of welfare-to-work policies. In R. Albelda & A. Withorn (Eds.), Lost ground: Welfare reform, poverty and beyond (pp. 79–94). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

Google Scholar  

Albelda, R., Folbre, N., & The Center for Popular Economics. (1996). The war on the poor: A defense manual . New York: The New Press.

Albelda, R., & Tilly, C. (1997). Glass ceilings and bottomless pits: Women’s work, women’s poverty . Boston: South End Press.

Bachman, J. E., Staff, J., O’Malley, P. M., Schulenberg, J. E., & Freedman-Doan, P. (2011). Twelfth-grade student work intensity linked to later educational attainment and substance use: New longitudinal evidence. Developmental Psychology, 47 (2), 344–363.

Article   Google Scholar  

Conyers, L. (2016). Life in the nanny state: How welfare impacts those who receive it. In T. G. Palmer (Ed.), Self-control or state control: You decide (pp. 36–51). Ottawa, IL: Jameson Books.

Dalrymple, T. (2001). Life at the bottom: The worldview that makes the underclass . Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.

Daniel, J. (1970). The poor: Aliens in an affluent society: Cross-cultural communication. Communication Quarterly, 18 , 15–21.

Farrigan, T. (2017, March 1). Poverty demographics. United States Department of Agriculture: Economic Research Service . Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/rural-poverty-well-being/poverty-demographics/

Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of acting white”. The Urban Review, 18 (3), 176–206.

Goldsmith, W. W., & Blakely, E. J. (1992). Separate societies: Poverty and inequality in U.S. cities . Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Gottfredson, L. S. (2004). Intelligence: Is it the epidemiologists’ elusive “fundamental cause” of social class inequalities in health? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (1), 174–199.

Greenstone, J. D. (1991). Culture, rationality, and the underclass. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 399–408). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Harvey, P., & Conyers, L. (2016). The human cost of welfare: How the system hurts the people it’s supposed to help . Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

Haskins, R. (2006). Work over welfare: The inside story of the 1996 welfare reform law . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Haskins, R. (2013, March 13). Three simple rules poor teens should follow to join the middle class. Brookings Institute . Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/three-simple-rules-poor-teens-should-follow-to-join-the-middle-class/

Haskins, R., & Sawhill, I. (2003, September). Welfare reform & beyond #28 (The brookings institution policy brief). Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/pb28.pdf

Horn, W. F., & Sawhill, I. V. (2001). Fathers, marriage, and welfare reform. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 421–441). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Hymowitz, K. S. (2006). Marriage and caste in America: Separate and unequal families in a post-marital age . Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.

Kornbluh, F. (2007). The battle for welfare rights: Politics and poverty in modern America . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Kristof, N. (2012, December 7). Profiting from a child’s illiteracy. The New York Times . Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/opinion/sunday/kristof-profiting-from-a-childs-illiteracy.html

Kroft, S. (2013, October 10). Disability, USA: Steve Kroft reports on the alarming state of the federal disability program, which has exploded in size and could run out of money. CBS News: 60 Minutes . Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/disability-usa/

Larson, C. R. (2016, September 16). Review: J. D. Vance’s “Hillbiilly Elegy”. Counter Punch . Retrieved from http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/16/review-j-d-vances-hillbilly-elegy/

Lawinski, T. (2010). Living on the edge in suburbia: From welfare to workfare . Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Lewis, O. (1965). La Vida: A Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty – San Juan and New York . New York: Random House.

Macartney, S., Bishaw, A., & Fontenot, K. (2013, February). Poverty rates for selected detailed race and Hispanic groups by state and place: 2007–2011. U.S. Census Bureau . Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr11-17.pdf

Minow, M. (2000). Choice or commonality: Welfare and schooling after the welfare state. In M. J. Bane, B. Coffin, & R. Thiemann (Eds.), Who will provide?: The changing role of religion in American social welfare (pp. 147–177). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Murray, C. (1992). Preface. In M. Olasky (Ed.), The tragedy of American compassion (pp. xi–xvii). Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

Murray, C. (2012). Coming apart: The state of white America, 1960–2010 . New York: Crown Forum.

Newman, K. S. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city . New York: Knopf and the Russell Sage Foundation.

O’Shaughnessy, L. (2013, February 5). More students working (a lot) in college. CBS News . Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-students-working-a-lot-in-college

Olasky, M. (2008). The tragedy of American compassion . Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

Perna, L. W. (2010, July–August). Understanding the working college student: New research shows that students are working more and juggling a multitude of roles, creating anxiety and lowering graduation rates. American Association of University Professors . Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/article/understanding-working-college-student#.WRSpmFXyucM

Philipsen, G. (1976). Places for speaking in Teamsterville. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62 , 15–25.

Phillips, J. D. (2016). Homeless: Narratives from the streets . Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

Poverty rates by race/ethnicity. (2015). The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . Retrieved from http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/poverty-rate-by-raceethnicity/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

Reddinger, W. (2016, December 20). Is culture the key to poverty? Lean Liberty . Retrieved from http://www.learnliberty.org/blog/is-culture-the-key-to-poverty/

Riemer, F. J. (2001). Working at the margins: Moving off welfare in America . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Riis, J. A. (1890). How the other half lives: Studies among the tenements of New York . New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Book   Google Scholar  

Robinson-Wood, T. (2016). The convergence of race, ethnicity, and gender: Multiple identities in counseling (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Senators introduce bipartisan legislation to reduce overlapping benefit payments. (2013, June 6). Tom Coburn: Press Room . Retrieved from http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ContentRecord_id=5f02f5ef-31f3-435e-a5ac-3a217dbedd87 &ContentType_id=d741b7a7–7863–4223-9904-8cb9378aa03a&Group_id=7a55cb96–4639-4dac-8c0c-99a4a227bd3a

Smith, L. (2010). Psychology, poverty, and the end of social exclusion: Putting our practice to work . New York: Teachers College Press.

Sowell, T. (1972). Black education: Myths and tragedies . New York: McKay.

Sowell, T. (2015). Wealth, poverty and politics: An international perspective . New York: Basic Books.

Sowell, T. (2016, September 14). Election year books. Townhall . Retrieved from https://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2016/09/14/election-year-books-n2216610

Stoesz, D. (2000). A poverty of imagination: Bootstrap capitalism, sequel to welfare reform . Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Vance, J. D. (2016). Hillbilly elegy: A memoir of a family and culture in crisis . New York: Harper.

Whiting, G. C. (1971). Code restrictedness and opportunities for change in developing countries. Journal of Communication, 21 , 36–57.

Williams, W. E. (2011). Race & economics: How much can be blamed on discrimination . Stanford: Hoover Institute Press Publication.

Williams, W. E. (2012, February 15). Why are inner-city schools more violent today than in the past? Desert News . Retrieved from http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765550887/Why-are-inner-city-schools-more-violent-today-than-in-the-past.html

Williamson, K. D. (2016, March 15). The author is a fiction. National Review . Retrieved from http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/432828/what-critics-get-wrong-about-white-poverty

Working more than 20 hours a week is a bad idea for teens. (2011, April). National Consumer League . Retrieved from http://www.nclnet.org/working_more_than_20_hours_a_week_is_a_bad_idea_for_teens

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Brandywine, Media, PA, USA

Joshua D. Phillips

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua D. Phillips .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Craig L. Frisby

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada - Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA

William T. O'Donohue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Phillips, J.D. (2018). The Culture of Poverty: On Individual Choices and Infantilizing Bureaucracies. In: Frisby, C., O'Donohue, W. (eds) Cultural Competence in Applied Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78997-2_16

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78997-2_16

Published : 26 July 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-78995-8

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-78997-2

eBook Packages : Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• News & Events
• Research Publications
• Faculty Experts
• Get Involved
• Working Papers
• Policy Briefs

Policy Brief #21

Reconsidering Culture and Poverty June 2010 Highlights from The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Volume 629, May 2010. David J. Harding, Michèle Lamont, and Mario Luis Small, eds. The volume can be accessed in its entirety from the Russell Sage Foundation by clicking here . Download printable version Why Re-examine the Role of Culture in Poverty?

• To debunk existing myths about the cultural orientations of the poor. Developing a complete understanding of the conditions that produce and sustain poverty requires analyzing empirically how the poor make sense of and explain their current situations, options, and decisions, and what they do to improve their own prospects and those of their children. The authors emphasize that the poor share many of the same cultural views as the middle class and that there is considerable diversity in the cultural orientations of those living in poverty.
• To understand better why people respond to poverty the way they do, both in how they cope with it and how they escape it. A cultural lens helps us to understand why poor people living in the same high poverty neighborhoods make substantially different decisions regarding pregnancy, studying, community participation, job search and even crime. Exploring further how low-income populations make sense of their experiences and options is essential for developing stronger explanations of how some are able to escape poverty while others are not.
• To improve the efficacy of social policy. Ignoring culture can lead to misguided policies if the true motivations of poor people are misunderstood or ignored. In addition, the authors conclude that we need to better understand the cultural assumptions that guide policy decisions concerning the poor.

New Thinking about Culture and Poverty Culture is back on the poverty agenda. The last generation of scholarship on the povertyculture relationship was primarily identified, for better or worse, with the “culture of poverty” model of Oscar Lewis (1) and the report on the Negro Family by Daniel Patrick Moynihan (2). Lewis argued that sustained poverty generated a set of cultural attitudes, beliefs, values, and practices, and that this culture of poverty would tend to perpetuate itself over time, even if the economic conditions that originally gave rise to it were to change. Scholars in the 1970s were accused of “blaming the victims” for their problems because they seemed to imply that people might cease to be poor if they simply changed their culture. The heated political environment dissuaded many young scholars of the time from studying the connections between culture and poverty. Scholars began to reconsider culture and poverty after the publication of Wilson’s The Truly Disadvantaged (1987). In recent years, a new generation of scholars of culture and povertyhas conceived of culture in substantially different ways. It typically rejects the idea that whether people are poor can be explained by their values and questions the utility of the old distinction between “culture” and “structure.” It generally does not define culture as comprehensively as Lewis did, instead distinguishing values from perceptions, and attitudes from behavior. It sets aside the ideas that most members of a group or nation share “a culture” or that a group’s culture is more or less coherent or internally consistent. Its conceptions of culture tend to be more narrowly defined, easier to measure, and more plausibly falsifiable. The objective of a recently published volume of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science is to demonstrate that the theoretically informed and empirically grounded study of culture can and should be part of the poverty research agenda. In their introduction, Small, Harding and Lamont describe seven cultural concepts now widely used by scholars—values, frames, repertoires, narratives, symbolic boundaries, cultural capital, and institutions. These concepts are employed in the volume’s essays to illustrate the value of understanding the cultural perspectives of both individuals living in poverty and the policy elites who make poverty policy. Culture and the Experience of Poverty Persistent black joblessness has long been a core cause of poverty. In her examination of how Hispanic and black blue-collar workers decide whether or not to help co-ethnics in their search for jobs, Sandra Susan Smith finds that both groups apply plausible criteria in judging whether to help friends, family, and neighbors find jobs and in judging whether their support may tarnish their own reputations in the workplace. Smith concludes that, because of differences in perceptions regarding joblessness between black and Hispanic communities, there may be a greater reluctance on the part of black workers to provide support. Because of the importance of social networks in finding a job, this reluctance should be viewed, along with other factors, as part of the reason why persistent black joblessness has been so difficult to mitigate. Young African-American men are at high risk of unemployment and poverty. How young unemployed African-American understand what makes for a good job is the focus of Alford A. Young’s contribution. Young concludes that young men exhibited diverse perspectives in framing the attributes of an ideal job. Some focused on wages and benefits, while others focused on features of the work itself, such as autonomy and creativity. Both the extent of their prior work experience and their postsecondary educational experience contributed to these variations in how they characterized a good job. He concludes that greater attention to such variation, rather than attempts to broadly characterize a group’s culture, can help us better understand the work orientation of low-income people. Education is a proven pathway out of poverty, but why do some children achieve this goal while others do not? Stephen Vaisey investigates the role of “ideals” and “expectations” in educational success. Lowincome young people, he finds, have lower ideals for higher education attainment than non-poor respondents and also have lower expectations for what they will actually attain. Stressing the importance of this connection, he concludes that scholars need to integrate values into their research and to work to understand the social and cultural sources of differences in values and motivations. Child support and responsible parenthood have long been important policy topics. Yet as Maureen Waller points out, policy thinking has been largely dominated by economic considerations such as support payments and has not incorporated perceptions of the parents themselves about indicators of good parental involvement. Drawing on interviews with poor mothers and fathers, she identifies non-economic factors that parents find important in the father’s role: caregiving, spending time, role modeling, and material support. Financial support, though important, did not overshadow noneconomic factors, and parents often view informal financial support as signaling a greater commitment from fathers than coerced formal child support payments. The latter were often viewed as potentially damaging to the relationship between the father and child. Incorporation of these cultural perspectives, Waller concludes, will strengthen public child support and parenthood policies. Poverty is more common among singlemother households. The prevailing view that unwed pregnancy in the inner city stems from men’s unwillingness to commit to long-term monogamous relationships is challenged by Nathan Fosse in his study of low-income African-American men. He argues that three “cultural logics” underlie attitudes toward faithfulness and non-monogamy: doubt (the belief that one’s partner may also be cheating); duty (obligations to male peers, family, or partners); and destiny (“life is short” justifications for cheating vs. future orientation monogamy). He stresses, though, that none of these logics produces clear-cut courses of action. His analysis shows that inner-city culture is far-more heterogeneous than traditionally thought. Culture and Policymaking Can political institutions increase the voice of the poor in policymaking? Vijayendra Rao and Paromita Sanyal examine a public policy implemented throughout India. “Gram sabhas,” local public forums in some two million towns and villages, represent a “public sphere” where Indians of all income levels meet to discuss issues of local importance. They found that while the forums did indeed provide opportunity for participation, the proceedings tended to be dominated by competitive rather than deliberative interactions, and that class distinctions were regularly invoked. Yet they also found that the gram sabhas helped to create a new “political culture” that offers poor people avenues for engaging others and questioning decisions and that help to create a voice for the needs of India’s poorest citizens. How do the cultural lenses through which policy elites view poverty affect policymaking? Joshua Guetzkow compares two different conceptions of antipoverty policy from two periods in the United States. In the Great Society period (1964-1968), policy elites largely diagnosed the root causes of poverty as “community breakdown:” poor health, lack of education and job skills, discrimination, urban slums, and inadequate health care. In this conception, poor people themselves were largely held to be blameless victims “trapped” in poor neighborhoods. Public policy stressing income supports, job training and incentives for working were implemented. By the early 1980s, however, the diagnosis of policy elites had shifted and family breakdown (teen pregnancy, drug abuse, lack of mainstream values) as well as dependence on public support systems constituted the diagnostic frame. This led to more restrictive welfare policies culminating in the 1996 welfare reform legislation, which emphasized work requirements and self-sufficiency. Guetzkow concludes that the policy frames of these different sets of policy elites contributed to the shift in policy toward a more punitive and less generous stance toward the poor. Culture, Poverty and Effective Social Policy The importance of both culture and structural factors in understanding poverty is the central thesis of William Julius Wilson’s chapter. While both culture and structure matter, it is the structural impediments that have the largest negative effects on black inner-city neighborhoods. A significant policy challenge, he argues, is that despite the significant effects of structural factors in prolonging inner-city poverty, most Americans believe that the causes are rooted in the personal behaviors of the poor. Wilson argues that a holistic approach, one that appreciates both the structural challenges and the cultural dynamics, has greatest potential to address deep-rooted poverty problems. He discusses the potential of the Harlem Children’s Zone as an exemplar of this approach. What lessons should policymakers take from this volume? Representative Lynn Woolsey stresses the need for legislators to constantly reexamine the assumptions they use in framing problems, and to be aware of societal changes that make their assumptions obsolete. She cites the shifting nature of the American family toward two-worker families, and the ways these changes have affected economic and social dynamics for families. She argues that policies that support modern families are essential. Representative Raúl Grijalva argues that poverty is far more complicated and “insidious” than policy makers often believe. Expanding perspectives on the causes and consequences of poverty is essential if appropriate solutions are to be envisioned and carried out. References 1. Lewis, Oscar. 1966. La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty—San Juan and New York. New York: Random House. 2. Moynihan, Daniel P. 1965. The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor. The National Poverty Center is charged with promoting high-quality research on the causes and consequences of poverty, evaluating and analyzing policies to alleviate poverty, and training the next generation of poverty researchers. The National Poverty Center’s Policy Brief series summarizes key academic research findings, highlighting implications for policy. The NPC encourages the dissemination of this publication and grants full reproduction right to any party so long as proper credit is granted the NPC. Sample citation: “Title, National Poverty Center Policy Brief #x”. Major funding for the National Poverty Center is provided by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the National Poverty Center or any sponsoring agency.

Joan and Sanford Weill hall Suite 5100 735 South State Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109-3091

[email protected] | Marketing Toolkit

© The Regents of the University of Michigan

Hosted by Michigan Creative