Forgot password?
New to Digital Leadership? Create your account
Your e-mail address: * Your first name: *
Help us better understand the UNITE community
Our 35-page comprehensive innovation guide covers the key areas why innovation fails. While it cannot cover all the solutions (that would take books to fill), it provides you with a convenient starting point for your analysis and provides further resources and links to the corresponding UNITE models, ultimately allowing you to work towards a doubling and tripling your chances of success.
Discover the largest library of innovation & transformation tools on the internet!
Choose Your Password *
Confirm Your Password *
Already have an account? Log in
Country * Please Select Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin (Dahomey) Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Brunswick and Lüneburg Bhutan Bulgaria Burkina Faso (Upper Volta) Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Central American Federation Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Free State Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Grand Duchy of Tuscany Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Holy See Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nassau Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papal States Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Piedmont-Sardinia Poland Portugal Qatar Republic of Congo Republic of Korea (South Korea) Republic of the Congo Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Schaumburg-Lippe Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland State of Palestine Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United States United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Württemberg Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Industry * Please Select Automotive, mobilty & transport Financial Services Chemical & agriculture Construction & Real Estate Consulting Education Energy Banking, insurance & FS FMCG Food Gov / Public Industry Health & lifestyle Logistics, Aero & Shipping Media & Entertainment Natural resources & mining Pharma & Biotech Retail & trade Tech & E-Commerce Telco Tourism design Information technology & services Management consulting Retail Pharmaceuticals International trade & development Professional training & coaching luxury goods & jewelry Automotive Insurance Mechanical or industrial engineering Company Size * XS - 1-10 S - 10-100 M - 100-1000 L - 1000-5000 XL - > 5000
Most of our models and canvases are designed to be applied!
To help you personalize them to your exact business requirements, you can download fully editable versions of the UNITE models available (PowerPoint format)!
They are straightforward to work with, and you can directly incorporate them into your presentations as you need…thus saving countless hours of replication!
PS: did you know that you are also getting hi-res print-ready versions for your workshops?
Each month we host our exclusive, invitation-only webinar series where one of our industry-leading experts updates our members on the latest news, progress and concepts around business strategy, innovation and digital transformation, as well as other related topics.
You will receive the book in PDF and EPUB formats, ideal for your computer, Kindle, Tablet or other eReading device.
These sessions are your opportunity to bring any questions or challenges you’re facing and receive expert guidance on the spot.
Come and be a part of engaging discussions where your unique concerns are heard and addressed.
If you are occasionally looking for a sparring partner or you need limited support, then this option will be ideal for you. Coaching sessions are 1-2 hours where we can discuss any challenge or opportunity you are currently facing.
If you need a few more hours outside of this provision, then these could be billed transparently.
We believe support shouldn’t be limited. Because we typically find that the occasional hour just doesn’t cut it – particularly if you and your team are in the midst of a large and complex project.
Your time with Stefan is therefore unlimited (fair usage applies) – in his function as coach and sparring partner. That does mean that you will still have to do the work – we cannot take that off you, unless you hire us as consultants. But you will get valuable strategic insight and direction to make sure you are always focusing your efforts where they will lead to the best results.
We believe support shouldn’t be limited. If you generally know what you are doing but want a sparring partner to frequently raise questions to, this is the perfect choice!
In addition to your monthly 1-1 live coaching sessions with Stefan, you will also get unlimited support from him via email and WhatsApp messaging (fair usage applies). This not only allows you to get valuable strategic direction in your calls, but also gives you instant access to expert help as you work through your plans each month.
The fact that support is text-based means that we can speed up our responses to you while keeping the overall cost of support down.
As a welcome gift, you will receive the both the digital and physical version of our book “How to Create Innovation”, which covers numerous relevant resources and provides additional deep dives into our UNITE models and concepts.
The print version will be shipped out to you on sign-up. The digital version will be emailed to you, and comes in PDF and EPUB formats, ideal for your computer, Kindle, Tablet or other eReading device.
1x major or 2x smaller workshops based on the UNITE models.
All of our Professional plans offer full access to the following:
We are currently in the process of launching our brand new community., we are designing our community to specifically help you:.
Cancelling your plan will deactivate your plan after the current billing period ends. You will not be charged further, but also won’t be able to access [exclusive features/services].
Simply fill out the below form and book in a time for our initial session that works for you. This initial session is free, no strings attached, and is where we can discuss your Blueprint needs more in-depth before moving forward.
Founder of digital leadership.
Partner for it strategy & business alignment.
Speak to our team today to find the best solution for your business to grow and scale.
We are here to support you across the entire lifecycle in all topics related to #digital, #innovation, #transformation and #marketing!
Stefan F. Dieffenbacher Founder of Digital Leadership
Contact form, contact details, book a call.
Title, first name & last name * Email address * Phone number Please let us know how we can best support you! *
By clicking “Send”, I agree to Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
“Please be invited to reach out! We are happy to help and look forward to a first meeting!”
+41 (0) 44 562 42 24
Find a time on our calender that best suits you !
Founder and CEO of Digital Leadership
SCHEDULE YOUR INITIAL CALL
What is the main challenge you're currently facing in your business?
Let’s find the best solution for your business to grow and scale sustainably!
We will uncover your current business situation and goals and provide you with a bespoke solution that helps you drastically grow your business working with us.
Read the reviews and make sure that this is not a waste of time, but a super effective tool.
Schedule your free business assessment call with our founder.
On this call, we will uncover your current business situation and goals and talk about how to drive change and solve your need.
Choose the meeting type that applies to your needs and schedule a time to meet with someone from our team. We look forward to speaking with you soon!
Welcome to our scheduling page.
In a uniquely designed 60 or 90 minute session* , we will …
Based on the Blueprinting session, you will receive a tailored blueprint that aligns with your objectives, vision and goals, ensuring that your initiative is a success from start to finish.
In this session, you will be working together with Patrick Zimmermann, Associate Partner for Customer Experience
In this session, you will be working together with Dr. Andreas Rein, Partner at Digital Leadership for Culture & Org Change
In this session, you will be working together with Sascha Martini, Partner at Digital Leadership for Innovation and Digital Transformation
In this session, you will be working together with Stefan F. Dieffenbacher, Founder of Digital Leadership Stefan is a global thought leader in the innovation space
In this session, you will be working together with Adam D. Wisniewski, Partner for IT Strategy & Business Alignment
Write a personalized review! Log in
© Entrepreneurial Insights based on the concept of Alex Osterwalder
In this article, we will look at the “Key Activities” block in the Business Model Canvas . We will cover, 1) an introduction to key activities , 2) questions to consider , 3) typical activities , 4) categories for key activities , and 5) a case study on LinkedIn .
As the title suggests, these are the most important tasks a company must carry out in order to fulfill its business purpose. To be successful, a company must carry out key actions that are primarily dictated by its business model. As we studied with the key resources building block, key activities are similarly pivotal in an organization fulfilling its value proposition, reaching its customer segments, sustain its customer relationships and ultimately create long-term revenue streams. Key activities are different according to the business model of the organization carrying out the activity. Hence, an organization that relies heavily on its 3 rd party contracts will list channel management as a key activity. A product-driven business will lend more significance to activities such as continuous research to understand their users better as well as constant innovation in technology.
Hence, it is safe to assume that a key activity for software giant Microsoft is Software Development; similarly, for computer manufacturer Dell, supply chain management may be a key activity, and a consulting business like McKinsey probably lists solving client problems as its key activity.
When evaluating your business through the Key Activities building block it is essential that you take a holistic view of the business and evaluate related building blocks as well, to understand how they will contribute to your key activities.
Our Value Propositions will obviously have the most profound impact on the kind of activities we carry out. However, as the business flourishes, we may begin to include unnecessary activities within this block as well. To prevent this, we use a method called the Minimum Viable Product or MVP , which is the most basic version of your product made through a single cycle of the build, measure and learn loop. Most entrepreneurs will resist the Minimum Viable Product because everyone believes that for a product to be a success, it must provide maximum value to its customers. This brings us back to the Customer Segment and Value Proposition building blocks where we learnt that we have to be selective about the customers we target and the kind of value we provide by relieving their pains and giving them gains. Creating a bloated product with tons of extra feature that are of no value to your customer but which add to his investment, is not the way to go. A product is a combination of its form and function, function being what it does and form detailing how it does it. This form is crucial to the customer experience and helps in determining the key activities. Similarly, the kind of customer relationship you want establish will also entail certain key activities to bring it about and so on.
As mentioned earlier the Key activities building block creates a bridge between your value propositions and the customer segments’ needs. Some typical key activities that are commonly practiced by most organizations are listed below;
The research and development department is required to liaise with all other functions of the company whether it be production, marketing or sales. The typical functions of a research department are mentioned below;
Production management consists of a number of activities which are outlined below;
The Marketing department is responsible for the growth of the company by getting word of the company’s existence and the value it provides to its customers. The functions of the marketing department are explained below;
Sales and customer service play a key role in the purchase and post purchase behavior and experience of your customer. This department is key to ensuring that you build a cadre of repeat customers who will become your advocates in the market and drive more business in through word of mouth. Conversely, these customers can also be extremely vocal if they have suffered a bad customer experience with you and can just as easily drive business away. Hence, one of the most crucial weapons in your arsenal is your sales and customer services team. They fulfill the following responsibilities on behalf of your company;
These activities are generally a characteristic of manufacturing firms and entail the design, creation and delivery of significant quantities of the product.
For a company that manufactures and sells pantyhose, typical value propositions are listed below;
The Key activities would then be;
Some consumers or customers have chronic problems. Organizations that list problem-solving as a main activity are usually aiming to find unique solutions to these individual problems. Consultancies, hospitals, and most service organizations typically are trying to solve customer problems uniquely. These organizations are characterized by lots of knowledge management and a focus on continuous learning.
Jiffy Lube is a chain of over 200 businesses in North America which offers oil change and other automotive services to its clientele. Hence, it is a service firm that aims to provide a solution to a recurring problem its target customers may have. Jiffy’s value propositions are:
Based on these, the key activities performed at Jiffy can be as follows;
Such organizations will have detailed records on repair work done on the automobiles of their repeat customers and will be able to handle the car with full knowledge of its history, much like a doctor with a regular patient.
A business model where the platform is a key resource usually has platform or network-related key activities. Networks, brands, and software can all be a part of a platform or network-related business.
Agile Enterprise Architecture or AEA offers its services to companies experiencing a surge of work or a cascade of models that need to be done within a limited amount of time. The company’s value propositions are as follows;
Based on these the key activities for this organization are;
LinkedIn is one of the world’s premier business networking websites. The value propositions it provides to its customers are as follows;
As you can see LinkedIn is a platform/ network based company characterized by a high focus on providing sharing capabilities to its customers. The Key activities performed at LinkedIn would then be;
Hence, LinkedIn spends a majority of its budget and time in ensuring that its platform remains scalable and usable as the consumer base grows rapidly.
Comments are closed.
The five forces model was developed by Michael E. Porter to help companies assess the nature of …
Great things happen when you put your target market first. Everyone wants to feel valued, and that …
In Palo Alto (CA), we meet Co-Founder & CEO of ThoughtSpot, Ajeet Singh. Ajeet talks about his story …
408,000 + job opportunities
Not yet a member? Sign Up
Find your dream job. Get on promotion fasstrack and increase tour lifetime salary.
Post your jobs & get access to millions of ambitious, well-educated talents that are going the extra mile.
First name*
Company name*
Company Website*
E-mail (work)*
Password reset instructions will be sent to your E-mail.
Denis Oakley & Co
I HELP BOLD LEADERS TRANSFORM THEIR BUSINESSES AND THE INDUSTRIES THEY COMPETE IN
February 10, 2018 By Denis Oakley
Key activities are important things your business needs to do to run. It’s even more specific than that. Key activities are the key things that you need to do in order to deliver your value propositions to customers . In this lesson, we look at what key activities are within the context of the business model canvas and how to identify them and use them correctly.
Here’s a video where I run through what the key activities are and how they fit into the business model canvas
Identifying the key activities that you need for your valuation is important. It’s equally important to consider which key activities you need to do yourself. Changing these can be a great source of business model innovation , especially when faced with business model depreciation and disruptive market changes .
To find your key activity the best place to start is your value proposition
First of all look at your value proposition. What are the key things that you need to do to make it work? If you have a florist you need to
You also need to manage your promotional channels so that customers come to the shop.
If you run a plastics factory your key activities are likely to revolve about:
Here there are many many more things that you could be doing. Key activities are the critical things that you absolutely must do in order to develop and maintain your competitive advantage .
Small businesses and startups will often list tasks or processes at this stage because they are fairly simple. When you look at the business model of large enterprises that may comprise hundreds of companies and tens of thousands of employees the key activities need to be captured at a far higher level of abstraction.
It is just the same as looking at a map at different scales. One of the keys is using the right scale to look at your business in its stage of development
What key activities do you have to do every day? This is a really good approach for helping you to figure out what is a key activity and what is not. If you or your staff are doing the same activities every day then there is a good chance that they are critical for the delivery of the value proposition. For a supermarket (looking at the unit rather than the enterprise) restocking is a key activity. When customers go into the supermarket they expect to find goods on the shelves to buy. Without them, the business model falls apart.
For a company like Google the key activities are improving its code base and then examine all the data that it has gathered to help it improve search results and let advertisers sell better-converting adverts.
For a company like IKEA, the key activities are optimising its logistics chain to ensure that every store has all the furniture that people in that market are buying. It also works on reducing the cost of its products so that it can maintain it’s market-leading position in flat packed self-assembled furniture.
Where a company is involved in making something the key activities usually centre on getting the raw materials, transforming them and then shipping or distributing the finished products.
A dairy farmer’s key activities are feeding the cows, checking them for health, milking them and then storing the milk ready for collection. Nestle’s key activities (if we look at the Yoghurt product line) are collecting the milk, processing it into yoghurt, packaging it into containers and then sending it out into its distribution network.
Space X’s key activities are all about designing and manufacturing ever larger rockets, building more effective rocket control and telemetry systems and selling orbital delivery services to its customers.
The key activities tend to vary quite widely based on the type of customer and the manufacturing process used. Where manufacturing is continuous or mass sales tend to be a far smaller portion of the key activities as these are delivered by channels. When products are very large or highly customised then sales tend to be far more complex and take longer.
Some examples of business models based around production include
Companies which are problem-orientated tend to have a different set of activities. These companies are often consultants, lawyers and other types of knowledge workers.
A lawyer, for example, has client consultations, pleading and case law review as his critical activities. Activities such as billing are generally not key activities because these are common for all businesses and provide little competitive advantage.
The deeper message of key activities is that these are the activities that provide a competitive advantage. Case law review is something that all lawyers do. How can this be a key activity/ Can you do it faster? Do you have a better process for doing it? Is one of your key resources a software system that allows you to assess more cases than would be possible or feasible by hand.
Problem-solving business models are knowledge-intensive. The key is understanding, in the business model, how this knowledge is obtained, processed and packaged to solve the customers’ problem.
When we look at platforms, what we are doing is analogous to providing a meeting hall for people to use. If it is a market place the meeting hall has to have tables for sellers to display their wares. It has to have all the facilities that buyers need to make purchases.
When we look at the key activities we can see that there is often a build once-optimise continually process. Facebook , for example, was built once. Mark Zuckerberg only ever built a single Facebook. Over time almost all the original code has been upgraded, expanded, replaced and optimised as the value proposition has changed over time.
It’s tempting to just say build and optimise the platform. That is doing too little work. What is far better is to delve down into the details and say – what is it about the way that we build and optimize the platform that gives us the amazing results?
The other aspect to bear in mind with platforms is that you are often serving two or more customer segments simultaneously using the platform. There will be platform-centric key activities. There will be key activities that are focused on each of the customer segments (or groups of them under certain conditions)
If you want to see some examples of platform key activities have a look at these business models
When I design business models for clients the key activities are one of the last parts of the business model canvas that I work on.
For most startups, there aren’t normally more than 2-3 key activities. That is mainly because if an activity is key it should be consuming most of a person’s time. Startups have few people and limited time and resources. They can’t as a result have too many key resources. They are unable to deliver on them if they do.
Having lots of key activities is also an indication of sloppy thinking and an inability to prioritise what is really important. Focusing on just a few activities allows you to get really good at them and find a source of competitive advantage . Being very good at some activities is also a great way of defending against threats to your business model .
One way of prioritising is to imagine that no-one has come into the office. You are the only person in there.
Those will normally be your key activities
So for example when I worked at a food delivery company as the VP of operations I cared about three things
That translated to
in our business model canvas.
Are you copying a business model?
Are you creating a new one?
I can help you get it right
Explorer | Trail Runner | Mountain Lover
'Big' companies are civilisation. I stay in the wilderness guiding entrepreneurs and startups on their journey to becoming 'Big'.
Then I head back to the frontier
Strategy | Marketing | Operations
Outcome : More Traction, Bigger Rounds, Better Products
Method : Problems, Customers, Business Models, Strategy
Updated: March 1, 2024
In the professional world, one thing is for sure: problem-solving is a vital skill if you want to survive and thrive. It’s a universal job skill that organizations seek in new potential employees and that managers look for when considering candidates for promotions.
But there’s a problem.
According to Payscale, 60% of managers feel that new grads entering the workforce lack problem-solving abilities – making it the most commonly lacking soft skill.
Problem-solving skill needs to be practiced and perfected on an ongoing basis in order to be applied effectively when the time comes. And while there are tons of traditional approaches to becoming a better problem-solver, there’s another (much more interesting) option: team building problem-solving activities.
The good news? This means learning and having fun don’t have to be mutually exclusive. And you can create a stronger team at the same time.
1. cardboard boat building challenge, 2. egg drop , 3. clue murder mystery, 4. marshmallow spaghetti tower , 5. corporate escape room, 6. wild goose chase, 7. lost at sea , 8. domino effect challenge, 9. reverse pyramid , 10. ci: the crime investigators, 11. team pursuit, 12. bridge builders, 13. domino effect challenge, 14. hollywood murder mystery, 15. code break, 16. cardboard boat building challenge, 6 virtual team building problem solving activities for your work group , 1. virtual escape room: mummy’s curse, 2. virtual clue murder mystery, 3. virtual escape room: jewel heist, 4. virtual code break , 5. virtual trivia time machine.
There are a ton of incredible team building problem solving activities available. We’ve hand-picked 16 of our favorites that we think your corporate group will love too.
Split into teams and create a cardboard boat made out of just the materials provided: cardboard and tape. Team members will have to work together to engineer a functional boat that will float and sail across water without sinking. Once teams have finished making their boats, they will create a presentation to explain why their boat is the best, before putting their boats to the test. The final challenge will have teams racing their boats to test their durability! Nothing says problem-solving like having to make sure you don’t sink into the water!
Every day at work, you’re forced to make countless decisions – whether they’re massively important or so small you barely think about them.
But your ability to effectively make decisions is critical in solving problems quickly and effectively.
With a classic team building problem solving activity like the Egg Drop, that’s exactly what your team will learn to do.
For this activity, you’ll need some eggs, construction materials, and a place you wouldn’t mind smashing getting dirty with eggshells and yolks.
The goal of this activity is to create a contraption that will encase an egg and protect it from a fall – whether it’s from standing height or the top of a building. But the challenge is that you and your team will only have a short amount of time to build it before it’s time to test it out, so you’ll have to think quickly!
To make it even more challenging, you’ll have to build the casing using only simple materials like:
Feel free to have some fun in picking the materials. Use whatever you think would be helpful without making things too easy!
Give your group 15 minutes to construct their egg casing before each team drops their eggs. If multiple eggs survive, increase the height gradually to see whose created the sturdiest contraption.
If you’re not comfortable with the idea of using eggs for this activity, consider using another breakable alternative, such as lightbulbs for a vegan Egg Drop experience.
With Clue Murder Mystery, your team will need to solve the murder of a man named Neil Davidson by figuring out who had the means, motive, and opportunity to commit the crime.
But it won’t be easy! You’ll need to exercise your best problem-solving skills and channel your inner detectives if you want to keep this case from going cold and to get justice for the victim.
Collaboration is critical to problem solving.
Why? Because, as the old saying goes, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. This expression reflects the fact that people are capable of achieving greater things when they work together to do so.
If you’re looking for a team building problem solving activity that helps boost collaboration, you’ll love Marshmallow Spaghetti Tower.
This game involves working in teams to build the tallest possible freestanding tower using only marshmallows, uncooked spaghetti, tape, and string.
The kicker? This all has to be done within an allotted timeframe. We recommend about thirty minutes.
For an added dimension of challenge, try adding a marshmallow to the top of the tower to make it a little more top heavy.
Whichever team has the highest tower when time runs out is the winner!
If you’ve never participated in an escape room, your team is missing out! It’s one of the most effective team building problem solving activities out there because it puts you and your colleagues in a scenario where the only way out is collaboratively solving puzzles and deciphering clues.
The principle is simple: lock your group in a room, hide the key somewhere in that room, and have them work through challenges within a set time frame. Each challenge will lead them one step closer to finding the key and, ultimately, their escape.
At Outback, we offer “done-for-you” escape rooms where we’ll transform your office or meeting room so you don’t have to worry about:
That way, you and your team can simply step inside and get to work collaborating, using creative problem solving, and thinking outside the box.
In this smartphone-based scavenger hunt team building activity , your group will split into teams and complete fun challenges by taking photos and videos around the city. Some examples of challenges you can do in this activity are:
It takes a ton of critical thinking and problem-solving to be crowned the Wild Goose Chase Champions!
Can you imagine a higher-pressure situation than being stranded at sea in a lifeboat with your colleagues?
With this team building problem solving activity, that’s exactly the situation you and your group will put yourselves. But by the time the activity is over, you’ll have gained more experience with the idea of having to solve problems under pressure – a common but difficult thing to do.
Here’s how it works.
Each team member will get a six-columned chart where:
Within this activity, each team will be equipped with the following “survival items,” listed below in order of importance, as well as a pack of matches:
To get the activity underway, divide your group into teams of five and ask each team member to take ten minutes on their own to rank the items in order of importance in the respective column. Then, give the full team ten minutes as a group to discuss their individual rankings together and take group rankings, listed in that respective column. Ask each group to compare their individual rankings with those of the group as a whole.
Finally, read out the correct order according to the US Coast Guard, listed above.
The goal of this activity is for everyone to be heard and to come to a decision together about what they need most to survive.
If your team works remotely, you can also do this activity online. Using a video conferencing tool like Zoom , you can bring your group together and separate teams into “break-out rooms” where they’ll take their time individually and then regroup together. At the end, you can bring them back to the full video conference to go through the answers together.
Many problems are intricately complex and involve a ton of moving parts. And in order to solve this type of problem, you need to be able to examine it systematically, one piece at a time.
Especially in the business world, many problems or challenges involve multiple different teams or departments working through their respective portions of a problem before coming together in the end to create a holistic solution.
As you can imagine, this is often easier said than done. And that’s why it’s so important to practice this ability.
With a collaborative team building problem solving activity like Domino Effect Challenge, that’s exactly what you’ll need to do as you and your group work to create a massive, fully functional chain reaction machine.
Here’s how it goes.
Your group will break up into teams, with each team working to complete their own section of a massive “Rube Goldberg” machine. Then, all teams will regroup and assemble the entire machine together. You’ll need to exercise communication, collaboration, and on-the-fly problem solving in order to make your chain reaction machine go off without a hitch from start to finish.
Being a great problem-solver means being adaptable and creative. And if you’re looking for a quick and easy team building problem solving activity, you’ll love the reverse pyramid.
The idea here is simple: break your group out into small teams and then stand in the form of a pyramid.
Your challenge is to flip the base and the peak of the pyramid – but you can only move three people in order to do so.
Alternatively, rather than doing this activity with people as the pyramid, you can do another version – the Pyramid Build – using plastic cups instead.
This version is a little bit different. Rather than flipping the base of a pyramid to the top, you’ll need to build the pyramid instead–but in reverse, starting from the top cup and working down.
With this version, you’ll need 36 cups and one table per group. We recommend groups of five to seven people. Give your group 20 to 30 minutes to complete the activity.
To get started, place one cup face down. Then, lift that cup and place the subsequent two cups underneath it.
The real challenge here? You can only lift your pyramid by the bottom row in order to put a new row underneath – and only one person at a time can do the lifting. The remaining group members will need to act quickly and work together in order to add the next row so that it will balance the rest of the pyramid.
If any part of your pyramid falls, you’ll need to start over. Whichever team has the most complete pyramid when time runs out will be the winner!
The value of being able to approach problems analytically can’t be overstated. Because when problems arise, the best way to solve them is by examining the facts and making a decision based on what you know.
With CI: The Crime Investigators, this is exactly what your team will be called upon to do as you put your detective’s hats on and work to solve a deadly crime.
You’ll be presented with evidence and need to uncover and decipher clues. And using only the information at your disposal, you’ll need to examine the facts in order to crack the case.
Like many of our team building problem solving activities, CI: The Crime Investigators is available in a hosted format, which can take place at your office or an outside venue, as well as a virtually-hosted format that uses video conferencing tools, or a self-hosted version that you can run entirely on your own.
Each member of your team has their own unique strengths and skills. And by learning to combine those skills, you can overcome any challenge and solve any problem. With Team Pursuit, you and your team together to tackle challenges as you learn new things about one another, discover your hidden talents, and learn to rely on each other.
This team building problem solving activity is perfect for high-energy groups that love to put their heads together and work strategically to solve problems as a group.
Collaborate with your colleague to design and build different segments of a bridge. At the end, see if the sections come together to create a free-standing structure!
Together as a group, see if you and your colleagues can build a gigantic “chain-reaction” machine that really works!
In smaller groups, participants work together to solve the challenge of creating sections of the machine using miscellaneous parts, and at the end, you’ll have to collaborate to connect it all together and put it in motion.
The case is fresh, but here’s what we know so far: we’ve got an up-and-coming actress who’s been found dead in her hotel room following last night’s awards show.
We have several suspects, but we haven’t been able to put the crime on any of them for sure yet. Now, it’s up to you and your team of detectives to crack the case. Together, you’ll review case files and evidence including police reports, coroners’ reports, photo evidence, tabloids, interrogations, and phone calls as you determine the motive, method, and murderer and bring justice for the victim.
You’ll need to put your problem-solving skills to the test as you share theories, collaborate, and think outside the box with your fellow investigators.
Using Outback’s app, split up into small groups and put your heads together to solve a variety of puzzles, riddles, and trivia. The team who has completed the most challenges when time is up, wins!
Can you stay afloat in a body of water in a boat made entirely of cardboard? Now that is a problem that urgently needs solving.
With this team building problem solving activity, you and your colleagues will split into groups and create a cardboard boat made out of just the materials provided – cardboard and tape.
Team members will have to work together to engineer a functional boat that will float and sail across water without sinking. Once teams have finished making their boats, they will create a presentation to explain why their boat is the best, before putting their boats to the test. The final challenge will have teams racing their boats across the water!
If you and your team are working remotely, don’t worry. You still have a ton of great virtual team building problem solving options at your disposal.
In this virtual escape room experience, your team will be transported into a pyramid cursed by a restless mummy. You’ll have to work together to uncover clues and solve complex challenges to lift the ancient curse.
You’ve probably never heard of a man named Neil Davidson. But your group will need to come together to solve the mystery of his murder by analyzing clues, resolving challenges, and figuring out who had the means, motive, and opportunity to commit a deadly crime.
This activity will challenge you and your group to approach problems analytically, read between the lines, and use critical thinking in order to identify a suspect and deliver justice.
If you and your team like brainteasers, then Virtual Escape Room: Jewel Heist will be a big hit.
Here’s the backstory.
There’s been a robbery. Someone has masterminded a heist to steal a priceless collection of precious jewels, and it’s up to you and your team to recover them before time runs out.
Together, you’ll need to uncover hidden clues and solve a series of brain-boggling challenges that require collaboration, creative problem-solving, and outside-the-box thinking. But be quick! The clock is ticking before the stolen score is gone forever.
With Virtual Code Break, you and your team can learn to be adaptive and dynamic in your thinking in order to tackle any new challenges that come your way. In this activity, your group will connect on a video conferencing platform where your event host will split you out into teams. Together, you’ll have to adapt your problem-solving skills as you race against the clock to tackle a variety of mixed brainteaser challenges ranging from Sudoku to puzzles, a game of Cranium, riddles, and even trivia.
Curious to see how a virtual team building activity works? Check out this video on a Virtual Clue Murder Mystery in action.
Step into the Outback Time Machine and take a trip through time, from pre-pandemic 21st century through the decades all the way to the 60’s.
This exciting, fast-paced virtual trivia game, packed with nostalgia and good vibes, is guaranteed to produce big laughs, friendly competition, and maybe even some chair-dancing.
Your virtual game show host will warm up guests with a couple of “table hopper rounds” (breakout room mixers) and split you out into teams. Within minutes, your home office will be transformed into a game show stage with your very own game show buzzers!
And if your team loves trivia, check out our list of the most incredible virtual trivia games for work teams for even more ideas.
If your remote team is eager to socialize, have some fun as a group, and channel their competitive spirit, we’ve got just the thing for you! With Virtual Jeoparty Social, you and your colleagues will step into your very own virtual Jeopardy-style game show—equipped with a buzzer button, a professional actor as your host, and an immersive game show platform! Best of all, this game has been infused with an ultra-social twist: players will take part in a unique social mixer challenge between each round.
With the right team building problem solving activities, you can help your team sharpen their core skills to ensure they’re prepared when they inevitably face a challenge at work. And best of all, you can have fun in the process.
Do you have any favorite team building activities for building problem-solving skills? If so, tell us about them in the comments section below!
For more information about how your group can take part in a virtual team building, training, or coaching solution, reach out to our Employee Engagement Consultants.
And stay updated, related articles.
I love how this blog provides a variety of problem-solving activities for team building. It’s a great resource for anyone looking to foster teamwork and collaboration!
Sandeep Kashyap
“Problems are not stop signs, they are guidelines.” – Robert Schuller
Problem-solving activities are a great way to know how team members identify problems, the way they react to them, how quickly they can find potential solutions, and then implement the best one.
When working with a team, there are not one but several types of problems that might occur and as a leader, your mindset should be to guide your team to solve those problems.
You have to take the initiative to make your team better at generating creative solutions when things go wrong.
In this article, you will find 7 easy problem-solving activities designed to encourage teamwork and unlock your team’s creativity.
There are some amazing creative activities out there that can work well for team building. These will help you put your team’s problem-solving abilities to the test while they learn how to bring their best qualities forward for effective collaboration.
These creative problem-solving games will break the monotony at the workplace and help you build a more inclusive and welcoming environment for the whole team for effective team building. Here are some of the easiest activities that will help bring substantial change to your team culture and the workplace as a whole.
Helps with: Collaboration & communication skills
Estimated time: 15-20 minutes
Things you’ll need: Nothing
How to do it:
Make your team stand in a small circle. If your team is large, then you can divide it into smaller groups and make them stand in multiple circles. Each person should hold the hands of two other people standing in the circle, but not of those who are standing directly beside them.
This should result in creating a “human knot.” The fun part (also the challenging) begins now. Ask each member of the group to untangle themselves without letting go of each other’s hands. You can set a time limit if you want. You can watch your team members as they work out moves to untangle their bodies.
This activity gives them a chance to communicate and collaborate to solve the problem quickly. They may or may not fully entangle themselves but would have started to work together to solve the problem.
Why communication is essential to problem-solving
When working as a team, no problem is big enough. A bunch of committed individuals can collaborate to overcome even the most difficult of hurdles. When all team members come together and put in a joint effort as per strategy, the problem will likely be resolved sooner.
Having problems communicating your ideas to the team? Use ProofHub discussions to keep track of ideas and important pitches.
Helps with : Adaptability & Quick Thinking
Estimated time: 10-15 Minutes
Things you’ll need: A rope and a ball of yarn
Take a rope and place it on the floor in a particular shape such that all your team members can stand inside it. If your team is large, you can use multiple ropes and divide your team into smaller groups.
The challenging part starts when all team members are made to stand inside the rope, and you start to shrink the rope slowly. As space reduces, team members will have to make subtle adjustments to maintain their position as well as balance inside the shrinking circle.
No one should step outside the circle. The challenge before your team is to quickly think together about how to keep everyone inside the circle.
Why adaptability is essential to problem-solving
This amazingly effective problem-solving activity is for teams who are facing adaptability issues. Adaptability and cognitive diversity go hand in hand, which enables your team to work out things faster. People and organizations that can adapt quickly usually come out on top because they can condition themselves to change circumstances and environments and take on board new ideas and concepts.
Helps with: Collaboration
Estimated time: 20-30 Minutes
Things you’ll need (per team):
Ask your team to utilize all the available materials to construct the tallest tower within a specific period. The tower must stand on its own and be able to support a marshmallow.
The point behind this problem-solving activity is to train the team to think on their feet while encouraging prototyping and iteration. This activity also helps to promote and build strong camaraderie and leadership.
Why collaboration is essential to problem-solving –
Peter Singe, in the Fifth Discipline , writes, “ Collectively, we can be more insightful, more intelligent than we can be individual .” This means we can solve problems better when working as a team than we can alone.
This problem-solving activity emphasizes team collaboration, which is crucial for the success of any group, irrespective of its size. It also shows that success is dependent upon close collaboration between team members.
Helps with: Decision Making, Trust, Leadership
Things you’ll need:
Divide your team into groups of 4-5 people each (applicable for large teams). Each team should have its leader to guide them. Remember, team leaders, are not allowed to use their hands in any way to help their respective groups. Now, the fun part of this problem-solving activity is that team members are blindfolded, so they can’t use their hands!
Every team is given 30 minutes to build a tent. The time is set to create a sense of urgency within the team. For example, give your team a scenario where they have to make a tent to save themselves from approaching thunderstorms. The tent should be able to withstand high winds from the storm.
After the game is over, you can turn on the fan to see which tent can stand on its own even after withstanding winds blowing at high speed.
This problem-solving activity aims to improve the listening skills of team members to execute the task as per the leader’s instructions.
Why decision-making is essential to problem-solving
When managing teams and projects , team managers are burdened with the responsibility of making decisions that concern all. Decision-making is essential to problem-solving because if the right decision is taken at the right time, it could resolve the problem, eventually benefiting the entire team and the organization.
Helps with: Decision Making & Collaboration
Give a single egg to each team and let it choose randomly from different construction materials. The task that is to be assigned to each team is that it has to create a carrier for an egg that prevents it from breaking.
Once teams are done with creating carriers, place an egg in them and drop them (from over a ledge or a balcony), one by one. The purpose is to find which team’s carrier (s) can save an egg from breaking.
If multiple eggs remain unbroken, you can keep increasing the height of the fall to find out the last egg that survives even after falling from a higher height. The winning team is the one that created the most durable carrier that survived until the last.
The idea behind this problem-solving activity is to encourage all members of the team to work together towards achieving the common goal.
Why teamwork is essential to problem-solving
Joint efforts by a group of individuals to achieve the set target by utilizing limited resources can save the organization valuable time, money, and resources.
How it helps: Critical Thinking & Creative Problem Solving
Estimated time: 15-20 minutes
Things you’ll need: A piece of paper, pen, and pencil
As the name of this problem-solving activity suggests, the idea is to present a problem to your team and ask them to quickly come up with the dumbest ideas for the problem at hand. This could be a real-world problem that your team is facing, or it could be an imagined scenario.
Once all team members have written down the dumbest ideas, they could think of, evaluate every idea to determine which ones are most likely to work and which ones are least likely to be seen as a viable solution that can work.
How critical thinking is essential to problem-solving
Some problems need to be solved by out-of-the-box thinking. Creative problem-solving ideas might sound unorthodox to work, but these give you additional options to consider. You can discover some solutions that might not be obvious to start with but can be incredibly effective in delivering expected results.
Brainstorm these dumb (or not so dumb) ideas in ProofHub through online chat. And start your uninterrupted collaborative journey for FREE today.
How it helps: Communication, Problem-solving, & Management
Hike the key and a list of clues around the room. Ask team members to solve all the clues to find the key and unlock the room to escape within the allotted time. Hide the clues and, most importantly, the key around the room.
Ask all team members to enter the room and lock the door. Give them 30 minutes or 1 hour to find the key using the clues hidden in the room. This problem-solving activity can get your team going up and running as they race against the time to find a solution to the problem at hand.
How putting intensive efforts is essential to problem-solving
Complex problems require an intensive team effort. Your team can achieve specific, time-bound goals by collaborating closely and thinking quickly under pressure.
Trust is the basis of strong relationships. No team can hope to achieve success if members do not want to engage with each other and make that human connection that is so vital for them for better collaboration.
Team members should first know each other well, both professionally and personally, primarily before they are assigned a large, complex project where tensions will run high at some point.
When some team members do not get easy access to crucial information related to a project, it can lead to a dreaded information gap within the team. Scattered information makes matters worse for managers and team members.
Having all the information stored and organized in a single location, in the form of files and folders, makes information accessibility easy for all team members. Team members can collaborate on them effectively , review, proof, and share feedback in one place , which saves a whole lot of time.
“According to an American Psychological Association survey that spoke to more than 1,500 workers , it was found that 50% didn’t feel that their employers shared the information they required to be successful within their jobs.”
For any project to be a success, teams, managers, and clients must be on the same page. Without transparency, trust will take a backseat within the team, and it can lead to a plethora of problems that can spell doomsday for the company.
The task of establishing transparency starts at the top. Project managers are responsible for setting a prime example for their team members in terms of the way they conduct themselves. Employees are likely to follow their leader’s behaviors, positive or negative, and it becomes your responsibility to inspire them through positive actions.
“David Grossman reported in “The Cost of Poor Communications” that a survey of 400 companies with 100,000 employees each cited an average loss per company of $62.4 million per year because of inadequate communication to and between employees.”
Poor communication happens when it doesn’t happen regularly across the team, and not all members participate in it. It can also occur when team members interrupt one another, maintain silence, and indicate problems but fail to address them formally. Some members may nod in agreement but may not agree in reality.
Using different communication modes can bridge the gap between team members. At the same time, encouraging members to share their ideas and concerns openly can also help clear any misunderstandings, doubts, and confusion.
“ One in two employees report that their jobs lack purpose, and an equal number feel disconnected from their company’s mission.”
If I think about the teams I least enjoyed working with, they were the ones that had a vague understanding of what exactly their purpose was and how they planned to achieve that goal. It’s hard to put in your best efforts when you don’t know the purpose behind the work you’re doing. The most satisfying teamwork occurs when the purpose is well-defined and team members are aligned with each other.
“ $359 billion in paid hours or the equivalent of 385 million working days are lost each year due to workplace conflict.”
Conflicts and tension can be healthy and trigger useful debates if managed carefully. However, team members can cross the line often. The negative effects of workplace conflict include but are not limited to, poor productivity, absenteeism, work disruptions, project failure , lower retention rates, and termination. Different opinions in the workplace are common, but it’s their mishandling that can spell troubles for an organization.
Team leaders can practice constructive criticism to make employees realize their shortcomings without making them feel humiliated. You can appreciate their strong points but should not hesitate to point out their weaknesses (in performance or conduct) in an affirmative tone.
This is a common problem, especially among large teams. Some team members are not clear about their roles; what are they supposed to do, and when. At the end of the day, the blame game happens. Team members blame their managers and vice versa, and it’s all due to poor task management.
By creating and assigning custom roles , managers can allow team members or clients to do things that fall under their work domain and job responsibilities.
“When managers recognize employees’ contribution, their engagement increases by 60%”.
Having demotivated employees working for you is probably the biggest misfortune of your organization. However, have you ever tried to find out the reason for some of your employees losing motivation? It can be due to not being appreciated at work , not feeling like a part of the team, personal reasons, etc.
Whatever the reason may be, a team manager should quickly confront the situation to solve it for good. Having one-on-one discussions with team members can go a long way in helping you to know about the exact reasons behind their below-par performance and come up with effective solutions.
“ But how problem-solving activities are going to help me, my team members, and the organization?” Many readers, especially team managers, must have this question in mind while reading this article.
I understand that readers want to know how problem-solving activities can benefit them. So, I have prepared a list of the pros of such activities to develop positivity in the workplace. Read on to know more about it.
Problem-solving activities help in bringing about the best in every member of the team. Every member enthusiastically puts forth his unique idea of solving the problem. This helps team managers to weigh in different solutions for resolving a problem and then choose the most suitable one. In other words, this process stimulates better thinking.
For example – A remote team with widely dispersed members was struggling with a lack of communication . Emails and texting were just not good enough. Mike was leading the team, and he asked all members to suggest ways to improve communication within the remote team.
John suggested using online chat software for instant group or individual chat, Sid suggested using video conferencing software for daily team meetings, and Shane suggested using telephonic calls, texting, and emails for official communication.
As a result of quick thinking and sharing of ideas, Mike and his team benefited greatly by using different communication modes to share information and feedback easily.
Some people can handle a higher amount of risk. It’s because they have successfully dealt with difficult situations before. Team problem-solving activities help in conditioning the minds of individuals so they can respond to stressful situations better.
Regular communication between team members can help to solve problems efficiently. Problem-solving activities within teams foster cooperation and intra-team communication, which eventually creates a better understanding between team members.
“ Try ProofHub TODAY for on-time project delivery and on-point team accountability.”
When a team works as a strong unit, the company or organization experiences improved productivity, which eventually leads to improved profit margins. The involvement of managers and team members in problem-solving activities can have a positive result for the company in terms of overall growth and profitability.
Even though the aforementioned problem-solving activities can be amazingly effective in enhancing collaboration and communication within your team, there’s no denying the fact that using a top-rated team collaboration and project management software like ProofHub can help team managers solve quite a few problems efficiently.
Whether you’re having trouble with delayed communication, poor organization of files and folders, poor time management, inadequate task management , or low control over teams and projects, ProofHub is your all-in-one solution to put an end to your managerial woes and help you and your team achieve more in less.
Pricing – Simple pricing for all team sizes. For information on our pricing plans, kindly visit our pricing page .
Many organizations face a plethora of problems that haunt their teams consistently. These problems have a rippling effect on the team’s performance, hamper its productivity, and cause delays in the organizational goals.
However, problem-solving activities can bring all members closer as a team and encourage them to contribute to resolving problems effectively while having fun. These easy problem-solving activities can improve your team’s solutions-generating capabilities, eventually benefiting everyone.
No per user fee. No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
Sam is a financial and business journalist with a focus on business and cryptocurrency market…
Connor is an experienced freelance writer and cryptocurrency specialist based in Glasgow, Scotland. He holds…
The key activities in business model canvas show the main things every company does to make money, no matter its size or type.
These key activities are the heart of how a company works and plans.
The Business Model Canvas , a tool many companies use, points out how important these tasks are and how they connect with other parts of the business.
The key activities in a business model canvas refer to the main things your business does to make money. This includes day-to-day work, marketing, production, solving issues, and office work.
Your key activities will change depending on the type of business you operate .
If you are a web developer, User Interface (UI) design and coding will be key activities. On the other hand, if you are a business coach, problem-solving and customer service are key activities.
When deciding what your key activities are, you’ll think about how you make things, solve problems, and use tools or networks.
But when I guide my clients, I suggest another way to think about these tasks.
In the business model canvas, there are different sections, or “blocks”. One of the goals is to find a unique space in the market where there’s less competition.
This is often called finding a “ blue ocean “ .
So, when thinking about your key activities, it’s about understanding what makes your business special. This helps you stand out and offer something valuable to your customers .
When figuring out the key activities for your business using the business model canvas, I suggest focusing on certain sections.
Even though all sections are important, two of them stand out:
That’s because your key activities connect what you offer to the people you serve .
For example, if we look at Amazon’s business model, a key activity that makes them different from brick-and-mortar retailers like Walmart is related to the evaluation phase of the channels block.
By collecting and displaying product review information, Amazon assists the buyer in making a decision among similar products .
Since it is not possible to read product reviews at Walmart, collecting and displaying review data is a key activity that helps differentiate Amazon from many of its competitors.
Source: Business Model Analyst, 2023
Another example is when it comes to delivery.
Two-day, next-day Prime delivery, and even drone deliveries are shortening the time between purchasing and receiving the product in your hands, making the delivery phase of its channels a key activity to differentiate Amazon from other online e-commerce sites.
When it comes to the five phases that make up the channel block of the business model canvas, here are a few sample questions you will want to address when developing the key activities in business model canvas.
Another area where key activities can help your business find its blue ocean is by changing the customer relationship your business has with its customers.
Most stores that sell computer systems, like Best Buy, rely on knowledgeable salespeople, which can vary and be expensive.
On the other hand, Dell chose a different path with the relationship it has with its customers.
Rather than rely on a salesperson’s knowledge and a customer’s access based on store hour limitations, Dell uses an online application.
By assessing how the customer will use their computer, D ell helps the consumer understand all of their configuration options to build a custom PC.
They even provide a running total and a list of special deals, so the customer can do a series of “what-ifs” to build a computer that will meet their unique needs within their budgets.
Will a key activity be to provide an automated service like Dell, a dedicated personal assistant for the life of the relationship like Wells Fargo’s Private Banking Services, or allow customers to be part of your offering with a co-creation option like YouTube?
In conclusion, while examining all of the nine core blocks of your business model canvas may help you define your key activities, there are 4 primary questions you must ask yourself :
Businesses change over time, and so do their key activities.
It’s crucial to see that what was a key activity today might not be tomorrow. The digital age has changed how customers act, the tech we use, and the market.
So, businesses must always evaluate their key activities in the business model canvas to stay on top.
For example, ten years ago, having a website was a big deal. Now, it’s normal.
The key activity today might be making that website work well on phones or adding chat tools to help customers.
A good way to see if your key activities are still the right fit is by getting feedback . This means asking customers, workers, and others what they think and using that to change your key activities in the business model canvas.
Let’s say you sell things online, and many customers say delivery is slow.
Then, making delivery faster is a key activity . But if customers love a part of your product, you might want to do more of that.
Technology is big in shaping key activities. With more data, businesses can know what customers want. This information can reveal new key activities.
Also, with more people on social media, looking after your brand online is another key activity.
This means seeing what people say about you online and addressing any negative comments.
To sum up, the business world keeps changing rapidly, and so do the key activities in business model canvas that help a company do well.
The Business Model Canvas is a tool that helps businesses see and pick these tasks.
Whether it’s changing with new tech, listening to what customers say, or just looking again at what the company does, it’s clear that businesses need to be ready to change .
By always checking and changing the key activities in the business model canvas, companies can make sure they stay up-to-date, do well against others, and meet what their customers want.
As technology keeps changing how we do business, companies that keep their key activities updated will do the best .
For more insights on business planning and strategies, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA, 2023) offers a range of resources on how to create a business plan.
Trending news, 3 youngsters stole $243 million in bitcoin: here’s how they did it, tech jobs are drying up and an ai bubble burst could worsen things, revolut is launching a stablecoin: here’s why you might be interested in it, microplastics are invading our brains: here’s how to protect yourself, microsoft, blackrock seek $100 billion for ai: is ai a bubble, latest news, experts reveal up to 25% of rental inflation since 2020 is due to price-fixing.
The US rental housing market has experienced significant turmoil recently…
BlackRock along with Microsoft, Global Infrastructure Partners, and Abu Dhabi-backed…
Federal agents apprehended two individuals involved in a high-profile crypto…
Join the 150,000+ facilitators using SessionLab.
A step-by-step guide to planning a workshop, 54 great online tools for workshops and meetings, how to create an unforgettable training session in 8 simple steps.
Effective problem solving is all about using the right process and following a plan tailored to the issue at hand. Recognizing your team or organization has an issue isn’t enough to come up with effective problem solving strategies.
To truly understand a problem and develop appropriate solutions, you will want to follow a solid process, follow the necessary problem solving steps, and bring all of your problem solving skills to the table. We’ll forst look at what problem solving strategies you can employ with your team when looking for a way to approach the process. We’ll then discuss the problem solving skills you need to be more effective at solving problems, complete with an activity from the SessionLab library you can use to develop that skill in your team.
Let’s get to it!
What skills do i need to be an effective problem solver, how can i improve my problem solving skills.
Problem solving strategies are methods of approaching and facilitating the process of problem-solving with a set of techniques , actions, and processes. Different strategies are more effective if you are trying to solve broad problems such as achieving higher growth versus more focused problems like, how do we improve our customer onboarding process?
Broadly, the problem solving steps outlined above should be included in any problem solving strategy though choosing where to focus your time and what approaches should be taken is where they begin to differ. You might find that some strategies ask for the problem identification to be done prior to the session or that everything happens in the course of a one day workshop.
The key similarity is that all good problem solving strategies are structured and designed. Four hours of open discussion is never going to be as productive as a four-hour workshop designed to lead a group through a problem solving process.
Good problem solving strategies are tailored to the team, organization and problem you will be attempting to solve. Here are some example problem solving strategies you can learn from or use to get started.
Often, the first step to solving problems or organizational challenges is bringing a group together effectively. Most teams have the tools, knowledge, and expertise necessary to solve their challenges – they just need some guidance in how to use leverage those skills and a structure and format that allows people to focus their energies.
Facilitated workshops are one of the most effective ways of solving problems of any scale. By designing and planning your workshop carefully, you can tailor the approach and scope to best fit the needs of your team and organization.
Workshops are an effective strategy for solving problems. By using tried and test facilitation techniques and methods, you can design and deliver a workshop that is perfectly suited to the unique variables of your organization. You may only have the capacity for a half-day workshop and so need a problem solving process to match.
By using our session planner tool and importing methods from our library of 700+ facilitation techniques, you can create the right problem solving workshop for your team. It might be that you want to encourage creative thinking or look at things from a new angle to unblock your groups approach to problem solving. By tailoring your workshop design to the purpose, you can help ensure great results.
One of the main benefits of a workshop is the structured approach to problem solving. Not only does this mean that the workshop itself will be successful, but many of the methods and techniques will help your team improve their working processes outside of the workshop.
We believe that workshops are one of the best tools you can use to improve the way your team works together. Start with a problem solving workshop and then see what team building, culture or design workshops can do for your organization!
Great for:
By using design thinking principles and methods, a design sprint is a great way of identifying, prioritizing and prototyping solutions to long term challenges that can help solve major organizational problems with quick action and measurable results.
Some familiarity with design thinking is useful, though not integral, and this strategy can really help a team align if there is some discussion around which problems should be approached first.
The stage-based structure of the design sprint is also very useful for teams new to design thinking. The inspiration phase, where you look to competitors that have solved your problem, and the rapid prototyping and testing phases are great for introducing new concepts that will benefit a team in all their future work.
It can be common for teams to look inward for solutions and so looking to the market for solutions you can iterate on can be very productive. Instilling an agile prototyping and testing mindset can also be great when helping teams move forwards – generating and testing solutions quickly can help save time in the long run and is also pretty exciting!
Organizational challenges and problems are often complicated and large scale in nature. Sometimes, trying to resolve such an issue in one swoop is simply unachievable or overwhelming. Try breaking down such problems into smaller issues that you can work on step by step. You may not be able to solve the problem of churning customers off the bat, but you can work with your team to identify smaller effort but high impact elements and work on those first.
This problem solving strategy can help a team generate momentum, prioritize and get some easy wins. It’s also a great strategy to employ with teams who are just beginning to learn how to approach the problem solving process. If you want some insight into a way to employ this strategy, we recommend looking at our design sprint template below!
Some problems are best solved by introducing a major shift in perspective or by using new methodologies that encourage your team to think differently.
Props and tools such as Methodkit , which uses a card-based toolkit for facilitation, or Lego Serious Play can be great ways to engage your team and find an inclusive, democratic problem solving strategy. Remember that play and creativity are great tools for achieving change and whatever the challenge, engaging your participants can be very effective where other strategies may have failed.
LEGO Serious Play is a problem solving methodology designed to get participants thinking differently by using 3D models and kinesthetic learning styles. By physically building LEGO models based on questions and exercises, participants are encouraged to think outside of the box and create their own responses.
Collaborate LEGO Serious Play exercises are also used to encourage communication and build problem solving skills in a group. By using this problem solving process, you can often help different kinds of learners and personality types contribute and unblock organizational problems with creative thinking.
Problem solving strategies like LEGO Serious Play are super effective at helping a team solve more skills-based problems such as communication between teams or a lack of creative thinking. Some problems are not suited to LEGO Serious Play and require a different problem solving strategy.
Card decks and method kids are great tools for those new to facilitation or for whom facilitation is not the primary role. Card decks such as the emotional culture deck can be used for complete workshops and in many cases, can be used right out of the box. Methodkit has a variety of kits designed for scenarios ranging from personal development through to personas and global challenges so you can find the right deck for your particular needs.
Having an easy to use framework that encourages creativity or a new approach can take some of the friction or planning difficulties out of the workshop process and energize a team in any setting. Simplicity is the key with these methods. By ensuring everyone on your team can get involved and engage with the process as quickly as possible can really contribute to the success of your problem solving strategy.
Looking to peers, experts and external facilitators can be a great way of approaching the problem solving process. Your team may not have the necessary expertise, insights of experience to tackle some issues, or you might simply benefit from a fresh perspective. Some problems may require bringing together an entire team, and coaching managers or team members individually might be the right approach. Remember that not all problems are best resolved in the same manner.
If you’re a solo entrepreneur, peer groups, coaches and mentors can also be invaluable at not only solving specific business problems, but in providing a support network for resolving future challenges. One great approach is to join a Mastermind Group and link up with like-minded individuals and all grow together. Remember that however you approach the sourcing of external advice, do so thoughtfully, respectfully and honestly. Reciprocate where you can and prepare to be surprised by just how kind and helpful your peers can be!
Problem solving in large organizations with lots of skilled team members is one thing, but how about if you work for yourself or in a very small team without the capacity to get the most from a design sprint or LEGO Serious Play session?
A mastermind group – sometimes known as a peer advisory board – is where a group of people come together to support one another in their own goals, challenges, and businesses. Each participant comes to the group with their own purpose and the other members of the group will help them create solutions, brainstorm ideas, and support one another.
Mastermind groups are very effective in creating an energized, supportive atmosphere that can deliver meaningful results. Learning from peers from outside of your organization or industry can really help unlock new ways of thinking and drive growth. Access to the experience and skills of your peers can be invaluable in helping fill the gaps in your own ability, particularly in young companies.
A mastermind group is a great solution for solo entrepreneurs, small teams, or for organizations that feel that external expertise or fresh perspectives will be beneficial for them. It is worth noting that Mastermind groups are often only as good as the participants and what they can bring to the group. Participants need to be committed, engaged and understand how to work in this context.
Receiving advice from a business coach or building a mentor/mentee relationship can be an effective way of resolving certain challenges. The one-to-one format of most coaching and mentor relationships can really help solve the challenges those individuals are having and benefit the organization as a result.
A great mentor can be invaluable when it comes to spotting potential problems before they arise and coming to understand a mentee very well has a host of other business benefits. You might run an internal mentorship program to help develop your team’s problem solving skills and strategies or as part of a large learning and development program. External coaches can also be an important part of your problem solving strategy, filling skills gaps for your management team or helping with specific business issues.
Now we’ve explored the problem solving process and the steps you will want to go through in order to have an effective session, let’s look at the skills you and your team need to be more effective problem solvers.
Problem solving skills are highly sought after, whatever industry or team you work in. Organizations are keen to employ people who are able to approach problems thoughtfully and find strong, realistic solutions. Whether you are a facilitator , a team leader or a developer, being an effective problem solver is a skill you’ll want to develop.
Problem solving skills form a whole suite of techniques and approaches that an individual uses to not only identify problems but to discuss them productively before then developing appropriate solutions.
Here are some of the most important problem solving skills everyone from executives to junior staff members should learn. We’ve also included an activity or exercise from the SessionLab library that can help you and your team develop that skill.
If you’re running a workshop or training session to try and improve problem solving skills in your team, try using these methods to supercharge your process!
Active listening is one of the most important skills anyone who works with people can possess. In short, active listening is a technique used to not only better understand what is being said by an individual, but also to be more aware of the underlying message the speaker is trying to convey. When it comes to problem solving, active listening is integral for understanding the position of every participant and to clarify the challenges, ideas and solutions they bring to the table.
Some active listening skills include:
Active Listening #hyperisland #skills #active listening #remote-friendly This activity supports participants to reflect on a question and generate their own solutions using simple principles of active listening and peer coaching. It’s an excellent introduction to active listening but can also be used with groups that are already familiar with it. Participants work in groups of three and take turns being: “the subject”, the listener, and the observer.
All problem solving models require strong analytical skills, particularly during the beginning of the process and when it comes to analyzing how solutions have performed.
Analytical skills are primarily focused on performing an effective analysis by collecting, studying and parsing data related to a problem or opportunity.
It often involves spotting patterns, being able to see things from different perspectives and using observable facts and data to make suggestions or produce insight.
Analytical skills are also important at every stage of the problem solving process and by having these skills, you can ensure that any ideas or solutions you create or backed up analytically and have been sufficiently thought out.
Nine Whys #innovation #issue analysis #liberating structures With breathtaking simplicity, you can rapidly clarify for individuals and a group what is essentially important in their work. You can quickly reveal when a compelling purpose is missing in a gathering and avoid moving forward without clarity. When a group discovers an unambiguous shared purpose, more freedom and more responsibility are unleashed. You have laid the foundation for spreading and scaling innovations with fidelity.
Trying to solve problems on your own is difficult. Being able to collaborate effectively, with a free exchange of ideas, to delegate and be a productive member of a team is hugely important to all problem solving strategies.
Remember that whatever your role, collaboration is integral, and in a problem solving process, you are all working together to find the best solution for everyone.
Marshmallow challenge with debriefing #teamwork #team #leadership #collaboration In eighteen minutes, teams must build the tallest free-standing structure out of 20 sticks of spaghetti, one yard of tape, one yard of string, and one marshmallow. The marshmallow needs to be on top. The Marshmallow Challenge was developed by Tom Wujec, who has done the activity with hundreds of groups around the world. Visit the Marshmallow Challenge website for more information. This version has an extra debriefing question added with sample questions focusing on roles within the team.
Being an effective communicator means being empathetic, clear and succinct, asking the right questions, and demonstrating active listening skills throughout any discussion or meeting.
In a problem solving setting, you need to communicate well in order to progress through each stage of the process effectively. As a team leader, it may also fall to you to facilitate communication between parties who may not see eye to eye. Effective communication also means helping others to express themselves and be heard in a group.
Bus Trip #feedback #communication #appreciation #closing #thiagi #team This is one of my favourite feedback games. I use Bus Trip at the end of a training session or a meeting, and I use it all the time. The game creates a massive amount of energy with lots of smiles, laughs, and sometimes even a teardrop or two.
Creative problem solving skills can be some of the best tools in your arsenal. Thinking creatively, being able to generate lots of ideas and come up with out of the box solutions is useful at every step of the process.
The kinds of problems you will likely discuss in a problem solving workshop are often difficult to solve, and by approaching things in a fresh, creative manner, you can often create more innovative solutions.
Having practical creative skills is also a boon when it comes to problem solving. If you can help create quality design sketches and prototypes in record time, it can help bring a team to alignment more quickly or provide a base for further iteration.
The paper clip method #sharing #creativity #warm up #idea generation #brainstorming The power of brainstorming. A training for project leaders, creativity training, and to catalyse getting new solutions.
Critical thinking is one of the fundamental problem solving skills you’ll want to develop when working on developing solutions. Critical thinking is the ability to analyze, rationalize and evaluate while being aware of personal bias, outlying factors and remaining open-minded.
Defining and analyzing problems without deploying critical thinking skills can mean you and your team go down the wrong path. Developing solutions to complex issues requires critical thinking too – ensuring your team considers all possibilities and rationally evaluating them.
Agreement-Certainty Matrix #issue analysis #liberating structures #problem solving You can help individuals or groups avoid the frequent mistake of trying to solve a problem with methods that are not adapted to the nature of their challenge. The combination of two questions makes it possible to easily sort challenges into four categories: simple, complicated, complex , and chaotic . A problem is simple when it can be solved reliably with practices that are easy to duplicate. It is complicated when experts are required to devise a sophisticated solution that will yield the desired results predictably. A problem is complex when there are several valid ways to proceed but outcomes are not predictable in detail. Chaotic is when the context is too turbulent to identify a path forward. A loose analogy may be used to describe these differences: simple is like following a recipe, complicated like sending a rocket to the moon, complex like raising a child, and chaotic is like the game “Pin the Tail on the Donkey.” The Liberating Structures Matching Matrix in Chapter 5 can be used as the first step to clarify the nature of a challenge and avoid the mismatches between problems and solutions that are frequently at the root of chronic, recurring problems.
Though it shares lots of space with general analytical skills, data analysis skills are something you want to cultivate in their own right in order to be an effective problem solver.
Being good at data analysis doesn’t just mean being able to find insights from data, but also selecting the appropriate data for a given issue, interpreting it effectively and knowing how to model and present that data. Depending on the problem at hand, it might also include a working knowledge of specific data analysis tools and procedures.
Having a solid grasp of data analysis techniques is useful if you’re leading a problem solving workshop but if you’re not an expert, don’t worry. Bring people into the group who has this skill set and help your team be more effective as a result.
All problems need a solution and all solutions require that someone make the decision to implement them. Without strong decision making skills, teams can become bogged down in discussion and less effective as a result.
Making decisions is a key part of the problem solving process. It’s important to remember that decision making is not restricted to the leadership team. Every staff member makes decisions every day and developing these skills ensures that your team is able to solve problems at any scale. Remember that making decisions does not mean leaping to the first solution but weighing up the options and coming to an informed, well thought out solution to any given problem that works for the whole team.
Lightning Decision Jam (LDJ) #action #decision making #problem solving #issue analysis #innovation #design #remote-friendly The problem with anything that requires creative thinking is that it’s easy to get lost—lose focus and fall into the trap of having useless, open-ended, unstructured discussions. Here’s the most effective solution I’ve found: Replace all open, unstructured discussion with a clear process. What to use this exercise for: Anything which requires a group of people to make decisions, solve problems or discuss challenges. It’s always good to frame an LDJ session with a broad topic, here are some examples: The conversion flow of our checkout Our internal design process How we organise events Keeping up with our competition Improving sales flow
Most complex organizational problems require multiple people to be involved in delivering the solution. Ensuring that the team and organization can depend on you to take the necessary actions and communicate where necessary is key to ensuring problems are solved effectively.
Being dependable also means working to deadlines and to brief. It is often a matter of creating trust in a team so that everyone can depend on one another to complete the agreed actions in the agreed time frame so that the team can move forward together. Being undependable can create problems of friction and can limit the effectiveness of your solutions so be sure to bear this in mind throughout a project.
Team Purpose & Culture #team #hyperisland #culture #remote-friendly This is an essential process designed to help teams define their purpose (why they exist) and their culture (how they work together to achieve that purpose). Defining these two things will help any team to be more focused and aligned. With support of tangible examples from other companies, the team members work as individuals and a group to codify the way they work together. The goal is a visual manifestation of both the purpose and culture that can be put up in the team’s work space.
Emotional intelligence is an important skill for any successful team member, whether communicating internally or with clients or users. In the problem solving process, emotional intelligence means being attuned to how people are feeling and thinking, communicating effectively and being self-aware of what you bring to a room.
There are often differences of opinion when working through problem solving processes, and it can be easy to let things become impassioned or combative. Developing your emotional intelligence means being empathetic to your colleagues and managing your own emotions throughout the problem and solution process. Be kind, be thoughtful and put your points across care and attention.
Being emotionally intelligent is a skill for life and by deploying it at work, you can not only work efficiently but empathetically. Check out the emotional culture workshop template for more!
As we’ve clarified in our facilitation skills post, facilitation is the art of leading people through processes towards agreed-upon objectives in a manner that encourages participation, ownership, and creativity by all those involved. While facilitation is a set of interrelated skills in itself, the broad definition of facilitation can be invaluable when it comes to problem solving. Leading a team through a problem solving process is made more effective if you improve and utilize facilitation skills – whether you’re a manager, team leader or external stakeholder.
The Six Thinking Hats #creative thinking #meeting facilitation #problem solving #issue resolution #idea generation #conflict resolution The Six Thinking Hats are used by individuals and groups to separate out conflicting styles of thinking. They enable and encourage a group of people to think constructively together in exploring and implementing change, rather than using argument to fight over who is right and who is wrong.
Being flexible is a vital skill when it comes to problem solving. This does not mean immediately bowing to pressure or changing your opinion quickly: instead, being flexible is all about seeing things from new perspectives, receiving new information and factoring it into your thought process.
Flexibility is also important when it comes to rolling out solutions. It might be that other organizational projects have greater priority or require the same resources as your chosen solution. Being flexible means understanding needs and challenges across the team and being open to shifting or arranging your own schedule as necessary. Again, this does not mean immediately making way for other projects. It’s about articulating your own needs, understanding the needs of others and being able to come to a meaningful compromise.
The Creativity Dice #creativity #problem solving #thiagi #issue analysis Too much linear thinking is hazardous to creative problem solving. To be creative, you should approach the problem (or the opportunity) from different points of view. You should leave a thought hanging in mid-air and move to another. This skipping around prevents premature closure and lets your brain incubate one line of thought while you consciously pursue another.
Working in any group can lead to unconscious elements of groupthink or situations in which you may not wish to be entirely honest. Disagreeing with the opinions of the executive team or wishing to save the feelings of a coworker can be tricky to navigate, but being honest is absolutely vital when to comes to developing effective solutions and ensuring your voice is heard.
Remember that being honest does not mean being brutally candid. You can deliver your honest feedback and opinions thoughtfully and without creating friction by using other skills such as emotional intelligence.
Explore your Values #hyperisland #skills #values #remote-friendly Your Values is an exercise for participants to explore what their most important values are. It’s done in an intuitive and rapid way to encourage participants to follow their intuitive feeling rather than over-thinking and finding the “correct” values. It is a good exercise to use to initiate reflection and dialogue around personal values.
The problem solving process is multi-faceted and requires different approaches at certain points of the process. Taking initiative to bring problems to the attention of the team, collect data or lead the solution creating process is always valuable. You might even roadtest your own small scale solutions or brainstorm before a session. Taking initiative is particularly effective if you have good deal of knowledge in that area or have ownership of a particular project and want to get things kickstarted.
That said, be sure to remember to honor the process and work in service of the team. If you are asked to own one part of the problem solving process and you don’t complete that task because your initiative leads you to work on something else, that’s not an effective method of solving business challenges.
15% Solutions #action #liberating structures #remote-friendly You can reveal the actions, however small, that everyone can do immediately. At a minimum, these will create momentum, and that may make a BIG difference. 15% Solutions show that there is no reason to wait around, feel powerless, or fearful. They help people pick it up a level. They get individuals and the group to focus on what is within their discretion instead of what they cannot change. With a very simple question, you can flip the conversation to what can be done and find solutions to big problems that are often distributed widely in places not known in advance. Shifting a few grains of sand may trigger a landslide and change the whole landscape.
A particularly useful problem solving skill for product owners or managers is the ability to remain impartial throughout much of the process. In practice, this means treating all points of view and ideas brought forward in a meeting equally and ensuring that your own areas of interest or ownership are not favored over others.
There may be a stage in the process where a decision maker has to weigh the cost and ROI of possible solutions against the company roadmap though even then, ensuring that the decision made is based on merit and not personal opinion.
Empathy map #frame insights #create #design #issue analysis An empathy map is a tool to help a design team to empathize with the people they are designing for. You can make an empathy map for a group of people or for a persona. To be used after doing personas when more insights are needed.
Being a good leader means getting a team aligned, energized and focused around a common goal. In the problem solving process, strong leadership helps ensure that the process is efficient, that any conflicts are resolved and that a team is managed in the direction of success.
It’s common for managers or executives to assume this role in a problem solving workshop, though it’s important that the leader maintains impartiality and does not bulldoze the group in a particular direction. Remember that good leadership means working in service of the purpose and team and ensuring the workshop is a safe space for employees of any level to contribute. Take a look at our leadership games and activities post for more exercises and methods to help improve leadership in your organization.
Leadership Pizza #leadership #team #remote-friendly This leadership development activity offers a self-assessment framework for people to first identify what skills, attributes and attitudes they find important for effective leadership, and then assess their own development and initiate goal setting.
In the context of problem solving, mediation is important in keeping a team engaged, happy and free of conflict. When leading or facilitating a problem solving workshop, you are likely to run into differences of opinion. Depending on the nature of the problem, certain issues may be brought up that are emotive in nature.
Being an effective mediator means helping those people on either side of such a divide are heard, listen to one another and encouraged to find common ground and a resolution. Mediating skills are useful for leaders and managers in many situations and the problem solving process is no different.
Conflict Responses #hyperisland #team #issue resolution A workshop for a team to reflect on past conflicts, and use them to generate guidelines for effective conflict handling. The workshop uses the Thomas-Killman model of conflict responses to frame a reflective discussion. Use it to open up a discussion around conflict with a team.
Solving organizational problems is much more effective when following a process or problem solving model. Planning skills are vital in order to structure, deliver and follow-through on a problem solving workshop and ensure your solutions are intelligently deployed.
Planning skills include the ability to organize tasks and a team, plan and design the process and take into account any potential challenges. Taking the time to plan carefully can save time and frustration later in the process and is valuable for ensuring a team is positioned for success.
3 Action Steps #hyperisland #action #remote-friendly This is a small-scale strategic planning session that helps groups and individuals to take action toward a desired change. It is often used at the end of a workshop or programme. The group discusses and agrees on a vision, then creates some action steps that will lead them towards that vision. The scope of the challenge is also defined, through discussion of the helpful and harmful factors influencing the group.
As organisations grow, the scale and variation of problems they face multiplies. Your team or is likely to face numerous challenges in different areas and so having the skills to analyze and prioritize becomes very important, particularly for those in leadership roles.
A thorough problem solving process is likely to deliver multiple solutions and you may have several different problems you wish to solve simultaneously. Prioritization is the ability to measure the importance, value, and effectiveness of those possible solutions and choose which to enact and in what order. The process of prioritization is integral in ensuring the biggest challenges are addressed with the most impactful solutions.
Impact and Effort Matrix #gamestorming #decision making #action #remote-friendly In this decision-making exercise, possible actions are mapped based on two factors: effort required to implement and potential impact. Categorizing ideas along these lines is a useful technique in decision making, as it obliges contributors to balance and evaluate suggested actions before committing to them.
Some problem solving skills are utilized in a workshop or ideation phases, while others come in useful when it comes to decision making. Overseeing an entire problem solving process and ensuring its success requires strong project management skills.
While project management incorporates many of the other skills listed here, it is important to note the distinction of considering all of the factors of a project and managing them successfully. Being able to negotiate with stakeholders, manage tasks, time and people, consider costs and ROI, and tie everything together is massively helpful when going through the problem solving process.
Working out meaningful solutions to organizational challenges is only one part of the process. Thoughtfully documenting and keeping records of each problem solving step for future consultation is important in ensuring efficiency and meaningful change.
For example, some problems may be lower priority than others but can be revisited in the future. If the team has ideated on solutions and found some are not up to the task, record those so you can rule them out and avoiding repeating work. Keeping records of the process also helps you improve and refine your problem solving model next time around!
Personal Kanban #gamestorming #action #agile #project planning Personal Kanban is a tool for organizing your work to be more efficient and productive. It is based on agile methods and principles.
Conducting research to support both the identification of problems and the development of appropriate solutions is important for an effective process. Knowing where to go to collect research, how to conduct research efficiently, and identifying pieces of research are relevant are all things a good researcher can do well.
In larger groups, not everyone has to demonstrate this ability in order for a problem solving workshop to be effective. That said, having people with research skills involved in the process, particularly if they have existing area knowledge, can help ensure the solutions that are developed with data that supports their intention. Remember that being able to deliver the results of research efficiently and in a way the team can easily understand is also important. The best data in the world is only as effective as how it is delivered and interpreted.
Customer experience map #ideation #concepts #research #design #issue analysis #remote-friendly Customer experience mapping is a method of documenting and visualizing the experience a customer has as they use the product or service. It also maps out their responses to their experiences. To be used when there is a solution (even in a conceptual stage) that can be analyzed.
Managing risk is an often overlooked part of the problem solving process. Solutions are often developed with the intention of reducing exposure to risk or solving issues that create risk but sometimes, great solutions are more experimental in nature and as such, deploying them needs to be carefully considered.
Managing risk means acknowledging that there may be risks associated with more out of the box solutions or trying new things, but that this must be measured against the possible benefits and other organizational factors.
Be informed, get the right data and stakeholders in the room and you can appropriately factor risk into your decision making process.
Decisions, Decisions… #communication #decision making #thiagi #action #issue analysis When it comes to decision-making, why are some of us more prone to take risks while others are risk-averse? One explanation might be the way the decision and options were presented. This exercise, based on Kahneman and Tversky’s classic study , illustrates how the framing effect influences our judgement and our ability to make decisions . The participants are divided into two groups. Both groups are presented with the same problem and two alternative programs for solving them. The two programs both have the same consequences but are presented differently. The debriefing discussion examines how the framing of the program impacted the participant’s decision.
No single person is as good at problem solving as a team. Building an effective team and helping them come together around a common purpose is one of the most important problem solving skills, doubly so for leaders. By bringing a team together and helping them work efficiently, you pave the way for team ownership of a problem and the development of effective solutions.
In a problem solving workshop, it can be tempting to jump right into the deep end, though taking the time to break the ice, energize the team and align them with a game or exercise will pay off over the course of the day.
Remember that you will likely go through the problem solving process multiple times over an organization’s lifespan and building a strong team culture will make future problem solving more effective. It’s also great to work with people you know, trust and have fun with. Working on team building in and out of the problem solving process is a hallmark of successful teams that can work together to solve business problems.
9 Dimensions Team Building Activity #ice breaker #teambuilding #team #remote-friendly 9 Dimensions is a powerful activity designed to build relationships and trust among team members. There are 2 variations of this icebreaker. The first version is for teams who want to get to know each other better. The second version is for teams who want to explore how they are working together as a team.
The problem solving process is designed to lead a team from identifying a problem through to delivering a solution and evaluating its effectiveness. Without effective time management skills or timeboxing of tasks, it can be easy for a team to get bogged down or be inefficient.
By using a problem solving model and carefully designing your workshop, you can allocate time efficiently and trust that the process will deliver the results you need in a good timeframe.
Time management also comes into play when it comes to rolling out solutions, particularly those that are experimental in nature. Having a clear timeframe for implementing and evaluating solutions is vital for ensuring their success and being able to pivot if necessary.
Improving your skills at problem solving is often a career-long pursuit though there are methods you can use to make the learning process more efficient and to supercharge your problem solving skillset.
Remember that the skills you need to be a great problem solver have a large overlap with those skills you need to be effective in any role. Investing time and effort to develop your active listening or critical thinking skills is valuable in any context. Here are 7 ways to improve your problem solving skills.
Remember that your team is an excellent source of skills, wisdom, and techniques and that you should all take advantage of one another where possible. Best practices that one team has for solving problems, conducting research or making decisions should be shared across the organization. If you have in-house staff that have done active listening training or are data analysis pros, have them lead a training session.
Your team is one of your best resources. Create space and internal processes for the sharing of skills so that you can all grow together.
Once you’ve figured out you have a skills gap, the next step is to take action to fill that skills gap. That might be by asking your superior for training or coaching, or liaising with team members with that skill set. You might even attend specialized training for certain skills – active listening or critical thinking, for example, are business-critical skills that are regularly offered as part of a training scheme.
Whatever method you choose, remember that taking action of some description is necessary for growth. Whether that means practicing, getting help, attending training or doing some background reading, taking active steps to improve your skills is the way to go.
Problem solving can be complicated, particularly when attempting to solve large problems for the first time. Using a problem solving process helps give structure to your problem solving efforts and focus on creating outcomes, rather than worrying about the format.
Tools such as the seven-step problem solving process above are effective because not only do they feature steps that will help a team solve problems, they also develop skills along the way. Each step asks for people to engage with the process using different skills and in doing so, helps the team learn and grow together. Group processes of varying complexity and purpose can also be found in the SessionLab library of facilitation techniques . Using a tried and tested process and really help ease the learning curve for both those leading such a process, as well as those undergoing the purpose.
Effective teams make decisions about where they should and shouldn’t expend additional effort. By using a problem solving process, you can focus on the things that matter, rather than stumbling towards a solution haphazardly.
Some skills gaps are more obvious than others. It’s possible that your perception of your active listening skills differs from those of your colleagues.
It’s valuable to create a system where team members can provide feedback in an ordered and friendly manner so they can all learn from one another. Only by identifying areas of improvement can you then work to improve them.
Remember that feedback systems require oversight and consideration so that they don’t turn into a place to complain about colleagues. Design the system intelligently so that you encourage the creation of learning opportunities, rather than encouraging people to list their pet peeves.
While practice might not make perfect, it does make the problem solving process easier. If you are having trouble with critical thinking, don’t shy away from doing it. Get involved where you can and stretch those muscles as regularly as possible.
Problem solving skills come more naturally to some than to others and that’s okay. Take opportunities to get involved and see where you can practice your skills in situations outside of a workshop context. Try collaborating in other circumstances at work or conduct data analysis on your own projects. You can often develop those skills you need for problem solving simply by doing them. Get involved!
Learn from the best. Our library of 700+ facilitation techniques is full of activities and methods that help develop the skills you need to be an effective problem solver. Check out our templates to see how to approach problem solving and other organizational challenges in a structured and intelligent manner.
There is no single approach to improving problem solving skills, but by using the techniques employed by others you can learn from their example and develop processes that have seen proven results.
Using tried and tested exercises that you know well can help deliver results, but you do run the risk of missing out on the learning opportunities offered by new approaches. As with the problem solving process, changing your mindset can remove blockages and be used to develop your problem solving skills.
Most teams have members with mixed skill sets and specialties. Mix people from different teams and share skills and different points of view. Teach your customer support team how to use design thinking methods or help your developers with conflict resolution techniques. Try switching perspectives with facilitation techniques like Flip It! or by using new problem solving methodologies or models. Give design thinking, liberating structures or lego serious play a try if you want to try a new approach. You will find that framing problems in new ways and using existing skills in new contexts can be hugely useful for personal development and improving your skillset. It’s also a lot of fun to try new things. Give it a go!
Encountering business challenges and needing to find appropriate solutions is not unique to your organization. Lots of very smart people have developed methods, theories and approaches to help develop problem solving skills and create effective solutions. Learn from them!
Books like The Art of Thinking Clearly , Think Smarter, or Thinking Fast, Thinking Slow are great places to start, though it’s also worth looking at blogs related to organizations facing similar problems to yours, or browsing for success stories. Seeing how Dropbox massively increased growth and working backward can help you see the skills or approach you might be lacking to solve that same problem. Learning from others by reading their stories or approaches can be time-consuming but ultimately rewarding.
A tired, distracted mind is not in the best position to learn new skills. It can be tempted to burn the candle at both ends and develop problem solving skills outside of work. Absolutely use your time effectively and take opportunities for self-improvement, though remember that rest is hugely important and that without letting your brain rest, you cannot be at your most effective.
Creating distance between yourself and the problem you might be facing can also be useful. By letting an idea sit, you can find that a better one presents itself or you can develop it further. Take regular breaks when working and create a space for downtime. Remember that working smarter is preferable to working harder and that self-care is important for any effective learning or improvement process.
Now we’ve explored some of the key problem solving skills and the problem solving steps necessary for an effective process, you’re ready to begin developing more effective solutions and leading problem solving workshops.
Need more inspiration? Check out our post on problem solving activities you can use when guiding a group towards a great solution in your next workshop or meeting. Have questions? Did you have a great problem solving technique you use with your team? Get in touch in the comments below. We’d love to chat!
James Smart is Head of Content at SessionLab. He’s also a creative facilitator who has run workshops and designed courses for establishments like the National Centre for Writing, UK. He especially enjoys working with young people and empowering others in their creative practice.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Going from a mere idea to a workshop that delivers results for your clients can feel like a daunting task. In this piece, we will shine a light on all the work behind the scenes and help you learn how to plan a workshop from start to finish. On a good day, facilitation can feel like effortless magic, but that is mostly the result of backstage work, foresight, and a lot of careful planning. Read on to learn a step-by-step approach to breaking the process of planning a workshop into small, manageable chunks. The flow starts with the first meeting with a client to define the purposes of a workshop.…
Effective online tools are a necessity for smooth and engaging virtual workshops and meetings. But how do you choose the right ones? Do you sometimes feel that the good old pen and paper or MS Office toolkit and email leaves you struggling to stay on top of managing and delivering your workshop? Fortunately, there are plenty of great workshop tools to make your life easier when you need to facilitate a meeting and lead workshops. In this post, we’ll share our favorite online tools you can use to make your life easier and run better workshops and meetings. In fact, there are plenty of free online workshop tools and meeting…
How does learning work? A clever 9-year-old once told me: “I know I am learning something new when I am surprised.” The science of adult learning tells us that, in order to learn new skills (which, unsurprisingly, is harder for adults to do than kids) grown-ups need to first get into a specific headspace. In a business, this approach is often employed in a training session where employees learn new skills or work on professional development. But how do you ensure your training is effective? In this guide, we'll explore how to create an effective training session plan and run engaging training sessions. As team leader, project manager, or consultant,…
Join the 150,000 facilitators using SessionLab
Sign up for free
Email address error, valid email error.
Season's Discount Offer
Top 10 problem solving activities that your team should perform today.
Irrespective of who you are and what you do, you will encounter problems. Some of you might see it as a hurdle while others might treat it as an opportunity. No matter how you think about problems, it is important to hone your problem solving skills so you can overcome roadblocks in your personal and professional lives.
In this article, you will learn about ten problem solving activities that your team should actively participate in to get better at solving complex problems.
Here are ten problem solving activities you should try today.
If every member of your team is moving in different directions and don’t collaborate with other team members, this is the activity you should perform. It will foster team collaboration and cohesion.
Divide the participants into several teams and ask them to build a tower by using sticks of uncooked spaghetti, masking tape, which can stand on its own. Make the challenge more interesting by asking them to put a marshmallow on top. Keep a short time limit and see how your team collaborate to create the tallest tower.
Instead of giving your team a single challenge to complete, you should increase the complexity of challenge by multiplying the number of activities. Divide the participants into two teams and ask each time to complete a set of tasks. Use a task management software or pen or paper to create To-Do list and make sure that tasks are arranged in ascending order based on complexity.
Make sure the easiest task is listed on the top and the hardest task is present at the bottom of the list. The team that completes all the activities wins. For instance, you can hide multiple items on the floor, provide a list of items to the teams and ask them to go on a scavenger hunt and find each and every item. Every item that they found gives a clue and asks the participants to find the next treasure.
Lack of decision-making skills can paralyze your team, put the brakes on your thinking. If you want to get out of this mental block or polish your decision-making skills, then this activity is for you. All you need is an egg, some construction materials such as straws, rubber, sticks, plastic wrap, tape, etc.
Teams must choose construction materials and create a carrier which can hold an egg. Once done, ask each team to drop their carrier with an egg in it from a height and see which carrier successfully manages to protect an egg from breaking.
Select a full-size picture of a well-known personality. Cut the picture into multiple square shapes. Give each piece to a team member along with a pencil, colored markers and a ruler. Now, ask them to turn the puzzle piece they have into a five-time larger image and see what they do.
Another activity that can enhance your team collaboration is an escape. For this activity, you will need a rope, a key, a room and few clues or puzzles. Lock team members inside a room and ask them to find clues hidden in the room. Once they have found all the clues, they should find the key and escape the room. Hide the key and the list of clues in a secret location. Give your team anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour for this activity.
Create two teams with an equal number of members. You might need four 2×6 board for this problem-solving activity. Place two boards end to end and other two boards in parallel few feet away from the first two boards. Teams must push other boards forward while standing on one board. The real challenge is that you don’t have to get off the board you are standing on while doing so. If a team does that, they must start again. The team that successfully push the board beyond the finish line wins.
This activity helps with adaptability and collaboration. Tell team members to stand in a pyramid shape horizontally. Now, force them to flip the base and apex of the pyramid just by moving three people. It is a great activity, especially if you have many small teams competing with one another. It will clearly show which team is better at creating a reverse pyramid faster. The team that does that wins.
This activity involves spreading all the items such as chairs, water bottles, bags and boxes in an empty room in such a way that participants cannot go from one end of the room to another. Each team consists of two members. One is blindfolded while the other one is not. The person who is seeing everything should guide his blindfolded partner from one end of the room to another without touching any of the objects by giving out instructions. This activity will enhance communication and collaboration between your team members.
Don’t get scared by the name of this problem solving activity because it as interesting as other activities on this list. It can improve your decision-making skills as well as show your team how to adapt according to the different situations. To perform this activity, you will need a packet of construction material, an electric fan and a blindfold.
Create five-member teams and let them choose a leader to guide them. Every team is required to build a shelter by using construction material within half an hour. The leaders cannot help their teams physically because they have frostbite. On the other hand, team members have snow blindness. Once the 30 minutes time ends, turn on the fan to see which shelter blows away by winds and which ones are not. The team that makes a shelter which manages to stay firm despite the winds, win.
Make everyone stand in such a way that it forms a circle. Now, ask every team member to hold hands with two people who are not next to them. This will result in a tangle and it will mimic a human knot. Once all the participants are in a tangle, ask them to untangle and come back to their previous state, which is to form the circle again, but the catch is that they don’t have to let go of anyone’s hand while doing so. Such group problem-solving scenarios will help your team adapt according to situation.
Use TaskQue , a smart task management software that helps you complete tasks more efficienlty.
Have you tried any of the team building problem solving activities mentioned above at work? Do you have any team building ideas that people would love to know? If yes, then share them with other readers in the comments section below.
Conquering the chaos: how hr management software streamlines efficiency, how to fall asleep fast more rest means greater productivity, 7 project recovery techniques when you feel like the project is getting out of hands, leave a reply cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
The key aspects of departmentalization for business enterprises, how to keep your team in sync and productive, is situational leadership the best leadership style, 7 emotional intelligence hacks to help you become a better leader, editor picks, 7 project recovery techniques when you feel like the project is..., popular posts, top 15 leadership qualities that make good leaders (2024), 6 inspiring leadership traits of barack obama, top 10 project management blogs to follow in 2020, popular category.
Now offering up to 20% OFF Employer of Record (EOR) services
Get in touch
Speed up your global expansion! Expand smartly in 150+ countries with the #1 rated EOR globally.
Explore Multiplier EOR
Share Article
All Blogs Remote & Global Workforce
10 Mins Approx
Imagine this: You are neck-deep in work, fueled by a questionable amount of coffee, when a hilarious cat video interrupts your team chat. Laughter erupts across the virtual divide, momentarily breaking focus and uplifting mood.
That’s the magic of team cohesion in a remote setting.
Like galaxies, virtual teams are composed of individual stars that shine brightly despite vast distances. However, unlike stars, remote teams need more than just individual brilliance to thrive. They require a cohesive structure, effective communication, and a shared vision to navigate the challenges of their vast digital expanse.
Without the watercooler chats and shared lunches of a physical office, building strong bonds can feel like trying to herd digital kittens — adorable, but a chaotic challenge.
Virtual team-building aims to foster connections, create a sense of belonging, build trust, understand each other’s work styles, and establish an environment where teammates feel comfortable sharing ideas, regardless of their significance.
Virtual team-building activities should take precedence when it comes to employee well-being as it’s known to boost team spirit and keep remote work blues away.
Here are some ways to get the ball rolling.
These activities are designed to provide a refreshing break from mundane video calls and emails, sparking curiosity and promoting a more vibrant and enjoyable remote work environment.
Ever folded paper into a crane or a toad? Origami challenges are a creative and relaxing way to bond with remote teams. Imagine the laughter and friendly banter as all attempt to master intricate folds and shapes together.
Why not learn a new origami design as a team or spice things up with a competition to see who can craft the most unique folded masterpiece?
It’s a surprising test of concentration and clear communication — following instructions solely through voice chat is bound to lead to some hilarious misshapen creations and a flock of oddly contorted paper birds.
But that’s all part of the fun.
Curious to turn team chats into a vibrant window into everyone’s world? The ‘Photo of the Day’ challenge is a fun and creative way to let teammates peek into each other’s lives.
Here’s how it works: every day, a different person shares a snapshot they’ve captured, along with the story behind it.
It could be anything – their quirky work-from-home setup, a breathtaking sunset view, or even their pet’s latest hilarious antic. Just imagine the laughter, the “oohs” and “aahs,” and the conversations that’ll spark from these daily glimpses into each other’s worlds.
The best part? It’s a breeze to set up.
Simply create a dedicated channel on the team chat platform like Slack or Teams, and let the photo-sharing shenanigans unfold.
Bond over shared experiences, inside jokes, and a deeper understanding of what makes remote teammates tick – one candid snapshot at a time.
Virtual painting is the perfect team-building activity that blends creativity, connection, and laughter.
Led by a virtual instructor, team members follow step-by-step instructions to craft their own masterpieces. Just imagine the fun of comparing artistic visions and teams gently poking fun at each other’s abstract interpretation of a tree.
This activity is a fantastic way to relax, bond with teammates, and discover hidden artistic talents. The best part? It’s a breeze to set up using video platforms like Zoom or Microsoft Teams.
Whether they’re a seasoned painter or a complete novice, virtual painting promises an evening of laughter, camaraderie, and maybe even a few accidental masterpieces.
From tricky client requests to unexpected technical glitches, problem-solving is a must-have skill for any team.
Enter problem-solving activities.
These global teamwork exercises test a team’s thinking muscles and unearth creative solutions, ditching the mundane meeting room and bonding over shared mind-bending missions. Imagine the buzz as teams toss around wild ideas, cracking codes, navigating virtual escape rooms, or piecing together clues.
These activities will leave them laughing, pondering, and high-fiving their way to the solution, flexing those problem-solving muscles and unlocking a whole new level of remote team cohesion.
This activity is about reliving childhood adventures of cracking codes and solving puzzles to escape a locked room.
Virtual escape rooms bring that same heart-pounding thrill online, perfect for boosting remote team cohesion. Teams work together to conquer tough digital challenges and “escape” the virtual room.
It’s an absolute blast for building communication, fostering cooperation, and flexing those critical thinking muscles — all while sharing plenty of good laughs. These virtual team-building activities are a surefire way to strengthen cultural integration across global teams.
After all, there’s no better bonding experience than joining forces to overcome a shared mission, even if it’s a simulated one.
So, why not inject some excitement into the next remote team management strategy? Virtual escape rooms promise an adrenaline-pumping, problem-solving adventure that’ll have your global teamwork hitting new heights.
Another virtual team-building activity that’ll have teams’ competitive spirits soaring. Coworker Feud, the digital spin on the classic game show Family Feud, is a surefire way to ignite that fire and strengthen remote team cohesion.
Just like the original, players go head-to-head, battling wits to guess the most popular answers to a series of thought-provoking questions. It’s a fast-paced, high-energy showdown that sharpens communication skills and gets global teams thinking on their toes.
As teammates banter back and forth, exchanging friendly cheers and jabs, cultural integration takes shape. Coworker Feud is the perfect icebreaker for letting personalities shine across time zones.
Introducing this level of fun to remote team management strategy promises more than just laughs. It builds the bonds that turn colleagues into a tight-knit crew, united in overcoming challenges together.
This activity throws your team into a deserted island scenario, but with a twist – they only have a handful of random objects to help them survive.
The challenge? To work together and rank the objects based on their usefulness.
It starts with individual brainstorming, then teams come together to decide which tools are most crucial. Lost at Sea is a fantastic way to boost decision-making, collaboration, and critical thinking – all while stranded on an island.
Try the Hunt is a virtual team-building activity that’ll put global teams’ problem-solving capabilities to the ultimate test.
This online game throws a mix of riddles, intriguing pictures, and brain teasers.
Working together against the clock, players must collaborate and strategize to claim victory. It’s a pressure-cooker scenario demanding clear communication and creative thinking.
The Hunt is the perfect remote team cohesion activity for smaller squads. As challenges increase, bonds tighten — an effective way to foster cultural integration and remote team management.
Building a strong and successful global team requires embracing the unique backgrounds and cultures of each member.
Virtual team-building activities that celebrate this diversity are a fantastic way to foster a sense of connection and understanding across borders.
Here are some engaging ideas to get started.
Divide teams into groups and assign each group a cultural “myth” or stereotype from a different country.
The groups research the myth’s origin and validity and then present their findings to the team.
This activity encourages critical thinking, dismantles stereotypes, and fosters an appreciation for cultural nuances.
Present a common product like a water bottle or toothbrush and challenge teams to redesign it for a specific cultural market.
Participants need to consider factors like traditional materials, aesthetics, functionality, and social norms.
This sparks creativity, problem-solving skills, and an understanding of how cultural preferences influence design.
Instead of words, use proverbs, idioms, or cultural symbols for virtual Pictionary.
This challenges a team’s knowledge of different cultures and encourages creative expression. Bonus points if the team can explain the meaning or origin of the proverb or symbol they’re depicting.
Celebrate the linguistic talents within a team; dedicate an hour to conversations in different languages.
Team members can take turns teaching basic phrases in their native tongue, share cultural anecdotes, or simply engage in conversation.
This is a fantastic opportunity to appreciate the diverse linguistic abilities within the team and a proven way to break down communication barriers.
Invite team members to share a traditional dish from their culture, complete with a recipe and its significance.
This activity allows everyone to learn about different cuisines and cultural traditions, while also creating a space for members to share a part of their heritage.
In today’s fast-paced world, teams often struggle to step back and reflect on their work. This can hinder growth and lead to valuable lessons being unlearned.
Virtual reflection meetings offer a powerful solution, fostering open communication and shared learning in a convenient online format.
Imagine a space where team members can discuss recent projects, not just deliverables, but how they approached them. This honest exchange allows for:
By openly discussing challenges and successes, teams build trust and understanding, learning from each other’s experiences and fostering better collaboration in future projects.
Reflection meetings encourage active listening and clear communication. Team members learn to articulate their thoughts and perspectives effectively, leading to smoother collaboration across projects.
Reflecting on experiences allows individuals to identify areas for personal growth. This self-awareness empowers them to take ownership of their professional development.
By reflecting on client interactions, teams can identify areas for improvement. This leads to a more seamless client experience and strengthens long-term partnerships.
Virtual reflection meetings offer several advantages over traditional in-person gatherings. They eliminate geographical barriers, allowing participation from remote team members.
Additionally, they bring about anonymity through online surveys or polls that encourage more candid responses. They can also be easily recorded, creating a valuable resource for future reference.
Here’s how to implement virtual reflection meetings effectively:
Determine a meeting cadence that suits your team’s workflow. Weekly reflections might be ideal for fast-paced environments, while monthly sessions work well for longer-term projects.
Choose a topic for reflection. It could be a specific project, a recurring challenge, or a general aspect of team collaboration.
Assign roles like facilitator, learner (who shares an experience), timekeeper, and notetaker to ensure a smooth and focused discussion.
Craft questions that spark deep thinking and encourage open dialogue. Share them beforehand so team members can come prepared.
Cultivate a supportive environment. Set clear ground rules emphasizing mutual respect and non-judgment.
Distributed work is the new normal, and fostering a strong company culture across borders is essential. Team-building activities are crucial for this, but how do you plan and execute them effectively across different time zones?
Technology has provided a treasure trove of tools to bridge the physical gap: through communication platforms, allowing real-time interactions; via project management software, keeping everyone on the same page; and by way of interactive whiteboards and online games, transforming virtual meetings into engaging experiences.
But to (really) take remote team management to the next level, you need to consider platforms like Multiplier.
As a global Employer of Record (EOR), it takes care of the complexities of hiring and managing international teams . This frees you up to focus on building a strong company culture.
Here’s how Multiplier streamlines virtual team building across multiple time zones.
Virtual team-building activities are a fun way to boost morale, break the ice, and create a sense of community despite physical distance. These activities can be simple and free, like online trivia or emoji contests, or more elaborate planned events.
The key is to find activities that are inclusive and engaging for your team, regardless of location or time zone. By taking the time to step away from work and connect on a personal level, you’ll foster stronger relationships and a more cohesive unit.
This translates to a more motivated team, ready to collaborate and tackle any challenge, be it across the country or around the world.
Through Multiplier EOR , you can hire talented, driven international candidates for your business.
What’s more, by transferring complex tasks like payroll, compliance , onboarding, freelancer hiring , visa and immigration support , and employee ESOP s administration to Multiplier, you’ll have more time to invest in what matters most — building a strong, collaborative, and engaged global workforce to drive your vision forward.
Ready to experience global teamwork like never before?
Speak to us today for a demo.
Creating remote teams should be fairly easy with our solutions
Content Writer
Will is a Content Writer at Multiplier. With a background in technology journalism, he is passionate about busting jargon, getting to the heart of complex topics, and writing pieces you'll enjoy reading.
Stay ahead with worklife. unlimited..
By clicking “Subscribe”, I accept the terms and privacy policy .
Related articles
3 Mins Approx
7 Mins Approx
4 Mins Approx
We’re ready to grow your business
Countries to access and employ from
In-house legal and tax experts
Dedicated customer support
Employer of Record
Global Payroll
Contractors
Immigration
By use case
Expand globally
Stay compliant
Finance teams
By company size
Enterprises
Customer stories
What is EOR
Events and webinars
Product demos
Talent trends
Job description templates
Employment guides
Work permits
Multiplier vs Deel
Multiplier vs Remote
Multiplier vs Oyster HR
Multiplier vs Velocity Global
Multiplier vs Globalization Partners
Multiplier + TriNet
Help center
Contact support
Contact sales
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
© Copyright Multiplier 2024 — All rights reserved
The Spinoza – Ilyenkov solution and causal powers realism
You have full access to this open access article
The celebrated Russian philosopher, Evald Ilyenkov, draws on Spinoza to solve a key philosophical problem: how exactly does the mind connect to the real world? However, the proposed solution has come under much criticism, for example in a recent special issue of Studies of East European Thought (74, 3). This paper aims to clearly explain the solution, overcoming misunderstandings that are evident in the special issue. The kernel of the solution is an argument that human cognition rests on practical activity. In practical activity humans do not act on a fixed structure within their own bodies, in the manner, say, that the activity of water is determined by its fixed structure, H 2 O. Instead, human practical activity directly connects with and continually adapts to the structures and causal powers of external bodies. Awareness of practical activity thereby gives the human mind access to a mode of activity that is in direct contact and ever-greater accordance with the objects of the real world. The paper will elaborate and develop this kernel, with particular attention to the notion of ‘causal powers’ that it contains, by drawing from the revival in philosophy and the social sciences of what has been termed ‘causal powers realism’. The paper thereby opens new insights and connections regarding the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, alleviating the potential for misunderstandings evident in the special issue.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
One does not need to be a philosopher, a social theorist, nor an academic to wonder how exactly our ideas, our theories, our formulas, etc. connect with the real world. Philosophy, though, can reasonably be expected to provide an answer to this question. Evald Ilyenkov is a celebrated Russian philosopher who develops an answer by drawing on Spinoza. However, a recent special issue in this journal (see Oittinen 2022a ) could give the impression that the answer given by Ilyenkov does not improve on answers given in Western philosophical traditions that draw on Descartes, Hume, and Kant. Contributors to the special issue argue that Ilyenkov does not accurately interpret Spinoza (Bowring 2022 ; Maidansky 2022 ), that Ilyenkov’s mistaken interpretation fails to solve the problem of how mind and world connect (Maidansky 2022 ), and that Spinoza’s own solution is highly suspect (Oittinen 2022a , b ). These critical assessments are now significantly influencing the fast-growing global reception of Ilyenkov’s work (for example, Callinicos 2023 approvingly cites Bowring, and Jacobs 2024 approvingly cites Maidansky.) The aim of this paper is to show, contra the impression that could be given by the special issue, that Spinoza and Ilyenkov are aligned and, more important, that they offer a basis to solve the problem of how mind connects to world.
The kernel of the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is an argument that human cognition rests on practical activity. In practical activity humans do not act on a fixed structure within their own bodies. Instead, human practical activity directly connects with and continually adapts to the structures and causal powers of external bodies. Awareness of practical activity thereby gives the human mind direct access to a mode of activity that is in direct contact and ever-greater accordance with the objects of the real world. In philosophical terminology, consideration of practical activity provides an argument for ‘direct realism’ – a direct connection of mind to world. Arguments for direct realism have become popular in contemporary philosophy and cognitive science (Di Paolo and Potapov 2024 ). What is distinctive about the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is that it argues for direct access of mind not just to mind-independent events , but to the mind-independent casual powers and essential structures that generate events. In doing so the solution contributes to ‘causal powers realism’, (e.g., Groff and Morgan 2023 ) a burgeoning philosophical doctrine hitherto overlooked in Ilyenkov studies – a lacuna that this paper will fill.
The Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is highly abstract. Ilyenkov’s ( 1977 ) philosophical masterwork, Dialectical Logic , develops the solution fundamentally to incorporate the productive role of human labour and socio-material culture, or so it will be argued below. However, Maidansky ( 2022 ) argues that Ilyenkov in fact swiftly abandons rather than develops the abstract solution. This paper will introduce and draw upon causal powers realism to explain why the abstract Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is needed and to sketch how it is developed by Ilyenkov. However, it must be acknowledged at the outset that a sketch is not a definitive refutation of Maidansky’s critique. To achieve such a definitive refutation in the space of a single paper would no more be possible than to definitively refute a critic of Marx’s Capital who denies that it is possible to develop from the starting point of the ‘commodity’ to the many forms of ‘capital’. Rather than definitive refutation, the aim is to clarify the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution and its development, by drawing upon causal powers realism, adding a fresh perspective to important previous expositions of the solution (e.g., Surmava 2018 , and Surmava and Simakin 2021 ) and so to further debate on this foundational topic.
The paper proceeds as follows: the next section will explain the problem in the context of an introduction to causal powers realism. The following section will explain the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution. The penultimate section will respond to criticisms to this solution. The final section will summarise and conclude, briefly indicating exciting avenues the solution opens up, such as in the field of artificial intelligence.
Historical context.
Causal powers realism was inherited from Aristotle by Spinoza (Viljanen 2008 ). After Hume’s influential rejection of causal powers realism, the doctrine was shunned by mainstream philosophy for a period of centuries, only to be revived (in diverse new forms) in recent decades (Groff and Greco 2013 ; Hill, Lagerlund and Psillos 2021 ; Jacobs 2017 ). In radical Western philosophy, causal powers realism is central to a movement known as ‘critical realism’. Footnote 1 Initially synthesised by Roy Bhaskar ( 1975 , 1979 ), critical realism became significant across Marxism and the social sciences from the late 1970s to the present (particularly in the UK and Europe). As regards mainstream Western philosophy, causal powers realism remained largely forgotten until the 1990s (an exception being the work of Rom Harré, e.g., Harré and Madden 1975 .) It has since become a vibrant mainstream topic, a revival initiated by, amongst others, Brian Ellis, Nancy Cartwright and Stephen Mumford (see Groff and Morgan 2023 , and references below). Footnote 2 Thus, when Bakhurst ( 1991 ) introduced Ilyenkov to a Western audience, causal powers realism was not yet revived in mainstream Western philosophy. A comparison between the newly revived causal powers realism and Ilyenkov’s philosophy has not previously been undertaken. Footnote 3
For a simple and intuitive entry point to causal powers realism, consider a drink of water. Water has the power to quench my thirst, amongst many other powers such as boiling at 100 degrees, putting out fires, and so on. Water has these powers regardless of what I think about it and regardless of whether the powers are exercised. Furthermore, science has explained the powers of water by discovering the essential nature or structure of water, H 2 O, in virtue of which the powers of water are necessarily possessed. According to causal powers realism, this analysis of water and its causal powers can be generalised to many other kinds of thing. For causal powers realism there are many ‘natural kinds’, each with characteristic and necessary natures and powers, that it is the job of science to uncover, explain and define, just as science has done for water. Spinoza was writing before the advent of modern chemistry, so does not employ the example of H 2 O, but instead refers to the powers and structures of bodies drawn from the physics of his day, and to the nature and powers of humanity – the human mind being his primary focus in the Ethics .
A key element of causal powers realism of strong relevance to Spinoza concerns the identity of different aspects or levels of reality (Bula 2019 ; Evenden 2012 ; Knio 2018 ). According to causal powers realism, it is equally as valid to say (i) ‘I quench my thirst through drinking water’ as it is to say (ii) ‘H 2 O molecules interact with my metabolic system helping to sustain me’. It is equally valid because when I drink water then H 2 O molecules interact with my metabolic system. The same event can be described at two different levels – the level of molecular structure (where the power is explained ) and the level of everyday human activity (where it is displayed .) The second description of the event is not reducible to the first nor vice versa because the two descriptions respectively give different information about, by revealing different aspects of, the event. When we have explained the powers of water in terms of H 2 O, we have not somehow dissolved those powers. Water really quenches my thirst; H 2 O molecules really interact with my metabolic system helping to sustain me. If I only know one of the two descriptions my knowledge is impoverished because I only know one aspect of the event, when there are more. Thus, causal powers realism is anti-reductionist. This anti-reductionist principle, respecting the irreducibility of different levels of one single reality, is sometimes called the principle of ‘emergence’.
To understand the Spinoza-Ilyenkov account of the problem of how mind connects to the world we can begin early in the Ethics (Appendix to Part 1) where Spinoza undertakes a critique of sense experience (what he calls ‘imagination’). Spinoza’s critique can be understood as a preliminary application of causal powers realism to the nature of the connection between mind and world. Let us return to our simple example of water, this time focusing on the way I perceive the water. What I think I see is the glass of water next to me; I do not think I see the play of light it causes on my retina. Similarly, I think I hear the water boiling in the kettle, not the vibrations in my ear due to sound waves from the kettle. Or, again, I think I smell the lemon from the lemon flavouring of the water, not the excitations in my nose that the lemon flavouring causes. Thus, definite motions that are spatially located in the human body (e.g., vibrations in the ear) are perceived by the mind as qualitatively rich properties of objects that are located outside of the human body (hearing water boiling). The anti-reductionist stance of causal powers realism here applies to the ‘experience’ of a ‘mind’, explained by, but not reducible to, spatially definite motion within the human body (the sense organs, in connection with the brain and central nervous system).
The implications of this causal analysis of perception are philosophically troubling. Spinoza ( 2023 , Appendix to Part 1) puts it as follows: when we act on sense experience we are acting on ‘confused’ and ‘chaotic’ ideas. In sense experience, ideas of motions within our bodies (within the sense organs) masquerade as ideas of the external bodies themselves. We mistake ideas of the internal motions within our bodies, with ideas of external things. Yet, the internal motions of our sense organs are the effects of external objects on us, which, in general, are entirely different to their causes , the structures and powers of external objects. The play of light on my retina caused by my glass of water is entirely different to the essential structure and powers of water. Sense experience never gives us direct awareness of the essential natures of external objects, it reveals only the inner motions of our sense organs.
Spinoza does not press the point in the manner Hume did a century later, but it is easy to see how Spinoza’s critique of sense perception leads to scepticism about the external world. According to causal powers realism, what external bodies will do next depends on their essential structures and powers. But the causal analysis of sense perception has concluded that sense perception does not reveal these structures and powers. Therefore, the causal analysis implies that sense experience tells us nothing about what external objects will do next. If I only have access to my glass of water via sense experience, then the true nature of my glass of water is unknown to me – so it would be miraculous that when I drink it, then, just like last time, it quenches my thirst. The same is true for all external objects. If we act solely on the basis of sense experience, the accordance of our activity with external objects would be impossible to explain except as mere coincidence, a coincidence that could not be counted on in the future. Our unshakeable assurance that the future will resemble the past would, as Hume says, be based upon irrational faith in the indefinite continuation of miraculous coincidence (a faith that Hume ( 1902 , p. 43) termed ‘habit’).
There have been a number of critiques of the revival of causal powers realism, along the above lines (Backmann 2022 ; Beebee 2004 , 2011 ; Brown 2002 ; Mumford 2005 ; Footnote 5 Psillos 2017 ). It is fair to say that replies by causal powers realists have been slow to emerge, and without consensus. Footnote 6 Thus, this line of critique of causal powers realism would seem as effective now as when presented by Spinoza over three centuries ago, and by Hume a century later. Before turning to the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, a solution that emphasises the role of practical activity, it is instructive to briefly consider alternative philosophical approaches to mind that also highlight practical activity. As discussed by Di Paolo and Potapov ( 2024 ), the ‘phenomenological’ philosophies of Husserl, Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty emphasise practical activity and provide inspiration for work in (‘4E’) cognitive science that develops key Ilyenkovian insights. However, Di Paolo and Potapov ( 2024 ) rightly offer a note of philosophical caution in relating Ilyenkov and phenomenology. Phenomenological accounts of practical activity do not start with an unambiguous commitment to causal powers realism. For example, the Husserlian form of phenomenology is, contrary to causal powers realism, rooted in a commitment to Kantian transcendental idealism . By committing to causal powers realism and overcoming the problem of Humean scepticism to which causal powers realism gives rise, the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution develops a distinctively materialist account of practical activity and cognition, unfolded below. Footnote 7
Bakhurst ( 1991 , 2011 , pp. 91–122), has argued that Ilyenkov must be considered a ‘direct realist’. Within mainstream philosophy, direct realism attempts to overcome scepticism by arguing that we have direct, i.e., immediate, access to things themselves, without going through any perceptual intermediary that lacks direct connection to the world. Direct realism and the debate surrounding it have taken place on the terrain of mainstream Western philosophy, without yet being influenced by causal powers realism. I will use the notion of ‘direct realism’ in a simple and non-technical sense, to help explain the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution (not with any claim to contribute to the mainstream debate). The solution has two steps: first, to establish that the human mind is directly aware of the human body; second, and far more difficult, to establish that direct awareness of the human body enables direct awareness of the world outside of the human body.
Spinoza’s critique of sense experience is, on close scrutiny, also an argument for direct access of the human mind to the human body. It tells us that the human body is so constituted that spatial motions within it are expressed in the human mind as ideas. The flux of sense perception expresses motions within the body, albeit mistaken for objects outside of the body. From the perspective of causal powers realism, the view that ideas could be occurrent to the human mind even when there is no internal human bodily motion would be absurd because powers are explained as the workings (motions) of structures. A direct correlate of the flux of my ideas must be motion within my body. So, there is an anti-sceptical basis to the causal critique of sense perception in its account of direct self-awareness of the human body by the human mind. The human mind is, as Spinoza ( 2023 , Part 2, Prop. 8) puts it, the idea of the human body.
If we are capable of confused direct awareness of internal bodily motions, then this holds out the possibility that we are also capable of non-confused (adequate) direct awareness of internal bodily motions. However, what about motions outside of the human body? Given that the human mind is the idea of the human body then direct awareness of the world outside of the human body can arise in one circumstance and one circumstance only: if, and only if, the nature of the human body shares commonalities with the nature of external bodies . So, where in the nature of the human body can essential properties in common with external objects be found? How can any commonality of internal and external structures and motions be verified? And, even if some commonalities are affirmed, how can there be internal human bodily structures in common with all possible diverse structures of external objects that we may come across? These seemingly intractable questions are addressed in step 2.
Spinoza first addresses the questions developed above in his initial account of how humans achieve adequate knowledge through the faculty of reason: ‘Those things, which are common to all, and which are equally in a part and in the whole, cannot be conceived except adequately’ (Spinoza 2023 , Part 2, Proposition 38). Spinoza clarifies that the commonalities he is referring to include, for example, the property that all bodies are at motion or rest. Spinoza’s critique of sense perception does not apply to perception of shared properties like motion and rest since mistaking internal bodies for external bodies makes no difference to the ability to perceive the properties shared by both. In terms of our questions above, the human body shares in common with external bodies that it is in motion or rest so the human mind has direct and adequate self-awareness of this abstract property. However, what about the specific natures or structures of external objects? Proposition 39 hints at an answer: ‘That, which is common to and a property of the human body and such other bodies as are wont to affect the human body, and which is present equally in each part of either, or in the whole, will be represented by an adequate idea in the mind’ (Spinoza 2023 , Part 2, Proposition 39). Here, then, the human body can acquire specific commonalities with objects that are ‘wont’ to affect it, or, to draw from alternative translations, with external objects that humans ‘usually’ (Curley 1985 ) or ‘habitually’ (Kisner 2018 ) interact with. This is potentially a very important advance over Proposition 38 since it offers the possibility of direct and adequate awareness of the specific structures or natures of external bodies, via their being possessed in common with the human body. But what are these specific commonalities exactly, and how are they acquired through practical activity? Spinoza ( 2023 ) does not give any specific example. Nor does Spinoza explain exactly what is meant by reference to the ‘whole’ and the ‘part’ in this Proposition and in Proposition 38. As a result, the interpretation of these two propositions is an open question in the secondary literature (Hübner 2022 ). Ilyenkov’s ( 1977 , pp. 3–24) interpretation combines dialectics and causal powers realism, as follows.
If we consider sense perception in a static and analytical way, fixed structural part by fixed structural part, then, quite clearly, my specific cognitive and perceptual structures are essentially different from my glass of water and from external objects in general. Instead, we must consider cognition holistically and dynamically. The human mind must be aware not only, and not mainly, of the unique structural differences of the sense organs, the nervous system and so on, vital as these differences are. It must, instead, be aware primarily of the changing spatial relations of these bodily structures and parts, their relative motions. Thus, humans must be directly self-aware of the changing mutual spatial relations of their hands, fingers, legs, feet, eyes, head, and so on. The ever-expanding repertoire of structural variation, the ever-developing mode of human bodily activity, of the human body’s coordinated movement of its various parts taken together, must be tracked by the human cognitive system. Such a perspective reveals a radically different basis for cognition than direct self-awareness of the fixed respective structures of the sense organs. Humans have direct self-awareness of a structure that is not fixed , of the varying motion or trajectory of the human body.
In this light, Spinoza’s Propositions 38 and 39 can be understood. The knowledge of the properties of motion and rest common to all bodies (Proposition 38), is knowledge that can be acted on. Humans adapt their mode of activity to the external objects they directly encounter. To do so, they must be able to change their relevant internal bodily structures in light of reflection on their current and previous activity. Such adaptation enables the human body to act in ever greater accordance with external bodies (Proposition 39.) Awareness of the mode of bodily activity in direct contact and accordance with an external object is reasonably characterised as direct knowledge of that object. So, it is not a fixed and isolated structure or part of the human body that shares specific characteristics with external bodies in practical activity. Rather, it is the mode of human bodily activity, the coordinated shape or trajectory of human bodily activity taken as a whole, that comes into direct contact and accordance with specific external bodies enabling their use.
Ilyenkov ( 1977 , p. 21) gives a simple the example of how, in describing a circular object with my hands, the trajectory of my hands takes a form identical to the circular shape of the external object. Ilyenkov’s example is perhaps too simple, certainly in the eyes of critics, as we will see in the next section, below. So, let us return to our example of a glass of water. My knowledge of the glass of water is coterminous with my ability to use it. I have learnt a range of ways of acting with water: drinking it, boiling it, cleaning with it, using it to put out a fire, etc. Scientists have learnt a range of specific experimental activities with water, revealing its underlying structure, H 2 O, and explaining its powers. So, we have developed a wide-ranging and unique repertoire of activity with water through direct contact and accordance with it, revealing its structural essence and necessary powers. According to the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, our idea of water consists in our awareness of this direct access to, and accordance with, water, it does not consist in awareness of the play of light on the retina to which water happens to momentarily give rise.
It seems to me that all the above elements of Ilyenkov’s interpretation are amply present in the development of the text of Spinoza’s Ethics . Spinoza is very clear that the power of reason of the human mind is coterminous with the power of spatial activity of the human body, including its ability to arrange and use external objects to its own ends (Oittinen 2022a , p. 268; Spinoza 2023 , Part 2, Prop. 6). Furthermore, it is a central message of the Ethics as a whole that humans have the ability to modify their internal bodily structures to make their external mode of activity better accord with the true nature of the world. As Spinoza puts it ‘[s]o long as we are not assailed by emotions contrary to our nature, we have the power of arranging and associating the modifications of our body according to the intellectual order’, (Spinoza 2023 , Part 6, Prop. 10) where the ‘intellectual order’ is that of true knowledge of the world. Before clarifying and developing the solution further, and tackling misunderstandings, let us consider the huge advance the argument makes on causal powers realism.
The argument thus far reveals an underlying reason why the analysis of mind poses difficulties for causal powers realism. The Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution argues that the essential characteristic of the human body facilitating its mind and its thinking is not a fixed inner structure like H 2 O but one which continually changes , enabling adaptation to the external world. Continual structural change means that, unlike water, the mind has no fixed structural nature or definition. Mind is, in this sense, essentially non-spatial . Within contemporary causal powers realism, the key aspects of this difficulty are recognised. The self-changing power of humans is recognised (Sayer 2011 ; Ellis 2013 ) as is the infinite adaptability of thinking (McGinn 1991 ; Cooper 2008 ). As a result, very few causal powers realists argue that the mind (specifically, the faculty of reason) is, or could be, a natural kind (Bhaskar 1979 is an influential exception – see Brown 2002 ). However, this literature rarely attempts to answer the obvious question to which the non-spatial (in the sense defined) nature of mind gives rise. If mind has no essential structure, then what is its identity or nature, and how is it related to bodies in space? Footnote 9
To explain the power of thought in relation to the motions of bodies in space, we have to take a different strategy than for natural kinds such as water. To explain the latter, science needs to identify the underling structure of water, its structural constitution, and to comprehend how the workings of this structure (the motion of H 2 O molecules) interact with those of other objects (such as my metabolic system) to enable characteristic powers (such as quenching my thirst.) Such a strategy does not explain the power of thought. It is no good isolating the microstructural constitution of the human body and brain, like we do with H 2 O, for that will only tell us, if we are successful in our analysis, that human activity adapts to the external world. It will tell us that humans act, not according to their own internal bodily structures, but to those of external objects. Therefore, to explain thought, we must look beyond the inner structures of the human body and seek to comprehend the relation of human activity to external objects.
Clearly, over time, human activity develops to adapt to more and more external objects and arrangements of objects, without any fixed limit. So, we cannot limit our explanation to a consideration of human activity in relation to any one external object, or finite set of objects. Explanation of the power of thought is therefore a great deal more complex than explanation of the powers of water. It requires comprehension of the relation between human activity and nature as a real, interconnected or unified whole (a whole that Spinoza calls, ‘Real Infinite Nature’). Such an explanation can only be achieved in a step-by-step fashion, using a method appropriate to organic wholes or systems. For Ilyenkov, this is a ‘dialectical’ method, a method detailed in Ilyenkov ( 2008 ), and attributed to Spinoza by Ilyenkov (e.g., Harris 1995 , also attributes a dialectical method to Spinoza). Ilyenkov undertakes just such a step-by-step explanation in Dialectical Logic , retaining and going beyond the foundation provided by Spinoza, by encompassing Hegel, Marx and Engels. Before considering briefly these subsequent developments, we turn below to criticisms of the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution.
To clarify and develop the argument, whilst addressing criticisms such as found in the special issue to which I referred in the introduction of this paper, I will focus mainly on Maidansky’s important body of criticisms (e.g., 2022 , 2017 , 2007 ), which significantly overlap with those of Oittinen (e.g., 2005 , 2014 ). My aim is not a comprehensive reply but the beginning of a dialogue, trying to pick out fruitful lines for further debate, whilst clarifying my own argument. Though a strong advocate of Ilyenkov in general, Maidansky develops a hard-hitting and wide-ranging critique of Ilyenkov’s interpretation of Spinoza. Maidansky ( 2007 ) polemically presents his critique as an argument that Ilyenkov’s interpretation invents a ‘pseudo-Spinoza’, an inaccurate interpretation of the real Spinoza. This polemical construct succinctly expresses three of Maidansky’s key critical themes:
Ilyenkov’s pseudo-Spinoza predicates thought to a ‘thinking body’, when the true Spinoza predicates thought to mind, not body.
Pseudo-Spinoza’s ‘thinking body’ fails to distinguish the images of sense experience from the ideas of the intellect. As a result, what pseudo-Spinoza calls ‘adequate ideas’ are no different to sensual images of a kind that higher animals also possess.
Pseudo-Spinoza’s individualistic ‘thinking body’ has no material culture whereas Ilyenkov’s own developed philosophy stresses the vital importance of material culture, via what Ilyenkov terms ‘ideal forms’.
Maidansky (e.g., 2022 , p. 339) argues that Ilyenkov corrects his mistaken pseudo-Spinoza at the end of Ilyenkov’s chapter on Spinoza, by introducing the concept of ‘labour’. For Maidansky, Ilyenkov’s correction affirms that pseudo-Spinoza is an aberration that is best forgotten.
Let us take Maidansky’s criticisms in turn. It is true that the phrase ‘thinking body’ is used in Ilyenkov’s interpretation of Spinoza whereas, for Spinoza himself, bodies do not think. However, for Spinoza, there is a single thing that both thinks and extends. Humans think. Humans extend. Footnote 10 Therefore, it is easy to present the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution without the phrase ‘thinking body’. The phrase can be replaced either by the term ‘human’, or by the term ‘mind’, as best fits the context, to bring Ilyenkov’s terminology into line with that of Spinoza (I have followed this strategy in my exposition of the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, above). Ilyenkov’s use of the phrase ‘thinking body’ is therefore in itself only a nominal difference between Ilyenkov and Spinoza. Use of the phrase is fully in line with Ilyenkov’s stated aim:
to show the real problem that Spinoza’s thought came up against quite independently of how he himself realised it and in what terms he expressed it for himself and for others ( i.e. to set the problem out in the language of our century ), and then to trace what were the real principles ( once more independently of Spinoza’s own formulation of them ) on which he based the solution of the problem. (Ilyenkov 1977 , p. 9, emphasis added)
Why, then, do Maidansky and other critics argue that the difference between Spinoza and Ilyenkov is not nominal?
The crux of the issue, made very clear in Maidansky ( 2022 , pp. 336–340), is how Ilyenkov characterises adequate ideas. Ilyenkov does so through an interpretation of Spinoza’s account of ‘intuitive’ knowledge, (the interpretation of which is an open question in the secondary literature on Spinoza – see Hübner 2022 ) according to which: ‘In creating an adequate idea of itself, i.e. of the form of its own movement along the contours of external objects, the thinking body thus also created an adequate idea of the forms and contours of the objects themselves. Because it was one and the same form, one and the same contour ’ (Ilyenkov 1977 , p. 19). For me, in this passage, and several passages like it, we see how and why Ilyenkov ( 1977 ) shifts the basis of cognition away from the fixed structure of the sense organs towards the varying structure of the coordinated activity of the human body. I explained this radical shift in the basis for cognition in the previous section above. However, critics do not recognise in Ilyenkov’s text any such radical shift. Therefore, for Maidansky ( 2022 , pp. 336–340) an idea of a contour can only be a picture arising in sense perception (imagination). By no means could it be an adequate idea of an instance of the enduring causal structure or nature of the thing.
Maidansky’s (in my view) misunderstanding of Ilyenkov’s text is inadvertently encouraged by how Ilyenkov phrases his subsequent example. Footnote 11 Ilyenkov writes:
When I describe a circle with my hand on a piece of paper (in real space), my body, according to Spinoza, comes into a state fully identical with the form of the circle outside my body, into a state of real action in the form of a circle. My body (my hand) really describes a circle, and the awareness of this state (i.e. of the form of my own action in the form of the thing) is also the idea, which is, moreover, ‘adequate’. (Ilyenkov 1977 , p. 21)
There is a critical ambiguity in this passage. Reference to self-awareness of ‘a state of real action’ in the form of a circle (or indeed in the form of anything else) could be read as confirming Maidansky’s charge that Ilyenkov is referring to a momentary ‘state’ unrelated to the essential nature and enduring real powers of the thing. A better phrase than ‘state of real action’ appears no less than seventeen times in Ilyenkov’s short chapter on Spinoza, but unfortunately not in the quote we are discussing. I refer here to the phrase, ‘mode of activity’, together with the equivalent (in this context) phrase, ‘mode of action’. Footnote 12 The phrase avoids the critical ambiguity because a mode of activity (or of action) is not a static picture, it is a generative process. Self-awareness of the mode of bodily activity in the form of a circle implies knowledge of how a circle is generated in any suitable given context . Such self-awareness involves a concept or adequate idea – not a picture.
Clarity on the phrase ‘mode of activity’ can allay Maidansky’s concern that Ilyenkov’s interpretation of Spinoza fails to distinguish adequate ideas from those of animals. Consider a tethered horse trotting in a circle. The horse is passive in respect of the generation of the circle because it occurs via the constraint of the tether outside of the horse’s control. Therefore, even though a circle is generated through the constrained action of the tethered horse, the horse has no self-awareness of the mode of activity, no awareness of the general definition of a circle, of which its tethered trajectory is but one instance. In general, then, self-awareness of active generation requires knowledge of the relevant mode of activity. Without knowledge of this mode, the animal cannot know the essence of what is being generated and cannot actively generate it. Footnote 13 This is where the unique capacity of humans (or any alike things) lies. Footnote 14
Let us turn to Maidansky’s charge of individualism. Maidansky rightly stresses that, according to Ilyenkov’s developed philosophy, the world is not just full of powers and activities, but also of material culture. Ilyenkov stresses the importance of what he calls ‘ideal forms’ to material culture. These include signs, symbols, plans, plays, and so forth, the archetypal example of an ideal form being that of language. According to Ilyenkov’s ( 1977 , pp. 74–121) developed philosophy, then, ideal forms and material culture enable concepts to arise. Yet, as Maidansky points out, material culture would appear to be entirely absent from Ilyenkov’s account of ‘intuitive’ knowledge recounted above. This is a reason why Maidansky sees Ilyenkov’s discussion of intuitive knowledge as an individualistic aberration on Ilyenkov’s part.
Our clarification of the importance of the phrase ‘mode of activity’ can alleviate Maidansky’s concerns. Let us return to the example of a circle and seek to incorporate Ilyenkov’s notion of ideal forms. On Ilyenkov’s account, the word ‘circle’ is an ideal form that emerges as the social representation of the concept of a circle. The individual learns the meaning of the word ‘circle’, hence the concept of a circle, through undertaking the requisite mode of activity, i.e., by actively generating particular circles, under the regulation or facilitation ( whether through parenting, education, or everyday life ) of the social norms and practices that are associated with this mode of activity and its linguistic expression ( its ideal form ). Thus, by incorporating the role of ideal forms in enabling individuals to gain self-awareness of requisite modes of activity, we see that the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is sociocultural, not individualistic, when that solution is concretely developed.
Why, then, does the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, and the concept of intuitive knowledge, start at such an abstract level, without explicit reference to material culture? This high level of abstraction enables the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution to articulate how humans are palpably constrained by the objects of nature. The Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution thereby provides a materialist foundation for comprehending thought and nature, in fundamental contrast to Hegel’s absolute idealism and to Kant’s transcendental idealism. Establishing, at the most abstract level, a materialist foundation for philosophy, allows subsequent philosophical development to safely incorporate material culture without abandoning causal powers realist principles, so retaining the integral role of the structures and powers of the real, natural whole. To further understand the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, subsequent developments thereof, and to locate competing perspectives, we next turn to Ilyenkov’s development of the concept of ‘labour’, through which we can summarise the argument of the paper.
We started with a simple, intuitive, and materialist foundation: what a thing can do (its powers) depends upon what it is (its structure or nature.) This is a principle of causal powers realism. We then found that a preliminary causal analysis of sense perception leads to a philosophical problem: lack of direct access of the human mind to the real powers and structures of the world (a ‘veil of perception’) leading to Humean scepticism. Turning to the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, we explained that, in practical activity, humans achieve direct self-awareness of their mode of bodily activity in direct contact and accordance with the external object. Such self-awareness is rightly considered direct access to the external object. In response to misunderstandings, such as found in the special issue, we stressed that this is not awareness of a static ‘picture’ of a momentary state, formed in sense perception, but knowledge of the enduring essential structure of the external object, the structure that explains its characteristic causal powers.
We presented the argument as overcoming established difficulties in the contemporary literature on causal powers realism as regards (i) defining and explaining the mind and (ii) responding to the charge of Humean scepticism. Though not explicit in the narrative thus far, our exposition of the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution has also expressed and overcome the problem of Cartesian dualism (the main philosophical problem with which Spinoza himself was concerned – see Ilyenkov 1977 , Chap. 1). We have explained how mind, with no essential spatial definition, relates to, and accords with, the world of bodies in space. We explained that this occurs through the ability of humans to self-change their relevant inner spatial structures, enabling adaptation of their outward mode of bodily activity, to accord with external objects. This unlimited ability to adapt over time means that thought cannot be explained in relation to any one structure or object, nor to any finite set of structures or objects. Instead, thought must be explained, step-by-step, in terms of the developing relation between human activity and the unlimited diversity of external objects of nature as a whole – a step-by-step explanation that Ilyenkov unfolds in Dialectical Logic .
We must still consider the very end of Ilyenkov’s chapter on Spinoza, where Ilyenkov argues that Spinoza underplays how new structures are created by human activity. As Ilyenkov puts it, Spinoza’s conception of ‘substance’, or nature as a whole, is correct up to a point: ‘[b]ut that, Marx affirmed, is not enough. According to him, only nature of necessity thinks, nature that has achieved the stage of man socially producing his own life, … Labour is the process of changing nature by the action of social man, and is the ‘subject’ to which thought belongs as ‘predicate” (Ilyenkov 1977 , pp. 24–25). Ilyenkov’s development from Spinoza’s ‘substance’ to Marx’s ‘labour’ goes hand-in-hand with the introduction of ideal forms and material culture that we discussed at the end of the previous section, above. Maidansky is quite right to highlight this pivotal development. However, the development is not ( contra Maidansky) a rejection of Ilyenkov’s interpretation of Spinoza. The Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is retained and developed fundamentally in the move from substance to labour. That it is developed fundamentally is shown by the overemphasis in Spinoza’s philosophy on the mere adaptation by human activity to a given whole, underplaying the creative and productive power of labour. That it is retained is shown by the material constraints on labour. Labour does not break the laws of nature, it learns how to use them. Footnote 15
Thus, not only is the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution a materialist philosophical foundation for overcoming Humean scepticism and Cartesian dualism (which afflict mainstream philosophy to this day) it also demonstrates the importance of the dialectical method of ascent from abstract to concrete, championed by Ilyenkov ( 2008 ), and I would argue a vital aid to synthesis in scientific work of all kinds (Brown 2008 , 2014 ). The ever-deepening global reach of Ilyenkov’s philosophy serves as testimony to this multifaceted importance. Indeed, the need for the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution is becoming ever more urgent. For example, developments in artificial intelligence (AI) continue apace but, if the argument herein is correct, then neither mainstream philosophy, nor mainstream cognitive science, nor phenomenological philosophy, can comprehend the nature and limits of what is termed AI. The Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution, combining causal powers realism and dialectics, offers the requisite materialist basis for doing exactly that (see Ilyenkov forthcoming , and Chukhrov 2020 ). The comprehension of AI is but one of many exciting paths the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution opens for us to follow. If this paper helps to clarify the philosophical basis for taking any one of these paths it will have served its purpose.
Not to be confused with Roy Wood Sellar’s doctrine that is also called ‘critical realism’.
There have been parallel developments in the study of the history of philosophy with the rise of the interpretation of Hume as in some sense a ‘sceptical realist’, specifically a sceptical causal powers realist (see Stanford 1998 and Hakkarainen 2012 ). Also, recent Spinoza scholarship has begun to debate the nature of the connection between Spinoza and causal powers realism, calling for more research on this topic, a call heeded by this paper (Martin 2018 ; Viljanen 2008 ; Zylstra 2023 ).
With the partial exception of my own previous work (Brown 2002 and in Allen et al. 2013 ) which compares Ilyenkov’s philosophy specifically to ‘critical realism’ but not to causal powers realism more broadly.
The elements I pick out below include ‘essentialism’ (Koslicki and Raven 2024 ) and ‘emergentism’ (O’Connor 2021 ; Paoletti and Orilia 2017 ) which are often (but by no means always) included in causal powers realism. As Groff has explained, (e.g., Groff and Morgan 2023 ) there is subtlety and nuance across the causal powers realism literature that pertains even to its basics. My account in this section is adapted from Harré and Madden’s ( 1975 ) seminal contribution
Mumford ( 2005 ) argues specifically that any ‘essentialist’ element of causal powers realism does not overcome Humean scepticism – he therefore does not adopt essentialism within his powers ontology.
Backmann ( 2022 ) usefully surveys, and critiques, recent non-Humean responses (most responses defend Armstrong’s non-Humean philosophy, not causal powers realism). Mumford and Anjum ( 2011 , Chap. 3) make an interesting defence of causal powers realism, without obvious precedent.
Lassiter and Vukov ( 2022 ) set out a manifesto for incorporating causal powers realism within debates on the ‘extended mind’ (part of ‘4E’ cognition discussed by Di Paolo and Potapov 2024 ). They do so in a way that, in my view, shows the major potential benefits of building on the materialist philosophical foundations that the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution provides.
This subsection draws on Ilyenkov ( 1977 , pp. 16–19)
An exception to the general neglect of this question is Rom Harré and colleagues’ research programme on the ‘discursive mind’ (e.g., Harré and Gillett 1994 – see Kaidesoja 2007 ). Harré championed the revival of causal powers realism in both mainstream and non-mainstream philosophy (e.g., Harré and Madden 1975 ). Yet, he subsequently argued that the mind is not a causal power but a social construct of discourse or conversation. Harré’s account of mind draws heavily on Vygotsky but mistakenly omits the material and structural constraints on discourse (see Lewis 2001 ; Pratten 2009 , and Porpora 2018 ). These constraints are by contrast foregrounded by the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution as we will see below.
The unity of human mind and body is a finite manifestation of how, for Spinoza, thought and extension are different expressions of nature as a unified whole.
This example of a circle comes from Spinoza’s Tractatus de intellectus emendatione (see Oittinen 2005 ). Ilyenkov considers the example in light of his interpretation of Part 2, Propositions 38–9 of the Ethics discussed above. Bowring ( 2022 , p. 310) does not share the latter interpretation, so argues that the quoted passage is ‘not in Spinoza’ at all. I hope that by developing causal powers realism (in which Bowring, e.g., 2010 , and I share common heritage) this paper offers grounds for Bowring to reconsider.
The phrase ‘mode of activity’ is also closely related to the notion of a scheme of future action and, indeed, the word ‘scheme’ is used often (11 times) with this meaning in Ilyenkov’s chapter on Spinoza.
The definition of a circle in this example is what is termed a ‘genetic’ definition that explains how the shape is constructed, e.g., ‘a circle is a figure traced by a line that is fixed at one end’ (cf. Oittinen 2005 , p. 331). Note that, by fixing the length of the line, then this general definition becomes a definition of, and means to generate, a specific circle. Thus, the example invokes the relation between general and specific definitions or essences – a focal point of recent Spinoza literature (e.g., Soyarslan 2016 ) not reflected in Oittinen’s ( 2005 ) account of Spinoza and Ilyenkov.
Which is not to say that a horse is a mere automaton, with no thought at all, a view that was held by Descartes. It is to say that a horse does not achieve the fully developed conceptual thought of humans. Maidansky ( 2022 , pp. 337–38) seems to unjustly critique Ilyenkov for making the fair point that there is continuity as well as difference between animal and human thinking (Surmava and Simakin 2021 seem to make the opposite, and similarly unjust, critique – see f.n. 15, below). What I think Maidansky is trying to stress is the importance of material culture to fully developed thought – as outlined below.
As we have seen, for Maidansky ( 2022 , p. 339) the development is a ‘correction’ of an ‘error’ on Ilyenkov’s part. For Surmava and Simakin ( 2021 , slide 47), by contrast, the passage stating this development is an error, likely inserted by Ilyenkov to appease the censor. In my view, as expressed above, the development is neither a correction of an error nor an error inserted to appease the censor. It is a development from the abstract and simple Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution to a more concrete and complex solution. This is one of my few substantial disagreements with Surmava’s interpretation of the Spinoza-Ilyenkov solution.
Allen, David K., Andrew Brown, Stan Karanasios, and Alistair Norman. 2013. How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory. MIS Quarterly 37(3): 835–854. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43826003 .
Article Google Scholar
Backmann, M. 2022. Necessarily the Old Riddle Necessary Connections and the Problem of Induction Disputatio. Vol. XIV, No. 64.
Bakhurst, David 1991. Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy: From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Bakhurst, David. 2011. The formation of reason . Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Beebee, Helen. 2004. Review of brian ellis, scientific essentialism/the philosophy of nature. Mind 113: 334–340.
Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen. 2011. Necessary connections and the problem of induction. Noûs 45(3): 504–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00821.x .
Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A realist theory of science . London: Routledge.
Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences . London: Routledge.
Bowring, Bill. 2010. Dialectic and difference: Dialectical critical realism and the grounds of justice by Alan Norrie. Journal of Law and Society 37: 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00518.x .
Bowring, Bill. 2022. Spinoza, Marx and Ilyenkov (who did not know Marx’s transcription of spinoza). Studies in East European Thought 74(3): 297–317.
Brown, Andrew. 2002. Developing realistic philosophy: From critical realism to materialist dialectics. In Critical realism and Marxism , eds. Andrew Brown, Steve Fleetwood, and John Michael Roberts, 168–186. London: Routledge.
Brown, Andrew. 2008. A materialist development of some recent contributions to the labour theory of value. Cambridge Journal of Economics 32(1): 125–146.
Brown, Andrew. 2014. Critical realism in social research: Approach with caution. Work, Employment and Society 28(1): 112–123.
Bula, German. 2019. Passions, consciousness, and the Rosetta stone: Spinoza and embodied, extended, and affective cognition. Adaptive Behavior 27(1): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712318790739 .
Callinicos, Alex. 2023. Marx and Spinoza. International Socialism . 180: Autumn.
Chukhrov, Keti. 2020. The philosophical disability of reason: Evald Ilyenkov’s critique of machinic intelligence. Radical Philosophy 207: 67–78.
Cooper, Rachel. 2008. Are there natural kinds in psychology? In Revitalizing causality: Realism about causality in philosophy and social science , ed. Ruth Groff, 179–192. London: Routledge.
Curley, Edwin, ed. 1985. The collected works of spinoza , Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel A., and Kyrill Potapov. 2024. Evald Ilyenkov and the enactive approach. Studies in East European Thought https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09645-2 .
Ellis, Brian. 2013. The power of agency. In Powers and capacities in philosophy: The new aristotelianism , eds. Ruth Groff and John Greco, 186–206. London: Routledge.
Chapter Google Scholar
Evenden, Martin. 2012. Critical realism in the personal domain: Spinoza and explanatory critique of the emotions. Journal of Critical Realism 11(2): 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v11i2.163 .
Groff, Ruth, and John Greco. 2013. Powers and capacities in philosophy: The new Aristotelianism . London: Routledge.
Groff, Ruth P., and Jamie Morgan. 2023. Philosophy, metaphilosophy and ideology-critique: An interview with ruth porter groff. Journal of Critical Realism 22(2): 256–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2022.2101342 .
Hakkarainen, Jani. 2012. Hume’s scepticism and realism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(2): 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.664024 .
Harré, Rom, and Grant Gillett. 1994. The discursive mind . London: Sage Publications.
Harré, Rom, and Edward H. Madden. 1975. Causal powers . Oxford: Blackwell.
Harris, Errol E. 1995. The substance of spinoza . New Jersey: Humanities Press.
Hill, Benjamin, Henrik Lagerlund and Stathis Psillos (eds). 2021. Reconsidering causal powers: Historical and conceptual perspectives . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hübner, Karolina. 2022. Spinoza’s epistemology and philosophy of mind. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy , ed. Edward N. Zalta. Spring 2022 edition, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/spinoza-epistemology-mind/ .
Hume, David. 1902 [1777]. Enquiries concerning human understanding and concerning the principles of morals , ed. Lewis Amherst Selby-Bigge Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ilyenkov, Evald V. 1977 [1974]. Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory . Moscow: Progress.
Ilyenkov, Evald V. 2008 [1960]. The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s capital . Delhi: Aakar Books.
Ilyenkov, Evald V. forthcoming [1968]. On Idols and Ideals . Translated by Trevor Wilson. Historical Materialism .
Jacobs, Isabel. 2024. Evald Ilyenkov: 1924-1978. Filosofia: An Encyclopedia of Russian Thought . https://filosofia.dickinson.edu/encyclopedia/ilyenkov-evald/ .
Jacobs, Jonathan D., ed. 2017. Causal powers , Oxford: Oxford Academic Press.
Kaidesoja, Tuukka. 2007. Exploring the concept of causal power in a critical realist tradition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37(1): 63–87.
Kisner, Matthew J., ed. 2018. Spinoza: Ethics: Proved in geometrical order , New York: Cambridge University Press.
Knio, Karim. 2018. The morphogenetic approach and immanent causality: A spinozian perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48(4): 398–415.
Koslicki, Kathrin, and Michael J. Raven, eds. 2024. The Routledge handbook of essence in philosophy , London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008750 .
Lassiter, Charles, and Joseph Vukov. 2022. New ontological foundations for extended minds: Causal powers realism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09817-7 .
Lewis, Paul. 2001. Realism, causality and the problem of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30: 249–268.
Maidansky, Andrey. 2007. The Polemics on Res Cogitans , or How to Improve Spinoza’s Theory of Mind. Paper presented to the International Symposium of Philosophy Moscow, 15–16 November.
Maidansky, Andrey. 2017. The Ilyenkov triangle: Marxism in search of its philosophical roots. Stasis. 5(2): 136–163.
Maidansky, Andrey. 2022. Spinoza in late-Soviet philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 74: 333–344.
Martin, Christopher. 2018. Spinoza’s formal mechanism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99: 151–181.
McGinn, Colin. 1991. Mental states, natural kinds and psychophysical laws. In The problem of consciousness , 126–152. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mumford, Stephen. 2005. Kinds, essences, powers. Ratio. 18(4): 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00303.x .
Mumford, Stephen, and Rani Lill Anjum. 2011. Getting causes from powers . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Connor, Timothy. 2021. Emergent properties. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy , ed. Edward N. Zalta. Winter 2021 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/properties-emergent/ .
Oittinen, Vesa. 2005. Evald Il’enkov as an interpreter of Spinoza. Studies in East European Thought 57: 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-005-1408-0 .
Oittinen, Vesa. 2014. Evald Ilyenkov: The Soviet Spinozist. In Dialectic of the ideal: Evald Ilyenkov and creative Soviet Marxism , eds. Alex Levant and Vesa Oittinen, 107–122. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Oittinen, Vesa. 2022a. Soviet Spinoza: Introduction. Studies in East European Thought , 74(3): 267–277.
Oittinen, Vesa. 2022b. Vygotsky and Spinoza. Studies in East European Thought , 74(3): 359–381.
Paoletti, Michele P., and Francesco Orilia, eds. 2017. Philosophical and scientific perspectives on downward causation , New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638577 .
Porpora, Douglas V. 2018. Materialism, emergentism, and social structure: A response to wendt’s quantum mind. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48(2): 183–187.
Pratten, Stephen. 2009. Critical realism and causality: Tracing the Aristotelian legacy. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39: 189–218.
Psillos, Stathis. 2017. Induction and natural necessities. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 48: 327–340.
Sayer, Andrew. 2011. Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soyarslan, Sanem. 2016. The distinction between reason and intuitive knowledge in Spinoza’s ethics. European Journal of Philosophy 24(1): 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12052 .
Spinoza, Baruch. 2023 [1677]. Ethics , Delhi/Mumbai: Grapevine.
Stanford, Kyle. 1998. Reference and natural kind terms: the real essence of Locke’s view. Pacific philosophical quarterly 79(1): 78–97.
Surmava, Alexander. 2018. Spinoza in the science of object-oriented activity. Mind, Culture and Activity 25(4): 365–377.
Surmava, Alexander, and Alexander Simakin. 2021. The materialistic philosophy of practice . Draft available at. https://alexandersurmava.academia.edu/research#drafts .
Viljanen, Valtteri. 2008. Spinoza’s essentialist model of causation. Inquiry 51(4): 412–437.
Zylstra, Stephen. 2023. Spinoza, emanation, and formal causation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 61(4): 603–625.
Download references
I thank the anonymous referees, the issue editors, Andrey Maidansky, Steve Fleetwood and Jamie Morgan for very helpful comments on previous versions of this paper. Thanks to Andrey for support and discussion over the years, and thanks too to Alex and George Surmava for discussion and comments on previous related papers. I benefitted also from several conferences and seminars organised by International Friends of Ilyenkov – thank-you to the organisers and participants. All errors in the paper are my own.
Authors and affiliations.
Economics Department, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Andrew Brown
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Andrew Brown .
Competing interests.
No funds, grants, or other support was received. There is no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Brown, A. How ideas connect to the world. Stud East Eur Thought (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09674-x
Download citation
Accepted : 14 August 2024
Published : 23 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09674-x
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Format attachments.
You'll find several kinds of fields in your grant application forms - check boxes, dates, data entry fields, and attachments. This page provides guidance on attachments: documents that are prepared outside the grant application using whatever editing software you desire (e.g., Microsoft Word), converted to PDF format, and then added or uploaded to your application. We require PDF format to preserve document formatting and a consistent reading experience for reviewers and staff.
We have very specific attachment formatting requirements. Failure to follow these requirements may lead to application errors upon submission or withdrawal of your application from funding consideration.
A PDF that has fillable fields, electronic signatures, text boxes or images inserted, becomes layered with each of these elements representing a layer. The existence of these layers interferes with the handling of the documents in eRA systems. Consequently, PDF documents included in applications, progress reports, and other information collected in eRA Commons must be flattened. A flattened PDF is simply one in which all the layers are merged together into a single flat layer. Many simple PDFs are already flattened - all the information is contained in a single layer. Uploading a PDF that isn’t flattened may result in an eRA Commons error message. You will need to replace your PDF with a flattened version to complete the submission process.
Adherence to font size, type density, line spacing, and text color requirements is necessary to ensure readability and fairness. Although font requirements apply to all attachments, they are most important and most heavily scrutinized in attachments with page limits.
Text in your attachments must follow these minimum requirements:
Legibility is of paramount importance. Applications that include PDF attachments that do not conform to the minimum requirements listed above may be withdrawn from consideration.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Categories of Key Activities. Production: covers all actions related to product development, manufacturing, and delivery. It usually involves significant quantities of a product. This is the preponderant activity in the Business Models focused on manufacturing. Problem Solving: it is the core activity of organizations seeking unique solutions ...
We've also looked at emerging trends, showing how AI and big data are reshaping the landscape of problem-solving. Key takeaways: The importance of a structured problem-solving process; The power of combining analytical and creative techniques; The value of team-based approaches in complex problem-solving;
In this case, outsourcing will be the key activity of the company. Problem-Solving. This activity is characteristic of organizations that come up with exclusive solutions for certain problems, issues, situations, or challenges. Most often, these are companies providing different types of services. Hospitals, lawyers, financial and tax ...
7. Solution evaluation. 1. Problem identification. The first stage of any problem solving process is to identify the problem (s) you need to solve. This often looks like using group discussions and activities to help a group surface and effectively articulate the challenges they're facing and wish to resolve.
Problem-solving activities are specific actions or tasks that a business undertakes to identify and resolve issues that hinder value delivery to customers. These activities are essential for aligning a company's key operations with its value propositions, ensuring that the offerings meet customer needs and address pain points effectively. By focusing on problem-solving, businesses can innovate ...
Here are nine easy-to-implement activities that can bring substantial change to your team culture and overall workplace dynamics. #1. Crossword Puzzles. Objective: To enhance problem-solving skills, vocabulary, and cognitive abilities through engaging crossword puzzles. Estimated Time: 15-20 Minutes.
Car manufacturers, consumer electronics and drug companies are just a few examples of companies that rely on production as a key activity. 2. Problem Solving. Consultancies, hospitals, wellness clinics, spas and many other service companies typically aim to solve customer problems uniquely.
Video:- Shrinking Vessel. 2. Marshmallow Spaghetti Tower Training Activity: "Marshmallow Spaghetti Tower" is one of the creative, engaging and complex problem solving activities for adults where teams use spaghetti, tape, and string to build the tallest possible structure that can support a marshmallow on top.
Quick and easy problem-solving activities 12. Unpuzzled (in-person, virtual, hybrid) Activity Focus Areas: Communication, reasoning, collaboration under time pressure. Objective: Unpuzzled is an engaging team-building game that combines problem-solving and trivia elements. The goal is for each team to work collaboratively to solve a series of puzzles and then unscramble them to uncover a meta ...
Discuss lessons learned and the importance of problem solving skills. This is one of the problem solving activities for students that can create a simulated environmental crisis scenario, fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and problem solving skills in students. 5. Mathematical Escape Puzzle: Crack the Code.
2. Marshmallow Spaghetti Tower - The marshmallow team-building activities have the goal of building the tallest tower as quickly as possible. To make the task more challenging the marshmallow is placed at the top of the tower. This is a fun puzzle activity for team building. Benefit: Teambuilding puzzle.
2- Problem-solving. All businesses, no matter their business model, must approach problem-solving as a key activity. Problem-solving pathways are established so decision-making is as streamlined as possible. Proper problem-solving is an important element of maintaining customer relationships.
Production. Production management consists of a number of activities which are outlined below;. Selection of product and design: the first step is to select the right product and the right design for the product.This is a crucial decision because the combination of the right product (Value Proposition) and the right design (Key Activities)will dictate the success or the failure of the company.
For a supermarket (looking at the unit rather than the enterprise) restocking is a key activity. When customers go into the supermarket they expect to find goods on the shelves to buy. Without them, the business model falls apart. For a company like Google the key activities are improving its code base and then examine all the data that it has ...
14 types of problem-solving strategies. Here are some examples of problem-solving strategies you can practice using to see which works best for you in different situations: 1. Define the problem. Taking the time to define a potential challenge can help you identify certain elements to create a plan to resolve them.
Problem-solving is a critical skill and team building problem solving activities can help your team have fun while sharpening their skills. Phone 1-800-565-8735. Request a Quote. Virtual Team Building; In-person Team Building. ... Each challenge will lead them one step closer to finding the key and, ultimately, their escape.
3. Egg Drop. Helps with: Collaboration, decision-making. Why decision-making is important for problem-solving: Making decisions isn't easy, but indecision leads to team paralysis, stagnant thinking, and unsolved problems. Decision-making activities help your team practice making quick, effective choices.
Decision-making is essential to problem-solving because if the right decision is taken at the right time, it could resolve the problem, eventually benefiting the entire team and the organization. 5. Egg drop. Helps with: Decision Making & Collaboration. Estimated time: 10-15 Minutes.
The key activities in a business model canvas refer to the main things your business does to make money. This includes day-to-day work, marketing, production, solving issues, and office work. Your ...
Making decisions is a key part of the problem solving process. It's important to remember that decision making is not restricted to the leadership team. Every staff member makes decisions every day and developing these skills ensures that your team is able to solve problems at any scale. ... Check out our post on problem solving activities ...
5. Wild Goose Chase. The Wild Goose Chase is an exciting and interactive team-building activity that combines the thrill of a scavenger hunt with the power of problem-solving and teamwork. In this smartphone-based adventure, teams explore the city and complete challenges by taking photos and videos.
Problem solving and decision making team building activities foster engagement, improve communication and encourage cooperation and group interaction. ... Problem Solving and Decision Making Fun Ways to Turn Problems Into Opportunities. MTCT. Written by the Mind Tools Content Team
Give your team anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour for this activity. 6. Walking on a Plank. Create two teams with an equal number of members. You might need four 2×6 board for this problem-solving activity. Place two boards end to end and other two boards in parallel few feet away from the first two boards.
4. Sudoku. Sudoku is one of the most popular free problem solving games for adults. The objective of this game is to fill each box of a 9×9 grid so that every row, column, and letter contains each number from one to nine. The puzzle makes a great team challenge. To play Sudoku on Zoom, screen share the game board.
Problem-solving challenges. From tricky client requests to unexpected technical glitches, problem-solving is a must-have skill for any team. Enter problem-solving activities. ... The key is to find activities that are inclusive and engaging for your team, regardless of location or time zone. By taking the time to step away from work and connect ...
Below are some practical activities to implement that can foster creative problem-solving skills in students. Why Early Development of Creative Problem-Solving Skills Matters. Instilling creative problem-solving skills from a young age can have lasting benefits that extend well beyond the classroom. Here are some of the key advantages: 1.
The celebrated Russian philosopher, Evald Ilyenkov, draws on Spinoza to solve a key philosophical problem: how exactly does the mind connect to the real world? However, the proposed solution has come under much criticism, for example in a recent special issue of Studies of East European Thought (74, 3). This paper aims to clearly explain the solution, overcoming misunderstandings that are ...
You'll find several kinds of fields in your grant application forms - check boxes, dates, data entry fields, and attachments. This page provides guidance on attachments: documents that are prepared outside the grant application using whatever editing software you desire (e.g., Microsoft Word), converted to PDF format, and then added or uploaded to your application.