Identify
Explore
Discover
Discuss
Summarise
Describe
Last, format your objectives into a numbered list. This is because when you write your thesis or dissertation, you will at times need to make reference to a specific research objective; structuring your research objectives in a numbered list will provide a clear way of doing this.
To bring all this together, let’s compare the first research objective in the previous example with the above guidance:
Research Objective:
1. Develop finite element models using explicit dynamics to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion, initially using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum.
Checking Against Recommended Approach:
Q: Is it specific? A: Yes, it is clear what the student intends to do (produce a finite element model), why they intend to do it (mimic cup/shell blows) and their parameters have been well-defined ( using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum ).
Q: Is it measurable? A: Yes, it is clear that the research objective will be achieved once the finite element model is complete.
Q: Is it achievable? A: Yes, provided the student has access to a computer lab, modelling software and laboratory data.
Q: Is it relevant? A: Yes, mimicking impacts to a cup/shell is fundamental to the overall aim of understanding how they deform when impacted upon.
Q: Is it timebound? A: Yes, it is possible to create a limited-scope finite element model in a relatively short time, especially if you already have experience in modelling.
Q: Does it start with a verb? A: Yes, it starts with ‘develop’, which makes the intent of the objective immediately clear.
Q: Is it a numbered list? A: Yes, it is the first research objective in a list of eight.
1. making your research aim too broad.
Having a research aim too broad becomes very difficult to achieve. Normally, this occurs when a student develops their research aim before they have a good understanding of what they want to research. Remember that at the end of your project and during your viva defence , you will have to prove that you have achieved your research aims; if they are too broad, this will be an almost impossible task. In the early stages of your research project, your priority should be to narrow your study to a specific area. A good way to do this is to take the time to study existing literature, question their current approaches, findings and limitations, and consider whether there are any recurring gaps that could be investigated .
Note: Achieving a set of aims does not necessarily mean proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis, even if your research aim was to, but having done enough work to provide a useful and original insight into the principles that underlie your research aim.
Be realistic about what you can achieve in the time you have available. It is natural to want to set ambitious research objectives that require sophisticated data collection and analysis, but only completing this with six months before the end of your PhD registration period is not a worthwhile trade-off.
Each research objective should have its own purpose and distinct measurable outcome. To this effect, a common mistake is to form research objectives which have large amounts of overlap. This makes it difficult to determine when an objective is truly complete, and also presents challenges in estimating the duration of objectives when creating your project timeline. It also makes it difficult to structure your thesis into unique chapters, making it more challenging for you to write and for your audience to read.
Fortunately, this oversight can be easily avoided by using SMART objectives.
Hopefully, you now have a good idea of how to create an effective set of aims and objectives for your research project, whether it be a thesis, dissertation or research paper. While it may be tempting to dive directly into your research, spending time on getting your aims and objectives right will give your research clear direction. This won’t only reduce the likelihood of problems arising later down the line, but will also lead to a more thorough and coherent research project.
Finding a PhD has never been this easy – search for a PhD by keyword, location or academic area of interest.
Join thousands of students.
Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.
Everything you need to know to write a high-quality research question
By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | October 2023
If you’ve landed on this page, you’re probably asking yourself, “ What is a research question? ”. Well, you’ve come to the right place. In this post, we’ll explain what a research question is , how it’s differen t from a research aim, and how to craft a high-quality research question that sets you up for success.
What is a research question.
As the name suggests, the research question is the core question (or set of questions) that your study will (attempt to) answer .
In many ways, a research question is akin to a target in archery . Without a clear target, you won’t know where to concentrate your efforts and focus. Essentially, your research question acts as the guiding light throughout your project and informs every choice you make along the way.
Let’s look at some examples:
What impact does social media usage have on the mental health of teenagers in New York?
How does the introduction of a minimum wage affect employment levels in small businesses in outer London?
How does the portrayal of women in 19th-century American literature reflect the societal attitudes of the time?
What are the long-term effects of intermittent fasting on heart health in adults?
As you can see in these examples, research questions are clear, specific questions that can be feasibly answered within a study. These are important attributes and we’ll discuss each of them in more detail a little later . If you’d like to see more examples of research questions, you can find our RQ mega-list here .
At this point, you might be asking yourself, “ How is a research question different from a research aim? ”. Within any given study, the research aim and research question (or questions) are tightly intertwined , but they are separate things . Let’s unpack that a little.
A research aim is typically broader in nature and outlines what you hope to achieve with your research. It doesn’t ask a specific question but rather gives a summary of what you intend to explore.
The research question, on the other hand, is much more focused . It’s the specific query you’re setting out to answer. It narrows down the research aim into a detailed, researchable question that will guide your study’s methods and analysis.
Let’s look at an example:
Research Aim: To explore the effects of climate change on marine life in Southern Africa.
Research Question: How does ocean acidification caused by climate change affect the reproduction rates of coral reefs?
As you can see, the research aim gives you a general focus , while the research question details exactly what you want to find out.
Now that we’ve defined what a research question is, let’s look at the different types of research questions that you might come across. Broadly speaking, there are (at least) four different types of research questions – descriptive , comparative , relational , and explanatory .
Descriptive questions ask what is happening. In other words, they seek to describe a phenomena or situation . An example of a descriptive research question could be something like “What types of exercise do high-performing UK executives engage in?”. This would likely be a bit too basic to form an interesting study, but as you can see, the research question is just focused on the what – in other words, it just describes the situation.
Comparative research questions , on the other hand, look to understand the way in which two or more things differ , or how they’re similar. An example of a comparative research question might be something like “How do exercise preferences vary between middle-aged men across three American cities?”. As you can see, this question seeks to compare the differences (or similarities) in behaviour between different groups.
Next up, we’ve got exploratory research questions , which ask why or how is something happening. While the other types of questions we looked at focused on the what, exploratory research questions are interested in the why and how . As an example, an exploratory research question might ask something like “Why have bee populations declined in Germany over the last 5 years?”. As you can, this question is aimed squarely at the why, rather than the what.
Last but not least, we have relational research questions . As the name suggests, these types of research questions seek to explore the relationships between variables . Here, an example could be something like “What is the relationship between X and Y” or “Does A have an impact on B”. As you can see, these types of research questions are interested in understanding how constructs or variables are connected , and perhaps, whether one thing causes another.
Of course, depending on how fine-grained you want to get, you can argue that there are many more types of research questions , but these four categories give you a broad idea of the different flavours that exist out there. It’s also worth pointing out that a research question doesn’t need to fit perfectly into one category – in many cases, a research question might overlap into more than just one category and that’s okay.
The key takeaway here is that research questions can take many different forms , and it’s useful to understand the nature of your research question so that you can align your research methodology accordingly.
As we alluded earlier, a well-crafted research question needs to possess very specific attributes, including focus , clarity and feasibility . But that’s not all – a rock-solid research question also needs to be rooted and aligned . Let’s look at each of these.
A strong research question typically has a single focus. So, don’t try to cram multiple questions into one research question; rather split them up into separate questions (or even subquestions), each with their own specific focus. As a rule of thumb, narrow beats broad when it comes to research questions.
A good research question is clear and specific, not vague and broad. State clearly exactly what you want to find out so that any reader can quickly understand what you’re looking to achieve with your study. Along the same vein, try to avoid using bulky language and jargon – aim for clarity.
Unfortunately, even a super tantalising and thought-provoking research question has little value if you cannot feasibly answer it. So, think about the methodological implications of your research question while you’re crafting it. Most importantly, make sure that you know exactly what data you’ll need (primary or secondary) and how you’ll analyse that data.
A good research question (and a research topic, more broadly) should be rooted in a clear research gap and research problem . Without a well-defined research gap, you risk wasting your effort pursuing a question that’s already been adequately answered (and agreed upon) by the research community. A well-argued research gap lays at the heart of a valuable study, so make sure you have your gap clearly articulated and that your research question directly links to it.
As we mentioned earlier, your research aim and research question are (or at least, should be) tightly linked. So, make sure that your research question (or set of questions) aligns with your research aim . If not, you’ll need to revise one of the two to achieve this.
Research question faqs, how many research questions should i have, what should i avoid when writing a research question, can a research question be a statement.
Typically, a research question is phrased as a question, not a statement. A question clearly indicates what you’re setting out to discover.
Yes. A question that’s too broad makes your research unfocused, while a question that’s too narrow limits the scope of your study.
Here’s an example of a research question that’s too broad:
“Why is mental health important?”
Conversely, here’s an example of a research question that’s likely too narrow:
“What is the impact of sleep deprivation on the exam scores of 19-year-old males in London studying maths at The Open University?”
How do i know if my research question is good.
A good research question is focused, specific, practical, rooted in a research gap, and aligned with the research aim. If your question meets these criteria, it’s likely a strong question.
Not quite. A hypothesis is a testable statement that predicts an outcome, while a research question is a query that you’re trying to answer through your study. Naturally, there can be linkages between a study’s research questions and hypothesis, but they serve different functions.
The research question is a focused and specific query that your study aims to answer. It’s the central issue you’re investigating. The research objective, on the other hand, outlines the steps you’ll take to answer your research question. Research objectives are often more action-oriented and can be broken down into smaller tasks that guide your research process. In a sense, they’re something of a roadmap that helps you answer your research question.
If you’d like to see more examples of research questions, check out our research question mega list here . Alternatively, if you’d like 1-on-1 help developing a high-quality research question, consider our private coaching service .
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
Published on 30 October 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 12 December 2023.
A research question pinpoints exactly what you want to find out in your work. A good research question is essential to guide your research paper , dissertation , or thesis .
All research questions should be:
How to write a research question, what makes a strong research question, research questions quiz, frequently asked questions.
You can follow these steps to develop a strong research question:
The way you frame your question depends on what your research aims to achieve. The table below shows some examples of how you might formulate questions for different purposes.
Research question formulations | |
---|---|
Describing and exploring | |
Explaining and testing | |
Evaluating and acting |
Example research problem | Example research question(s) |
---|---|
Teachers at the school do not have the skills to recognize or properly guide gifted children in the classroom. | What practical techniques can teachers use to better identify and guide gifted children? |
Young people increasingly engage in the ‘gig economy’, rather than traditional full-time employment. However, it is unclear why they choose to do so. | What are the main factors influencing young people’s decisions to engage in the gig economy? |
Note that while most research questions can be answered with various types of research , the way you frame your question should help determine your choices.
Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them. The criteria below can help you evaluate the strength of your research question.
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Focused on a single topic | Your central research question should work together with your research problem to keep your work focused. If you have multiple questions, they should all clearly tie back to your central aim. |
Answerable using | Your question must be answerable using and/or , or by reading scholarly sources on the topic to develop your argument. If such data is impossible to access, you likely need to rethink your question. |
Not based on value judgements | Avoid subjective words like , , and . These do not give clear criteria for answering the question. |
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Answerable within practical constraints | Make sure you have enough time and resources to do all research required to answer your question. If it seems you will not be able to gain access to the data you need, consider narrowing down your question to be more specific. |
Uses specific, well-defined concepts | All the terms you use in the research question should have clear meanings. Avoid vague language, jargon, and too-broad ideas. |
Does not demand a conclusive solution, policy, or course of action | Research is about informing, not instructing. Even if your project is focused on a practical problem, it should aim to improve understanding rather than demand a ready-made solution. |
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Cannot be answered with or | Closed-ended, / questions are too simple to work as good research questions—they don’t provide enough scope for robust investigation and discussion. |
Cannot be answered with easily-found facts | If you can answer the question through a single Google search, book, or article, it is probably not complex enough. A good research question requires original data, synthesis of multiple sources, and original interpretation and argumentation prior to providing an answer. |
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Addresses a relevant problem | Your research question should be developed based on initial reading around your . It should focus on addressing a problem or gap in the existing knowledge in your field or discipline. |
Contributes to a timely social or academic debate | The question should aim to contribute to an existing and current debate in your field or in society at large. It should produce knowledge that future researchers or practitioners can later build on. |
Has not already been answered | You don’t have to ask something that nobody has ever thought of before, but your question should have some aspect of originality. For example, you can focus on a specific location, or explore a new angle. |
The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .
A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis – a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.
As you cannot possibly read every source related to your topic, it’s important to evaluate sources to assess their relevance. Use preliminary evaluation to determine whether a source is worth examining in more depth.
This involves:
An essay isn’t just a loose collection of facts and ideas. Instead, it should be centered on an overarching argument (summarised in your thesis statement ) that every part of the essay relates to.
The way you structure your essay is crucial to presenting your argument coherently. A well-structured essay helps your reader follow the logic of your ideas and understand your overall point.
A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).
A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, December 12). Writing Strong Research Questions | Criteria & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 9 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/the-research-process/research-question/
Other students also liked, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, how to write a results section | tips & examples, what is a research methodology | steps & tips.
The first step in any research project is framing the research question. It can be considered the core of any systematic investigation as the research outcomes are tied to asking the right questions. Thus, this primary interrogation point sets the pace for your research as it helps collect relevant and insightful information that ultimately influences your work.
Typically, the research question guides the stages of inquiry, analysis, and reporting. Depending on the use of quantifiable or quantitative data, research questions are broadly categorized into quantitative or qualitative research questions. Both types of research questions can be used independently or together, considering the overall focus and objectives of your research.
A research question is a clear, focused, concise, and arguable question on which your research and writing are centered. 1 It states various aspects of the study, including the population and variables to be studied and the problem the study addresses. These questions also set the boundaries of the study, ensuring cohesion.
Designing the research question is a dynamic process where the researcher can change or refine the research question as they review related literature and develop a framework for the study. Depending on the scale of your research, the study can include single or multiple research questions.
A good research question has the following features:
A poorly formulated research question poses several risks. 1
Now that you know “What is a research question?”, let’s look at the different types of research questions.
Depending on the type of research to be done, research questions can be classified broadly into quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods studies. Knowing the type of research helps determine the best type of research question that reflects the direction and epistemological underpinnings of your research.
The structure and wording of quantitative 2 and qualitative research 3 questions differ significantly. The quantitative study looks at causal relationships, whereas the qualitative study aims at exploring a phenomenon.
Quantitative research questions can be further categorized into descriptive, comparative, and relationship, as explained in the Table below.
Descriptive research questions | These measure the responses of a study’s population toward a particular question or variable. Common descriptive research questions will begin with “How much?”, “How regularly?”, “What percentage?”, “What time?”, “What is?” Research question example: How often do you buy mobile apps for learning purposes? |
Comparative research questions | These investigate differences between two or more groups for an outcome variable. For instance, the researcher may compare groups with and without a certain variable. Research question example: What are the differences in attitudes towards online learning between visual and Kinaesthetic learners? |
Relationship research questions | These explore and define trends and interactions between two or more variables. These investigate relationships between dependent and independent variables and use words such as “association” or “trends. Research question example: What is the relationship between disposable income and job satisfaction amongst US residents? |
Qualitative research questions are adaptable, non-directional, and more flexible. It concerns broad areas of research or more specific areas of study to discover, explain, or explore a phenomenon. These are further classified as follows:
Exploratory Questions | These question looks to understand something without influencing the results. The aim is to learn more about a topic without attributing bias or preconceived notions. Research question example: What are people’s thoughts on the new government? |
Experiential questions | These questions focus on understanding individuals’ experiences, perspectives, and subjective meanings related to a particular phenomenon. They aim to capture personal experiences and emotions. Research question example: What are the challenges students face during their transition from school to college? |
Interpretive Questions | These questions investigate people in their natural settings to help understand how a group makes sense of shared experiences of a phenomenon. Research question example: How do you feel about ChatGPT assisting student learning? |
Mixed-methods studies use both quantitative and qualitative research questions to answer your research question. Mixed methods provide a complete picture than standalone quantitative or qualitative research, as it integrates the benefits of both methods. Mixed methods research is often used in multidisciplinary settings and complex situational or societal research, especially in the behavioral, health, and social science fields.
A good research question should be clear and focused to guide your research. It should synthesize multiple sources to present your unique argument, and should ideally be something that you are interested in. But avoid questions that can be answered in a few factual statements. The following are the main attributes of a good research question.
The importance of research questions cannot be understated. When drafting a research question, use the following frameworks to guide the components of your question to ease the process. 4
Those struggling to understand how to write a research question, these simple steps can help you simplify the process of writing a research question.
Topic selection | Choose a broad topic, such as “learner support” or “social media influence” for your study. Select topics of interest to make research more enjoyable and stay motivated. |
Preliminary research | The goal is to refine and focus your research question. The following strategies can help: Skim various scholarly articles. List subtopics under the main topic. List possible research questions for each subtopic. Consider the scope of research for each of the research questions. Select research questions that are answerable within a specific time and with available resources. If the scope is too large, repeat looking for sub-subtopics. |
Audience | When choosing what to base your research on, consider your readers. For college papers, the audience is academic. Ask yourself if your audience may be interested in the topic you are thinking about pursuing. Determining your audience can also help refine the importance of your research question and focus on items related to your defined group. |
Generate potential questions | Ask open-ended “how?” and “why?” questions to find a more specific research question. Gap-spotting to identify research limitations, problematization to challenge assumptions made by others, or using personal experiences to draw on issues in your industry can be used to generate questions. |
Review brainstormed questions | Evaluate each question to check their effectiveness. Use the FINER model to see if the question meets all the research question criteria. |
Construct the research question | Multiple frameworks, such as PICOT and PEA, are available to help structure your research question. The frameworks listed below can help you with the necessary information for generating your research question. |
Framework | Attributes of each framework |
FINER | Feasible Interesting Novel Ethical Relevant |
PICOT | Population or problem Intervention or indicator being studied Comparison group Outcome of interest Time frame of the study |
PEO | Population being studied Exposure to preexisting conditions Outcome of interest |
The following are some bad and good research question examples
Unclear: How does social media affect student growth? |
Clear: What effect does the daily use of Twitter and Facebook have on the career development goals of students? |
Explanation: The first research question is unclear because of the vagueness of “social media” as a concept and the lack of specificity. The second question is specific and focused, and its answer can be discovered through data collection and analysis. |
Simple: Has there been an increase in the number of gifted children identified? |
Complex: What practical techniques can teachers use to identify and guide gifted children better? |
Explanation: A simple “yes” or “no” statement easily answers the first research question. The second research question is more complicated and requires the researcher to collect data, perform in-depth data analysis, and form an argument that leads to further discussion. |
References:
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
Language and grammar rules for academic writing, you may also like, how to cite in apa format (7th edition):..., how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, academic editing: how to self-edit academic text with..., measuring academic success: definition & strategies for excellence.
Instant insights, infinite possibilities
Last updated
Reviewed by
Tanya Williams
However, developing a good research question is often challenging. But, doing appropriate data analysis or drawing meaningful conclusions from your investigation with a well-defined question make it easier.
So, to get you on the right track, let’s start by defining a research question, what types of research questions are common, and the steps to drafting an excellent research question.
Dovetail streamlines research to help you uncover and share actionable insights
The definition of a research question might seem fairly obvious.
At its simplest, a research question is a question you research to find the answer.
Researchers typically start with a problem or an issue and seek to understand why it has occurred, how it can be solved, or other aspects of its nature.
As you'll see, researchers typically start with a broad question that becomes narrower and more specific as the research stages are completed.
In some cases, a study may tackle more than one research question.
Research questions are typically divided into three broad categories: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method.
These categories reflect the research type necessary to answer the research question.
When you conduct qualitative research, you're broadly exploring a subject to analyze its inherent qualities.
There are many types of qualitative research questions, which include:
Descriptive: describing and illuminating little-known or overlooked aspects of a subject
Emancipatory: uncovering data that can serve to emancipate a particular group of people, such as disadvantaged or marginalized communities
Evaluative: assessing how well a particular research approach or method works
Explanatory: answering “how” or “why” a given phenomenon occurs
Exploratory: identifying reasons behind certain behaviors and exploring motivations (also known as generative research because it can generate solutions to problems)
Ideological: researching ideologies or beliefs, such as political affiliation
Interpretive: understanding group perceptions, decision-making, and behavior in a natural setting
Predictive: forecasting a likely outcome or scenario by examining past events
While it's helpful to understand the differences between these qualitative research question types, writing a good question doesn't start with determining the precise type of research question you'll be asking.
It starts with determining what answers you're seeking.
Unlike broad, flexible qualitative research questions, quantitative research questions are precise. They also directly link the research question and the proposed methodology.
So, in a quantitative research question, you'll usually find
The study method
An independent variable (or variables)
A dependent variable
The study population
Quantitative research questions can also fall into multiple categories, including:
Comparative research questions compare two or more groups according to specific criteria and analyze their similarities and differences.
Descriptive questions measure a population's response to one or more variables.
Relationship (or relationship-based) questions examine how two or more variables interact.
As its name suggests, mixed-methods research questions involve qualitative and quantitative components.
These questions are ideal when the answers require an evaluation of a specific aspect of a phenomenon that you can quantify and a broader understanding of aspects that can't.
Writing a good research question can be challenging, even if you're passionate about the subject matter.
A good research question aims to solve a problem that still needs to be answered and can be solved empirically.
The approach might involve quantitative or qualitative methodology, or a mixture of both. To write a well-developed research question, follow the four steps below:
Start with a broad topic. You may already have one in mind or get one assigned to you. If you don't, think about one you're curious about.
You can also use common brainstorming techniques , draw on discussions you've had with family and friends, take topics from the news, or use other similar sources of inspiration.
Also, consider a subject that has yet to be studied or addressed. If you're looking to tackle a topic that has already been thoroughly studied, you'll want to examine it from a new angle.
Still, the closer your question, approach, and outcomes are to existing literature, the less value your work will offer. It will also be less publishing-worthy (if that’s your goal).
Next, you'll want to conduct some initial research about your topic. You'll read coverage about your topic in academic journals, the news, and other credible sources at this stage.
You'll familiarize yourself with the terminology commonly used to describe your topic and the current take from subject matter experts and the general public.
This preliminary review helps you in a few ways. First, you'll find many researchers will discuss challenges they found conducting their research in their "Limitations," "Results," and "Discussion" sections of research papers.
Assessing these sections also helps you avoid choosing the wrong methodological approach to answering your question. Initial research also enables you to avoid focusing on a topic that has already been covered.
You can generate valuable research questions by tracking topics that have yet to be covered.
Next, you'll want to give some thought to your audience. For example, what kinds of research material are they looking for, and what might they find valuable?
Reflect on why you’re conducting the research.
What is your team looking to learn if your research is for a work assignment?
How does what they’re asking for from you connect to business goals?
Understanding what your audience is seeking can help you shape the direction of your research so that the final draft connects with your audience.
If you're writing for an academic journal, what types of research do they publish? What kinds of research approaches have they published? And what criteria do they expect submitted manuscripts to meet?
Take the insights you've gained from your preliminary research and your audience assessment to narrow your topic into a research question.
Your question should be one that you can answer using the appropriate research methods. Unfortunately, some researchers start with questions they need more resources to answer and then produce studies whose outcomes are limited, limiting the study's value to the broader community.
Make sure your question is one you can realistically answer.
"How do electronics distract teen drivers?"
This question could be better from a researcher's perspective because it is overly broad. For instance, what is “electronics” in this context? Some electronics, like eye-monitoring systems in semi-autonomous vehicles, are designed to keep drivers focused on the road.
Also, how does the question define “teens”? Some states allow you to get a learner's permit as young as 14, while others require you to be 18 to drive. Therefore, conducting a study without further defining the participants' ages is not scientifically sound.
Here's another example of an ineffective research question:
"Why is the sky blue?"
This question has been researched thoroughly and answered.
A simple online search will turn up hundreds, if not thousands, of pages of resources devoted to this very topic.
Suppose you spend time conducting original research on a long-answered question; your research won’t be interesting, relevant, or valuable to your audience.
Alternatively, here's an example of a good research question:
"How does using a vehicle’s infotainment touch screen by drivers aged 16 to 18 in the U.S. affect driving habits?"
This question is far more specific than the first bad example. It notes the population of the study, as well as the independent and dependent variables.
And if you're still interested in the sky's color, a better example of a research question might be:
"What color is the sky on Proxima Centauri b, based on existing observations?"
A qualitative research study based on this question could extrapolate what visitors on Proxima Centauri b (a planet in the closest solar system to ours) might see as they look at the sky.
You could approach this by contextualizing our understanding of how the light scatters off the molecules of air resulting in a blue sky, and the likely composition of Proxima Centauri b's atmosphere from data NASA and others have gathered.
As you can see from the examples, starting with a poorly-framed research question can make your study difficult or impossible to complete.
Or it can lead you to duplicate research findings.
Ultimately, developing the right research question sets you up for success. It helps you define a realistic scope for your study, informs the best approach to answer the central question, and conveys its value to your audience.
That's why you must take the time to get your research question right before you embark on any other part of your project.
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 22 August 2024
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 August 2024
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 30 April 2024
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.
Get started for free
Formulating research aim and objectives in an appropriate manner is one of the most important aspects of your thesis. This is because research aim and objectives determine the scope, depth and the overall direction of the research. Research question is the central question of the study that has to be answered on the basis of research findings.
Research aim emphasizes what needs to be achieved within the scope of the research, by the end of the research process. Achievement of research aim provides answer to the research question.
Research objectives divide research aim into several parts and address each part separately. Research aim specifies WHAT needs to be studied and research objectives comprise a number of steps that address HOW research aim will be achieved.
As a rule of dumb, there would be one research aim and several research objectives. Achievement of each research objective will lead to the achievement of the research aim.
Consider the following as an example:
Research title: Effects of organizational culture on business profitability: a case study of Virgin Atlantic
Research aim: To assess the effects of Virgin Atlantic organizational culture on business profitability
Following research objectives would facilitate the achievement of this aim:
Figure below illustrates additional examples in formulating research aims and objectives:
Formulation of research question, aim and objectives
Common mistakes in the formulation of research aim relate to the following:
1. Choosing the topic too broadly . This is the most common mistake. For example, a research title of “an analysis of leadership practices” can be classified as too broad because the title fails to answer the following questions:
a) Which aspects of leadership practices? Leadership has many aspects such as employee motivation, ethical behaviour, strategic planning, change management etc. An attempt to cover all of these aspects of organizational leadership within a single research will result in an unfocused and poor work.
b) An analysis of leadership practices in which country? Leadership practices tend to be different in various countries due to cross-cultural differences, legislations and a range of other region-specific factors. Therefore, a study of leadership practices needs to be country-specific.
c) Analysis of leadership practices in which company or industry? Similar to the point above, analysis of leadership practices needs to take into account industry-specific and/or company-specific differences, and there is no way to conduct a leadership research that relates to all industries and organizations in an equal manner.
Accordingly, as an example “a study into the impacts of ethical behaviour of a leader on the level of employee motivation in US healthcare sector” would be a more appropriate title than simply “An analysis of leadership practices”.
2. Setting an unrealistic aim . Formulation of a research aim that involves in-depth interviews with Apple strategic level management by an undergraduate level student can be specified as a bit over-ambitious. This is because securing an interview with Apple CEO Tim Cook or members of Apple Board of Directors might not be easy. This is an extreme example of course, but you got the idea. Instead, you may aim to interview the manager of your local Apple store and adopt a more feasible strategy to get your dissertation completed.
3. Choosing research methods incompatible with the timeframe available . Conducting interviews with 20 sample group members and collecting primary data through 2 focus groups when only three months left until submission of your dissertation can be very difficult, if not impossible. Accordingly, timeframe available need to be taken into account when formulating research aims and objectives and selecting research methods.
Moreover, research objectives need to be formulated according to SMART principle,
where the abbreviation stands for specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound.
Study employee motivation of Coca-Cola | To study the impacts of management practices on the levels of employee motivation at Coca-Cola US by December 5, 2022
|
Analyze consumer behaviour in catering industry
| Analyzing changes in consumer behaviour in catering industry in the 21 century in the UK by March 1, 2022 |
Recommend Toyota Motor Corporation management on new market entry strategy
| Formulating recommendations to Toyota Motor Corporation management on the choice of appropriate strategy to enter Vietnam market by June 9, 2022
|
Analyze the impact of social media marketing on business
| Assessing impacts of integration of social media into marketing strategy on the level of brand awareness by March 30, 2022
|
Finding out about time management principles used by Accenture managers | Identifying main time-management strategies used by managers of Accenture France by December 1, 2022 |
Examples of SMART research objectives
At the conclusion part of your research project you will need to reflect on the level of achievement of research aims and objectives. In case your research aims and objectives are not fully achieved by the end of the study, you will need to discuss the reasons. These may include initial inappropriate formulation of research aims and objectives, effects of other variables that were not considered at the beginning of the research or changes in some circumstances during the research process.
John Dudovskiy
Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey
Table of Contents
Research is at the center of everything researchers do, and setting clear, well-defined research objectives plays a pivotal role in guiding scholars toward their desired outcomes. Research papers are essential instruments for researchers to effectively communicate their work. Among the many sections that constitute a research paper, the introduction plays a key role in providing a background and setting the context. 1 Research objectives, which define the aims of the study, are usually stated in the introduction. Every study has a research question that the authors are trying to answer, and the objective is an active statement about how the study will answer this research question. These objectives help guide the development and design of the study and steer the research in the appropriate direction; if this is not clearly defined, a project can fail!
Research studies have a research question, research hypothesis, and one or more research objectives. A research question is what a study aims to answer, and a research hypothesis is a predictive statement about the relationship between two or more variables, which the study sets out to prove or disprove. Objectives are specific, measurable goals that the study aims to achieve. The difference between these three is illustrated by the following example:
This article discusses the importance of clear, well-thought out objectives and suggests methods to write them clearly.
Research objectives are usually included in the introduction section. This section is the first that the readers will read so it is essential that it conveys the subject matter appropriately and is well written to create a good first impression. A good introduction sets the tone of the paper and clearly outlines the contents so that the readers get a quick snapshot of what to expect.
A good introduction should aim to: 2,3
Objectives can help you stay focused and steer your research in the required direction. They help define and limit the scope of your research, which is important to efficiently manage your resources and time. The objectives help to create and maintain the overall structure, and specify two main things—the variables and the methods of quantifying the variables.
A good research objective:
Research objectives can be broadly classified into general and specific objectives . 4 General objectives state what the research expects to achieve overall while specific objectives break this down into smaller, logically connected parts, each of which addresses various parts of the research problem. General objectives are the main goals of the study and are usually fewer in number while specific objectives are more in number because they address several aspects of the research problem.
Example (general objective): To investigate the factors influencing the financial performance of firms listed in the New York Stock Exchange market.
Example (specific objective): To assess the influence of firm size on the financial performance of firms listed in the New York Stock Exchange market.
In addition to this broad classification, research objectives can be grouped into several categories depending on the research problem, as given in Table 1.
Table 1: Types of research objectives
Exploratory | Explores a previously unstudied topic, issue, or phenomenon; aims to generate ideas or hypotheses |
Descriptive | Describes the characteristics and features of a particular population or group |
Explanatory | Explains the relationships between variables; seeks to identify cause-and-effect relationships |
Predictive | Predicts future outcomes or events based on existing data samples or trends |
Diagnostic | Identifies factors contributing to a particular problem |
Comparative | Compares two or more groups or phenomena to identify similarities and differences |
Historical | Examines past events and trends to understand their significance and impact |
Methodological | Develops and improves research methods and techniques |
Theoretical | Tests and refines existing theories or helps develop new theoretical perspectives |
Research objectives must start with the word “To” because this helps readers identify the objective in the absence of headings and appropriate sectioning in research papers. 5,6
Research objectives can be written using the following steps: 7
Formulating research objectives has the following five steps, which could help researchers develop a clear objective: 8
Adding clear research objectives has the following advantages: 4,8
Research objectives also have few disadvantages, as listed below: 8
Q: what’s the difference between research objectives and aims 9.
A: Research aims are statements that reflect the broad goal(s) of the study and outline the general direction of the research. They are not specific but clearly define the focus of the study.
Example: This research aims to explore employee experiences of digital transformation in retail HR.
Research objectives focus on the action to be taken to achieve the aims. They make the aims more practical and should be specific and actionable.
Example: To observe the retail HR employees throughout the digital transformation.
A: Here are a few examples of research objectives:
A: Developing research objectives begins with defining the problem statement clearly, as illustrated by Figure 1. Objectives specify how the research question will be answered and they determine what is to be measured to test the hypothesis.
A: The word “measurable” implies that something is quantifiable. In terms of research objectives, this means that the source and method of collecting data are identified and that all these aspects are feasible for the research. Some metrics can be created to measure your progress toward achieving your objectives.
A: Revising research objectives during the study is acceptable in situations when the selected methodology is not progressing toward achieving the objective, or if there are challenges pertaining to resources, etc. One thing to keep in mind is the time and resources you would have to complete your research after revising the objectives. Thus, as long as your problem statement and hypotheses are unchanged, minor revisions to the research objectives are acceptable.
Broad statement; guide the overall direction of the research | Specific, measurable goals that the research aims to achieve |
Identify the main problem | Define the specific outcomes the study aims to achieve |
Used to generate hypotheses or identify gaps in existing knowledge | Used to establish clear and achievable targets for the research |
Not mutually exclusive with research objectives | Should be directly related to the research question |
Example: | Example: |
A: No, hypotheses are predictive theories that are expressed in general terms. Research objectives, which are more specific, are developed from hypotheses and aim to test them. A hypothesis can be tested using several methods and each method will have different objectives because the methodology to be used could be different. A hypothesis is developed based on observation and reasoning; it is a calculated prediction about why a particular phenomenon is occurring. To test this prediction, different research objectives are formulated. Here’s a simple example of both a research hypothesis and research objective.
Research hypothesis : Employees who arrive at work earlier are more productive.
Research objective : To assess whether employees who arrive at work earlier are more productive.
To summarize, research objectives are an important part of research studies and should be written clearly to effectively communicate your research. We hope this article has given you a brief insight into the importance of using clearly defined research objectives and how to formulate them.
R Discovery is a literature search and research reading platform that accelerates your research discovery journey by keeping you updated on the latest, most relevant scholarly content. With 250M+ research articles sourced from trusted aggregators like CrossRef, Unpaywall, PubMed, PubMed Central, Open Alex and top publishing houses like Springer Nature, JAMA, IOP, Taylor & Francis, NEJM, BMJ, Karger, SAGE, Emerald Publishing and more, R Discovery puts a world of research at your fingertips.
Try R Discovery Prime FREE for 1 week or upgrade at just US$72 a year to access premium features that let you listen to research on the go, read in your language, collaborate with peers, auto sync with reference managers, and much more. Choose a simpler, smarter way to find and read research – Download the app and start your free 7-day trial today !
Research questions lie at the core of systematic investigation and this is because recording accurate research outcomes is tied to asking the right questions. Asking the right questions when conducting research can help you collect relevant and insightful information that ultimately influences your work, positively.
The right research questions are typically easy to understand, straight to the point, and engaging. In this article, we will share tips on how to create the right research questions and also show you how to create and administer an online questionnaire with Formplus .
A research question is a specific inquiry which the research seeks to provide a response to. It resides at the core of systematic investigation and it helps you to clearly define a path for the research process.
A research question is usually the first step in any research project. Basically, it is the primary interrogation point of your research and it sets the pace for your work.
Typically, a research question focuses on the research, determines the methodology and hypothesis, and guides all stages of inquiry, analysis, and reporting. With the right research questions, you will be able to gather useful information for your investigation.
Research questions are broadly categorized into 2; that is, qualitative research questions and quantitative research questions. Qualitative and quantitative research questions can be used independently and co-dependently in line with the overall focus and objectives of your research.
If your research aims at collecting quantifiable data , you will need to make use of quantitative research questions. On the other hand, qualitative questions help you to gather qualitative data bothering on the perceptions and observations of your research subjects.
A qualitative research question is a type of systematic inquiry that aims at collecting qualitative data from research subjects. The aim of qualitative research questions is to gather non-statistical information pertaining to the experiences, observations, and perceptions of the research subjects in line with the objectives of the investigation.
As the name clearly suggests, ethnographic research questions are inquiries presented in ethnographic research. Ethnographic research is a qualitative research approach that involves observing variables in their natural environments or habitats in order to arrive at objective research outcomes.
These research questions help the researcher to gather insights into the habits, dispositions, perceptions, and behaviors of research subjects as they interact in specific environments.
Ethnographic research questions can be used in education, business, medicine, and other fields of study, and they are very useful in contexts aimed at collecting in-depth and specific information that are peculiar to research variables. For instance, asking educational ethnographic research questions can help you understand how pedagogy affects classroom relations and behaviors.
This type of research question can be administered physically through one-on-one interviews, naturalism (live and work), and participant observation methods. Alternatively, the researcher can ask ethnographic research questions via online surveys and questionnaires created with Formplus.
Examples of Ethnographic Research Questions
A case study is a qualitative research approach that involves carrying out a detailed investigation into a research subject(s) or variable(s). In the course of a case study, the researcher gathers a range of data from multiple sources of information via different data collection methods, and over a period of time.
The aim of a case study is to analyze specific issues within definite contexts and arrive at detailed research subject analyses by asking the right questions. This research method can be explanatory, descriptive , or exploratory depending on the focus of your systematic investigation or research.
An explanatory case study is one that seeks to gather information on the causes of real-life occurrences. This type of case study uses “how” and “why” questions in order to gather valid information about the causative factors of an event.
Descriptive case studies are typically used in business researches, and they aim at analyzing the impact of changing market dynamics on businesses. On the other hand, exploratory case studies aim at providing answers to “who” and “what” questions using data collection tools like interviews and questionnaires.
Some questions you can include in your case studies are:
An interview is a qualitative research method that involves asking respondents a series of questions in order to gather information about a research subject. Interview questions can be close-ended or open-ended , and they prompt participants to provide valid information that is useful to the research.
An interview may also be structured, semi-structured , or unstructured , and this further influences the types of questions they include. Structured interviews are made up of more close-ended questions because they aim at gathering quantitative data while unstructured interviews consist, primarily, of open-ended questions that allow the researcher to collect qualitative information from respondents.
You can conduct interview research by scheduling a physical meeting with respondents, through a telephone conversation, and via digital media and video conferencing platforms like Skype and Zoom. Alternatively, you can use Formplus surveys and questionnaires for your interview.
Examples of interview questions include:
Quantitative research questions are questions that are used to gather quantifiable data from research subjects. These types of research questions are usually more specific and direct because they aim at collecting information that can be measured; that is, statistical information.
Descriptive research questions are inquiries that researchers use to gather quantifiable data about the attributes and characteristics of research subjects. These types of questions primarily seek responses that reveal existing patterns in the nature of the research subjects.
It is important to note that descriptive research questions are not concerned with the causative factors of the discovered attributes and characteristics. Rather, they focus on the “what”; that is, describing the subject of the research without paying attention to the reasons for its occurrence.
Descriptive research questions are typically closed-ended because they aim at gathering definite and specific responses from research participants. Also, they can be used in customer experience surveys and market research to collect information about target markets and consumer behaviors.
Descriptive Research Question Examples
A comparative research question is a type of quantitative research question that is used to gather information about the differences between two or more research subjects across different variables. These types of questions help the researcher to identify distinct features that mark one research subject from the other while highlighting existing similarities.
Asking comparative research questions in market research surveys can provide insights on how your product or service matches its competitors. In addition, it can help you to identify the strengths and weaknesses of your product for a better competitive advantage.
The 5 steps involved in the framing of comparative research questions are:
Comparative Research Question Samples
Just like the name suggests, a relationship-based research question is one that inquires into the nature of the association between two research subjects within the same demographic. These types of research questions help you to gather information pertaining to the nature of the association between two research variables.
Relationship-based research questions are also known as correlational research questions because they seek to clearly identify the link between 2 variables.
Read: Correlational Research Designs: Types, Examples & Methods
Examples of relationship-based research questions include:
Since research questions lie at the core of any systematic investigations, it is important to know how to frame a good research question. The right research questions will help you to gather the most objective responses that are useful to your systematic investigation.
A good research question is one that requires impartial responses and can be answered via existing sources of information. Also, a good research question seeks answers that actively contribute to a body of knowledge; hence, it is a question that is yet to be answered in your specific research context.
An open-ended question is a type of research question that does not restrict respondents to a set of premeditated answer options. In other words, it is a question that allows the respondent to freely express his or her perceptions and feelings towards the research subject.
Examples of Open-ended Questions
A close-ended question is a type of survey question that restricts respondents to a set of predetermined answers such as multiple-choice questions . Close-ended questions typically require yes or no answers and are commonly used in quantitative research to gather numerical data from research participants.
Examples of Close-ended Questions
A Likert scale question is a type of close-ended question that is structured as a 3-point, 5-point, or 7-point psychometric scale . This type of question is used to measure the survey respondent’s disposition towards multiple variables and it can be unipolar or bipolar in nature.
Example of Likert Scale Questions
A rating scale question is a type of close-ended question that seeks to associate a specific qualitative measure (rating) with the different variables in research. It is commonly used in customer experience surveys, market research surveys, employee reviews, and product evaluations.
Example of Rating Questions
Knowing what bad research questions are would help you avoid them in the course of your systematic investigation. These types of questions are usually unfocused and often result in research biases that can negatively impact the outcomes of your systematic investigation.
A loaded question is a question that subtly presupposes one or more unverified assumptions about the research subject or participant. This type of question typically boxes the respondent in a corner because it suggests implicit and explicit biases that prevent objective responses.
Example of Loaded Questions
A negative question is a type of question that is structured with an implicit or explicit negator. Negative questions can be misleading because they upturn the typical yes/no response order by requiring a negative answer for affirmation and an affirmative answer for negation.
Examples of Negative Questions
A l eading question is a type of survey question that nudges the respondent towards an already-determined answer. It is highly suggestive in nature and typically consists of biases and unverified assumptions that point toward its premeditated responses.
Examples of Leading Questions
Read More: Leading Questions: Definition, Types, and Examples
With Formplus, you can create and administer your online research questionnaire easily. In the form builder, you can add different form fields to your questionnaire and edit these fields to reflect specific research questions for your systematic investigation.
Here is a step-by-step guide on how to create an online research questionnaire with Formplus:
The success of your research starts with framing the right questions to help you collect the most valid and objective responses. Be sure to avoid bad research questions like loaded and negative questions that can be misleading and adversely affect your research data and outcomes.
Your research questions should clearly reflect the aims and objectives of your systematic investigation while laying emphasis on specific contexts. To help you seamlessly gather responses for your research questions, you can create an online research questionnaire on Formplus.
Connect to Formplus, Get Started Now - It's Free!
You may also like:
Learn how to write problem statements before commencing any research effort. Learn about its structure and explore examples
In this article, we’ll go through the concept of meta-analysis, what it can be used for, and how you can use it to improve how you...
In this article, we will share some tips for writing an effective abstract, plus samples you can learn from.
Introduction A research summary is a requirement during academic research and sometimes you might need to prepare a research summary...
Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. try formplus and transform your work productivity today..
Picture yourself on a road trip without a destination in mind — driving aimlessly, not knowing where you’re headed or how to get there. Similarly, your research is navigated by well-defined research aims and objectives. Research aims and objectives are the foundation of any research project. They provide a clear direction and purpose for the study, ensuring that you stay focused and on track throughout the process. They are your trusted navigational tools, leading you to success.
Understanding the relationship between research objectives and aims is crucial to any research project’s success, and we’re here to break it down for you in this article. Here, we’ll explore the importance of research aims and objectives, understand their differences, and delve into the impact they have on the quality of research.
In research, aims and objectives are two important components but are often used interchangeably. Though they may sound similar, they are distinct and serve different purposes.
Research aims are broad statements that describe the overall purpose of your study. They provide a general direction for your study and indicate the intended achievements of your research. Aims are usually written in a general and abstract manner describing the ultimate goal of the research.
Research objectives are specific, measurable, and achievable goals that you aim to accomplish within a specified timeframe. They break down the research aims into smaller, more manageable components and provide a clear picture of what you want to achieve and how you plan to achieve it.
In the example, the objectives provide specific targets that must be achieved to reach the aim. Essentially, aims provide the overall direction for the research while objectives provide specific targets that must be achieved to accomplish the aims. Aims provide a broad context for the research, while the objectives provide smaller steps that the researcher must take to accomplish the overall research goals. To illustrate, when planning a road trip, your research aim is the destination you want to reach, and your research objectives are the specific routes you need to take to get there.
Aims and objectives are interconnected. Objectives play a key role in defining the research methodology, providing a roadmap for how you’ll collect and analyze data, while aim is the final destination, which represents the ultimate goal of your research. By setting specific goals, you’ll be able to design a research plan that helps you achieve your objectives and, ultimately, your research aim.
The impact of clear research aims and objectives on the quality of research cannot be understated. But it’s not enough to simply have aims and objectives. Well-defined research aims and objectives are important for several reasons:
Formulating effective research aims and objectives involves a systematic process to ensure that they are clear, specific, achievable, and relevant. Start by asking yourself what you want to achieve through your research. What impact do you want your research to have? Once you have a clear understanding of your aims, you can then break them down into specific, achievable objectives. Here are some steps you can follow when developing research aims and objectives:
There are several common mistakes that researchers can make when writing research aims and objectives. These include:
To avoid these common pitfalls, it is important to be specific, clear, relevant, and realistic when writing research aims and objectives. Seek feedback from colleagues or supervisors to ensure that the aims and objectives are aligned with the research problem , questions, and methodology, and are achievable within the constraints of the research project. It’s important to continually refine your aims and objectives as you go. As you progress in your research, it’s not uncommon for research aims and objectives to evolve slightly, but it’s important that they remain consistent with the study conducted and the research topic.
In summary, research aims and objectives are the backbone of any successful research project. They give you the ability to cut through the noise and hone in on what really matters. By setting clear goals and aligning them with your research questions and methodology, you can ensure that your research is relevant, impactful, and of the highest quality. So, before you hit the road on your research journey, make sure you have a clear destination and steps to get there. Let us know in the comments section below the challenges you faced and the strategies you followed while fomulating research aims and objectives! Also, feel free to reach out to us at any stage of your research or publication by using #AskEnago and tagging @EnagoAcademy on Twitter , Facebook , and Quora . Happy researching!
This particular material has added important but overlooked concepts regarding my experiences in explaining research aims and objectives. Thank you
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
Academic Essay Writing Made Simple: 4 types and tips
The pen is mightier than the sword, they say, and nowhere is this more evident…
Language Quality Importance in Academia AI in Evaluating Language Quality Enago Language Reports Live Demo…
Imagine having to skim through and read mountains of research papers and books, only to…
In research, choosing the right approach to understand data is crucial for deriving meaningful insights.…
The process of choosing the right research design can put ourselves at the crossroads of…
Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for…
Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right…
Research Recommendations – Guiding policy-makers for evidence-based decision making
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
Which among these features would you prefer the most in a peer review assistant?
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Patricia farrugia.
* Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, the
† Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and the
‡ Departments of Surgery and
§ Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
There is an increasing familiarity with the principles of evidence-based medicine in the surgical community. As surgeons become more aware of the hierarchy of evidence, grades of recommendations and the principles of critical appraisal, they develop an increasing familiarity with research design. Surgeons and clinicians are looking more and more to the literature and clinical trials to guide their practice; as such, it is becoming a responsibility of the clinical research community to attempt to answer questions that are not only well thought out but also clinically relevant. The development of the research question, including a supportive hypothesis and objectives, is a necessary key step in producing clinically relevant results to be used in evidence-based practice. A well-defined and specific research question is more likely to help guide us in making decisions about study design and population and subsequently what data will be collected and analyzed. 1
In this article, we discuss important considerations in the development of a research question and hypothesis and in defining objectives for research. By the end of this article, the reader will be able to appreciate the significance of constructing a good research question and developing hypotheses and research objectives for the successful design of a research study. The following article is divided into 3 sections: research question, research hypothesis and research objectives.
Interest in a particular topic usually begins the research process, but it is the familiarity with the subject that helps define an appropriate research question for a study. 1 Questions then arise out of a perceived knowledge deficit within a subject area or field of study. 2 Indeed, Haynes suggests that it is important to know “where the boundary between current knowledge and ignorance lies.” 1 The challenge in developing an appropriate research question is in determining which clinical uncertainties could or should be studied and also rationalizing the need for their investigation.
Increasing one’s knowledge about the subject of interest can be accomplished in many ways. Appropriate methods include systematically searching the literature, in-depth interviews and focus groups with patients (and proxies) and interviews with experts in the field. In addition, awareness of current trends and technological advances can assist with the development of research questions. 2 It is imperative to understand what has been studied about a topic to date in order to further the knowledge that has been previously gathered on a topic. Indeed, some granting institutions (e.g., Canadian Institute for Health Research) encourage applicants to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence if a recent review does not already exist and preferably a pilot or feasibility study before applying for a grant for a full trial.
In-depth knowledge about a subject may generate a number of questions. It then becomes necessary to ask whether these questions can be answered through one study or if more than one study needed. 1 Additional research questions can be developed, but several basic principles should be taken into consideration. 1 All questions, primary and secondary, should be developed at the beginning and planning stages of a study. Any additional questions should never compromise the primary question because it is the primary research question that forms the basis of the hypothesis and study objectives. It must be kept in mind that within the scope of one study, the presence of a number of research questions will affect and potentially increase the complexity of both the study design and subsequent statistical analyses, not to mention the actual feasibility of answering every question. 1 A sensible strategy is to establish a single primary research question around which to focus the study plan. 3 In a study, the primary research question should be clearly stated at the end of the introduction of the grant proposal, and it usually specifies the population to be studied, the intervention to be implemented and other circumstantial factors. 4
Hulley and colleagues 2 have suggested the use of the FINER criteria in the development of a good research question ( Box 1 ). The FINER criteria highlight useful points that may increase the chances of developing a successful research project. A good research question should specify the population of interest, be of interest to the scientific community and potentially to the public, have clinical relevance and further current knowledge in the field (and of course be compliant with the standards of ethical boards and national research standards).
Feasible | ||
Interesting | ||
Novel | ||
Ethical | ||
Relevant |
Adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health. 2
Whereas the FINER criteria outline the important aspects of the question in general, a useful format to use in the development of a specific research question is the PICO format — consider the population (P) of interest, the intervention (I) being studied, the comparison (C) group (or to what is the intervention being compared) and the outcome of interest (O). 3 , 5 , 6 Often timing (T) is added to PICO ( Box 2 ) — that is, “Over what time frame will the study take place?” 1 The PICOT approach helps generate a question that aids in constructing the framework of the study and subsequently in protocol development by alluding to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and identifying the groups of patients to be included. Knowing the specific population of interest, intervention (and comparator) and outcome of interest may also help the researcher identify an appropriate outcome measurement tool. 7 The more defined the population of interest, and thus the more stringent the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the greater the effect on the interpretation and subsequent applicability and generalizability of the research findings. 1 , 2 A restricted study population (and exclusion criteria) may limit bias and increase the internal validity of the study; however, this approach will limit external validity of the study and, thus, the generalizability of the findings to the practical clinical setting. Conversely, a broadly defined study population and inclusion criteria may be representative of practical clinical practice but may increase bias and reduce the internal validity of the study.
Population (patients) | ||
Intervention (for intervention studies only) | ||
Comparison group | ||
Outcome of interest | ||
Time |
A poorly devised research question may affect the choice of study design, potentially lead to futile situations and, thus, hamper the chance of determining anything of clinical significance, which will then affect the potential for publication. Without devoting appropriate resources to developing the research question, the quality of the study and subsequent results may be compromised. During the initial stages of any research study, it is therefore imperative to formulate a research question that is both clinically relevant and answerable.
The primary research question should be driven by the hypothesis rather than the data. 1 , 2 That is, the research question and hypothesis should be developed before the start of the study. This sounds intuitive; however, if we take, for example, a database of information, it is potentially possible to perform multiple statistical comparisons of groups within the database to find a statistically significant association. This could then lead one to work backward from the data and develop the “question.” This is counterintuitive to the process because the question is asked specifically to then find the answer, thus collecting data along the way (i.e., in a prospective manner). Multiple statistical testing of associations from data previously collected could potentially lead to spuriously positive findings of association through chance alone. 2 Therefore, a good hypothesis must be based on a good research question at the start of a trial and, indeed, drive data collection for the study.
The research or clinical hypothesis is developed from the research question and then the main elements of the study — sampling strategy, intervention (if applicable), comparison and outcome variables — are summarized in a form that establishes the basis for testing, statistical and ultimately clinical significance. 3 For example, in a research study comparing computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus freehand acetabular component placement in patients in need of total hip arthroplasty, the experimental group would be computer-assisted insertion and the control/conventional group would be free-hand placement. The investigative team would first state a research hypothesis. This could be expressed as a single outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to improved functional outcome) or potentially as a complex/composite outcome; that is, more than one outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to both improved radiographic cup placement and improved functional outcome).
However, when formally testing statistical significance, the hypothesis should be stated as a “null” hypothesis. 2 The purpose of hypothesis testing is to make an inference about the population of interest on the basis of a random sample taken from that population. The null hypothesis for the preceding research hypothesis then would be that there is no difference in mean functional outcome between the computer-assisted insertion and free-hand placement techniques. After forming the null hypothesis, the researchers would form an alternate hypothesis stating the nature of the difference, if it should appear. The alternate hypothesis would be that there is a difference in mean functional outcome between these techniques. At the end of the study, the null hypothesis is then tested statistically. If the findings of the study are not statistically significant (i.e., there is no difference in functional outcome between the groups in a statistical sense), we cannot reject the null hypothesis, whereas if the findings were significant, we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis (i.e., there is a difference in mean functional outcome between the study groups), errors in testing notwithstanding. In other words, hypothesis testing confirms or refutes the statement that the observed findings did not occur by chance alone but rather occurred because there was a true difference in outcomes between these surgical procedures. The concept of statistical hypothesis testing is complex, and the details are beyond the scope of this article.
Another important concept inherent in hypothesis testing is whether the hypotheses will be 1-sided or 2-sided. A 2-sided hypothesis states that there is a difference between the experimental group and the control group, but it does not specify in advance the expected direction of the difference. For example, we asked whether there is there an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery or whether the outcomes worse with computer-assisted surgery. We presented a 2-sided test in the above example because we did not specify the direction of the difference. A 1-sided hypothesis states a specific direction (e.g., there is an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery). A 2-sided hypothesis should be used unless there is a good justification for using a 1-sided hypothesis. As Bland and Atlman 8 stated, “One-sided hypothesis testing should never be used as a device to make a conventionally nonsignificant difference significant.”
The research hypothesis should be stated at the beginning of the study to guide the objectives for research. Whereas the investigators may state the hypothesis as being 1-sided (there is an improvement with treatment), the study and investigators must adhere to the concept of clinical equipoise. According to this principle, a clinical (or surgical) trial is ethical only if the expert community is uncertain about the relative therapeutic merits of the experimental and control groups being evaluated. 9 It means there must exist an honest and professional disagreement among expert clinicians about the preferred treatment. 9
Designing a research hypothesis is supported by a good research question and will influence the type of research design for the study. Acting on the principles of appropriate hypothesis development, the study can then confidently proceed to the development of the research objective.
The primary objective should be coupled with the hypothesis of the study. Study objectives define the specific aims of the study and should be clearly stated in the introduction of the research protocol. 7 From our previous example and using the investigative hypothesis that there is a difference in functional outcomes between computer-assisted acetabular component placement and free-hand placement, the primary objective can be stated as follows: this study will compare the functional outcomes of computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus free-hand placement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Note that the study objective is an active statement about how the study is going to answer the specific research question. Objectives can (and often do) state exactly which outcome measures are going to be used within their statements. They are important because they not only help guide the development of the protocol and design of study but also play a role in sample size calculations and determining the power of the study. 7 These concepts will be discussed in other articles in this series.
From the surgeon’s point of view, it is important for the study objectives to be focused on outcomes that are important to patients and clinically relevant. For example, the most methodologically sound randomized controlled trial comparing 2 techniques of distal radial fixation would have little or no clinical impact if the primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on intraoperative fluoroscopy time. However, if the objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on patient functional outcome at 1 year, this would have a much more significant impact on clinical decision-making. Second, more meaningful surgeon–patient discussions could ensue, incorporating patient values and preferences with the results from this study. 6 , 7 It is the precise objective and what the investigator is trying to measure that is of clinical relevance in the practical setting.
The following is an example from the literature about the relation between the research question, hypothesis and study objectives:
Study: Warden SJ, Metcalf BR, Kiss ZS, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology 2008;47:467–71.
Research question: How does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) compare with a placebo device in managing the symptoms of skeletally mature patients with patellar tendinopathy?
Research hypothesis: Pain levels are reduced in patients who receive daily active-LIPUS (treatment) for 12 weeks compared with individuals who receive inactive-LIPUS (placebo).
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of LIPUS in the management of patellar tendinopathy symptoms.
The development of the research question is the most important aspect of a research project. A research project can fail if the objectives and hypothesis are poorly focused and underdeveloped. Useful tips for surgical researchers are provided in Box 3 . Designing and developing an appropriate and relevant research question, hypothesis and objectives can be a difficult task. The critical appraisal of the research question used in a study is vital to the application of the findings to clinical practice. Focusing resources, time and dedication to these 3 very important tasks will help to guide a successful research project, influence interpretation of the results and affect future publication efforts.
FINER = feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, relevant; PICOT = population (patients), intervention (for intervention studies only), comparison group, outcome of interest, time.
Competing interests: No funding was received in preparation of this paper. Dr. Bhandari was funded, in part, by a Canada Research Chair, McMaster University.
Mar 6, 2019
Have you checked out the rest of The PhD Knowledge Base ? It’s home to hundreds more free resources and guides, written especially for PhD students.
How long does it take the person reading your thesis to understand what you’re doing and how you’re doing it? If the answer is anything other than ’in the opening paragraphs of the thesis’ then keep reading.
If you tell them as early as possible what you’re doing and how you’re doing it – and do so in clear and simple terms – whatever you write after will make much more sense. If you leave them guessing for ten pages, everything they read in those ten pages has no coherence. You’ll know where it is all leading, but they won’t.
Unless you tell them.
If you tell the reader what you’re doing as early as possible in clear and simple terms, whatever you write after will make much more sense.
If you build a house without foundations, it’s pretty obvious what will happen. It’ll collapse. Your thesis is the same; fail to build the foundations and your thesis just won’t work .
Your aims and objectives are those foundations. That’s why we’ve put them right at the top of our PhD Writing Template (if you haven’t already downloaded it, join the thousands who have by clicking here ).
If you write your aims and objectives clearly then you’ll make your reader’s life easier.
A lot of students fail to clearly articulate their aims and objectives because they aren’t sure themselves what they actually are.
Picture this: if there’s one thing that every PhD student hates it’s being asked by a stranger what their research is on.
Use our free PhD structure template to quickly visualise every element of your thesis.
Sounds good, doesn’t it? Be able to call yourself Doctor sooner with our five-star rated How to Write A PhD email-course. Learn everything your supervisor should have taught you about planning and completing a PhD.
Now half price. Join hundreds of other students and become a better thesis writer, or your money back.
Your research aims are the answer to the question, ‘What are you doing?’
1. You need to clearly describe what your intentions are and what you hope to achieve. These are your aims.
2. Your aims may be to test theory in a new empirical setting, derive new theory entirely, construct a new data-set, replicate an existing study, question existing orthodoxy, and so on. Whatever they are, clearly articulate them and do so early. Definitely include them in your introduction and, if you’re smart, you’ll write them in your abstract .
3. Be very explicit . In the opening paragraphs, say, in simple terms, ‘ the aim of this thesis is to …’
4. Think of your aims then as a statement of intent. They are a promise to the reader that you are going to do something. You use the next two hundred pages or so to follow through on that promise. If you don’t make the promise, the reader won’t understand your follow-through. Simple as that.
Because they serve as the starting point of the study, there needs to be a flow from your aims through your objectives (more on this below) to your research questions and contribution and then into the study itself. If you have completed your research and found that you answered a different question (not that uncommon), make sure your original aims are still valid. If they aren’t, refine them.
If you struggle to explain in simple terms what your research is about and why it matters, you may need to refine your aims and objectives to make them more concise.
When writing up your aims, there are a number of things to bear in mind.
1. Avoid listing too many. Your PhD isn’t as long as you think it is and you won’t have time or room for more than around two or three.
2. When you write them up, be very specific. Don’t leave things so vague that the reader is left unsure or unclear on what you aim to achieve.
3. Make sure there is a logical flow between each of your aims. They should make sense together and should each be separate components which, when added together, are bigger than the sum of their parts.
Your aims answer the question, ‘What are you doing?’ The objectives are the answer to the question, ‘How are you doing it?’
Research objectives refer to the goals or steps that you will take to achieve your aims.
When you write them, make sure they are SMART.
You need to be as explicit as possible here. Leave the reader in no doubt about what you will do to achieve your aims. Step by step. Leave no ambiguity. At the same time, be careful not to repeat your methods chapter here. Just hint at your methods by presenting the headlines. You’ll have plenty of space in your methods discussion to flesh out the detail.
Elsewhere in the thesis you will necessarily have to talk in a complex language and juggle complex ideas. Here you don’t. You can write in clear, plain sentences.
The aims of a study describe what you hope to achieve. The objectives detail how you are going to achieve your aims.
Let’s use an example to illustrate.
Objectives:
If you’re still struggling, Professor Pat Thompson’s great blog has a guide that will help.
Leave the reader in no doubt about what you will do to achieve your aims. Step by step. Leave no ambiguity.
Of course your research is complex. That’s the name of the game. But the sign of someone being able to master complexity is their ability to summarise it . Sure, you’re not looking to capture all the richness and detail in a short summary of aims and objectives, but you are looking to tell the reader what you’re doing and how you’re doing it.
If you’re struggling to clearly articulate your aims and objectives, then try the following task. At the top of a Post-it note write the sentence: ‘In this research I will…’. Then keep trying until you can fit an answer onto one single Post-it note. The answer should answer two questions: what are are you doing and how are you doing it?
Remember – whenever you write, make it as clear as possible. Pay attention to the words ‘as possible’ there. That means you should write as clearly as you can given the fact that your subject and research is necessarily complex. Think of it the other way: it’s about not making things more complicated and unclear than they need to be.
In other words, make your reader’s job as easy as you can. They’ll thank you for it.
If you’re still having trouble, get in touch to arrange a one-on-one coaching session and we can work through your aims and objectives together.
32 comments.
The write up is quite inspiring.
My topic is setting up a healing gardens in hospitals Need a aim and objectives for a dissertation
Dis is really good and more understandable thanks
Crisp, concise, and easy to understnad. Thank you for posint this. I now know how to write up my report.
Great. Glad you found it useful.
Good piece of work! Very useful
Great. Glad you found it useful!
The write up makes sense
Great. Thanks!
I love this article. Amazing, outstanding and incredible facts.
Glad you found it useful!
Well written and easy to follow
Thank you for the comment, I’m really glad you found it valuable.
I’m currently developing a dissertation proposal for my PhD in organizational leadership. I need guidance in writing my proposal
Hey – have you checked out this guide? https://www.thephdproofreaders.com/writing/how-to-write-a-phd-proposal/
Indeed I’m impressed and gained a lot from this and I hope I can write an acceptable thesis with this your guide. Bello, H.K
Great. Thanks for the kind words. Good luck with the thesis.
Thumbs up! God job, well done. The information is quite concise and straight to the point.
Glad you thought so – good luck with the writing.
Dear Max, thank you so much for your work and efforts!
Your explanation about Aims and Objectives really helped me out. However, I got stuck with other parts of the Aims and Objectives Work Sheet: Scope, Main Argument, and Contribution.
Could you please explain these as well, preferably including some examples?
Thanks for your kind words. Your question is a big one! Without knowing lots about your topics/subject I’m not able to provide tailored advice, but broadly speaking your scope is the aims/objectives, your main argument is the thread running through the thesis (i.e. what your thesis is trying to argue) and the contribution (again, broadly speaking) is that gap you are filling.
I love your website and you’ve been so SO helpful..
DUMB QUESTION ALERT: Is there supposed to be a difference between aims and research question?
I mean, using your own example.. if the aim of my research is: “To understand the contribution that local governments make to national level energy policy” then wouldn’t the research question be: “How do local governments contribute to energy policy at national level”?
I am sorry if this comes out as completely obvious but I am at that stage of confusion where I am starting to question everything I know.
Sorry it’s taken me so long to reply! It’s not a dumb question at all. The aim of the study is what the study as a whole is seeking to achieve. So that might be the gap it is filling/the contribution it is making. The research questions are your means to achieving that aim. Your aim might be to fill a gap in knowledge, and you then may have a small number of questions that help you along that path. Does that make sense?
Thank you Max for this post! So helpful!
Thanks Anna!
Thanks so much this piece. I have written both bachelor’s and master’s thesis but haven’t read this made me feel like I didn’t know anything about research at all. I gained more insight into aims and objectives of academic researches.
Interesting explanation. Thank you.
I’m glad you found it useful.
Hi… I really like the way it is put “What are you going?” (Aims) and “How are you doing it?” (Objectives). Simple and straightforward. Thanks for making aims and objectives easy to understand.
Thank you for the write up it is insightful. if you are ask to discuss your doctoral aims. that means: what you are doing how you are doing it.
I was totally lost and still in the woods to the point of thinking I am dull, but looking at how you are coaching it tells me that i am just a student who needs to understand the lesson. I now believe that with your guidance i will pass my PhD. I am writing on an otherwise obvious subject, Value addition to raw materials, why Africa has failed to add value to raw materials? Difficult question as answers seem to abound, but that is where i differ and i seem to be against the general tide. However with your guidance I believe i will make it. Thanks.
Thanks for your lovely, kind words. So kind.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Most popular articles from the phd knowlege base.
What’s the difference between research aims and objectives.
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.
Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.
A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.
The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.
Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .
However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:
Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them.
In general, they should be:
All research questions should be:
Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .
Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.
I will compare …
Your research objectives indicate how you’ll try to address your research problem and should be specific:
Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.
They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.
Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .
The main guidelines for formatting a paper in Chicago style are to:
To automatically generate accurate Chicago references, you can use Scribbr’s free Chicago reference generator .
The main guidelines for formatting a paper in MLA style are as follows:
To format a paper in APA Style , follow these guidelines:
No, it’s not appropriate to present new arguments or evidence in the conclusion . While you might be tempted to save a striking argument for last, research papers follow a more formal structure than this.
All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the results and discussion sections if you are following a scientific structure). The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.
The conclusion of a research paper has several key elements you should make sure to include:
Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.
This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .
The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .
A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.
The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:
and your problem statement
Want to contact us directly? No problem. We are always here for you.
Our team helps students graduate by offering:
Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:
Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .
The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.
The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.
You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .
Advertisement
This study aims to provide an overview of the recent developments in understanding multiscale traumatic brain injury (TBI) mechanisms from a multidisciplinary perspective. TBI is a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting people of all ages, genders, and races. On average, in every 5 s, someone in the U.S. experiences TBI-related injuries. According to the CDC, in 2019, there were more than 200,000 TBI-related hospitalizations in the USA. TBI is the most common traumatic injury in the U.S. military. As such, researchers from different fields attempt to investigate TBI risks and propose injury criteria. Yet, a unified TBI risk criterion is not available. This is primarily because the human brain has an overly complex and multiscale anatomy. From a length scale standpoint, the existing brain injury thresholds can be divided over three main scales and criteria: macroscale, tissue level, and cellular level. Macroscale criteria use quantifiable parameters such as acceleration and pressure that are typically taken on or near the head surface. Tissue level criteria are based on internal stress or strain-based injury analysis. Cellular-level injury analyses are based on molecular-level computations and cell culture, which is an emerging sector in brain injury threshold detection. However, there is a significant gap in the literature on connecting the parameters of the three scales and establishing a comprehensive injury criterion. We reviewed a combination of recent multidisciplinary evidence-informed literature and tried to connect the gaps by combining the three scales of TBI. Finally, we summarized the future challenges researchers may face and how we can approach and make progress in detecting TBI accurately.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
A.I. King, et al., Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration. In: IRCOBI conference. Lisbon, Portugal (2003)
D.H. Daneshvar et al., The epidemiology of sport-related concussion. Clin. Sports Med. 30 (1), 1–17 (2011)
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
C.W. Gadd, Use of a weighted-impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard. SAE Tech. Pap. (1966). https://doi.org/10.4271/660793
Article Google Scholar
T.A. Gennarelli, L.E. Thibault, Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. J. Trauma 22 (8), 680–686 (1982)
H. Kimpara, M. Iwamoto, Mild traumatic brain injury predictors based on angular accelerations during impacts. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40 (1), 114–126 (2012)
S. Kleiven, Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. SAE Tech. Pap. (2007). https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-22-0003
L.E. Thibault, T.A. Gennarelli, Biomechanics of diffuse brain injuries. SAE Technical Paper (1985)
F. Germanetti et al., Injury criteria for vehicle safety assessment: a review with a focus using human body models. Vehicles. 4 (4), 1080–1095 (2022)
E.G. Takhounts, et al., Kinematic rotational brain injury criterion (BRIC). In: Proceedings of the 22nd enhanced safety of vehicles conference. Paper (2011)
F.A. Azevedo et al., Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. J. Comparat. Neurol. 513 (5), 532–541 (2009)
K.L. Bigos, A.R. Hariri, D.R. Weinberger, Neuroimaging genetics: principles and practices (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016)
Book Google Scholar
M.A. Patestas, L.P. Gartner, A textbook of neuroanatomy (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2016)
Google Scholar
F. Hasan et al., Cavitation induced damage in soft biomaterials. Multisc. Sci. Eng. 3 (1), 67–87 (2021)
M.I. Khan, S.F. Ferdous, A. Adnan, Mechanical behavior of actin and spectrin subjected to high strain rate: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19 , 1738–1749 (2021)
M.I. Khan et al., Effect of strain rate on single tau, dimerized tau and tau-microtubule interface: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Biomolecules 11 (9), 1308 (2021)
K.A.H.A. Mahmud et al., Shock-induced damage mechanism of perineuronal nets. Biomolecules 12 (1), 10 (2021)
R.D. Gonzalez-Cruz et al., Cortical spheroids show strain-dependent cell viability loss and neurite disruption following sustained compression injury. bioRxiv. 3 , 230 (2023)
E. Bar-Kochba et al., Strain and rate-dependent neuronal injury in a 3D in vitro compression model of traumatic brain injury. Sci. Rep. 6 (1), 30550 (2016)
J.B. Estrada et al., Microcavitation as a neuronal damage mechanism in blast traumatic brain injury. Biophys. J. 110 (3), 320a (2016)
X. Jin et al., Biomechanical response of the bovine pia-arachnoid complex to tensile loading at varying strain rates. SAE Tech. Pap. (2006). https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-22-0025
P.B.G. Alvez, Inference of a human brain fiber bundle atlas from high angular resolution diffusion imaging (Université Paris Sud-Paris XI, Paris, 2011)
G. Stuart, N. Spruston, M. Häusser, Dendrites (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016)
A. Konietzny, J. Bär, M. Mikhaylova, Dendritic actin cytoskeleton: structure, functions, and regulations. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 11 , 147 (2017)
E. Pchitskaya, I. Bezprozvanny, Dendritic spines shape analysis—classification or clusterization? Perspective. Front. Syn. Neurosci. 12 , 31 (2020)
Y. Poitelon, A.M. Kopec, S. Belin, Myelin fat facts: an overview of lipids and fatty acid metabolism. Cells 9 (4), 812 (2020)
J. Salzer, B. Zalc, Myelination. Curr. Biol. 26 (20), R971–R975 (2016)
J.L. Salzer, Schwann cell myelination. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7 (8), a020529 (2015)
A. Montanino, Definition of axonal injury tolerances across scales: a computational multiscale approach (Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Stockholm, 2020)
D.A. Fletcher, R.D. Mullins, Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463 (7280), 485–492 (2010)
J.A. Wolf et al., Traumatic axonal injury induces calcium influx modulated by tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium channels. J. Neurosci. 21 (6), 1923–1930 (2001)
R.M. Wright, A computational model for traumatic brain injury based on an axonal injury criterion (The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 2012)
E. Gurdjian et al., Studies on experimental concussion: relation of physiologic effect to time duration of intracranial pressure increase at impact. Neurology 4 (9), 674–674 (1954)
S. Kallakuri et al., Neuronal injury and glial changes are hallmarks of open field blast exposure in swine frontal lobe. PLoS One 12 (1), e0169239 (2017)
A. Kalra et al., Development and validation of a numerical model of the swine head subjected to open-field blasts. Shock Waves 27 , 947–964 (2017)
M. Franklyn, P.V.S. Lee, Military injury biomechanics: the cause and prevention of impact injuries (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017)
A.I. King, The biomechanics of impact injury. In: Medicine and science in sports and exercise: Springer, Chem (2018)
L.B. Drew, W.E. Drew, The contrecoup-coup phenomenon: a new understanding of the mechanism of closed head injury. Neurocrit. Care 1 , 385–390 (2004)
K.-U. Schmitt et al., Trauma biomechanics: an introduction to injury biomechanics (Springer, Berlin, 2019)
N.D. Osier et al., Chronic histopathological and behavioral outcomes of experimental traumatic brain injury in adult male animals. J. Neurotrauma 32 (23), 1861–1882 (2015)
V. Di Pietro et al., Potentially neuroprotective gene modulation in an in vitro model of mild traumatic brain injury. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 375 , 185–198 (2013)
C.S. Hill, M.P. Coleman, D.K. Menon, Traumatic axonal injury: mechanisms and translational opportunities. Trends Neurosci. 39 (5), 311–324 (2016)
J.R. Loverde, B.J. Pfister, Developmental axon stretch stimulates neuron growth while maintaining normal electrical activity, intracellular calcium flux, and somatic morphology. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9 , 308 (2015)
C. Gu, Rapid and reversible development of axonal varicosities: a new form of neural plasticity. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 14 , 610857 (2021)
Y. Gu et al., Polarity of varicosity initiation in central neuron mechanosensation. J. Cell Biol. 216 (7), 2179–2199 (2017)
K.V. Kolaric et al., Focal axonal swellings and associated ultrastructural changes attenuate conduction velocity in central nervous system axons: a computer modeling study. Physiol. Rep. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/phy2.59
I. Nikić et al., A reversible form of axon damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med. 17 (4), 495–499 (2011)
C. Sun et al., Immediate induction of varicosities by transverse compression but not uniaxial stretch in axon mechanosensation. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 10 (1), 1–17 (2022)
M.D. Tang-Schomer et al., Partial interruption of axonal transport due to microtubule breakage accounts for the formation of periodic varicosities after traumatic axonal injury. Exp. Neurol. 233 (1), 364–372 (2012)
J. Wang, R.J. Hamm, J.T. Povlishock, Traumatic axonal injury in the optic nerve: evidence for axonal swelling, disconnection, dieback, and reorganization. J. Neurotrauma 28 (7), 1185–1198 (2011)
Z. Doganyigit et al., The role of neuroinflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury: a narrative review. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 13 (13), 1835–1848 (2022)
T. Shabab et al., Neuroinflammation pathways: a general review. Int. J. Neurosci. 127 (7), 624–633 (2017)
D.W. Simon et al., The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13 (3), 171–191 (2017)
F. Bianchi et al., Ion current and action potential alterations in peripheral neurons subject to uniaxial strain. J. Neurosci. Res. 97 (7), 744–751 (2019)
S.A. Freeman et al., Mechanisms of sodium channel clustering and its influence on axonal impulse conduction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73 , 723–735 (2016)
P.D. Maia, J.N. Kutz, Identifying critical regions for spike propagation in axon segments. J. Comput. Neurosci. 36 , 141–155 (2014)
M. Tamayo-Elizalde et al., Action potential alterations induced by single F11 neuronal cell loading. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 162 , 141–153 (2021)
P.-A. Boucher, B. Joós, C.E. Morris, Coupled left-shift of Nav channels: modeling the Na+-loading and dysfunctional excitability of damaged axons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 33 , 301–319 (2012)
H. Chen, D. Garcia-Gonzalez, A. Jérusalem, Computational model of the mechanoelectrophysiological coupling in axons with application to neuromodulation. Phys. Rev. E 99 (3), 032406 (2019)
J. Engelbrecht, et al., On modelling of physical effects accompanying the propagation of action potentials in nerve fibres (2016) arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.01867
A. Jérusalem et al., A computational model coupling mechanics and electrophysiology in spinal cord injury. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 13 , 883–896 (2014)
M.T. Kwong et al., 3D finite element formulation for mechanical–electrophysiological coupling in axonopathy. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 346 , 1025–1050 (2019)
M.J. Sætra, G.T. Einevoll, G. Halnes, An electrodiffusive neuron-extracellular-glia model for exploring the genesis of slow potentials in the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17 (7), e1008143 (2021)
Y.-T. Wu, K. Gilpin, A. Adnan, Effects of focal axonal swelling level on the action potential signal transmission. J. Comput. Neurosci. 48 , 253–263 (2020)
G. Krabbel, Ein rechnerisches Schädel-Hirn-Modell zur Untersuchung dynamischer Belastungen des Kopfes (1998)
J. Newman, et al., A new biomechanical assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. Part 2: results and conclusions. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conference. International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (2000)
H. Kimpara et al., Head injury prediction methods based on 6 degree of freedom head acceleration measurements during impact. Int. J. Automot. Eng. 2 (2), 13–19 (2011)
J. Newman, A generalized acceleration model for brain injury threshold (GAMBIT). In: Proceedings of International IRCOBI Conference (1986)
F. Feist, et al., Pedestrian collisions with flat-fronted vehicles: injury patterns and importance of rotational accelerations as a predictor for traumatic brain injury (TBI). In: 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) (2009)
F. Kramer, Passive sicherheit von kraftfahrzeugen (Springer, Berlin, 2009)
A.K. Ommaya, Biomechanics of head injuries: experimental aspects. Biomech. Trauma. (1984)
E.J. Pellman et al., Concussion in professional football: epidemiological features of game injuries and review of the literature—part 3. Neurosurgery 54 (1), 81–96 (2004)
S. Rowson et al., Rotational head kinematics in football impacts: an injury risk function for concussion. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40 , 1–13 (2012)
C. Ward, M. Chan, A. Nahum, Intracranial pressure—a brain injury criterion. SAE Trans. 89 , 3867–3880 (1980)
J.A. Newman, Design and testing of sports helmets: biomechanical and practical considerations. In: Accidental injury: biomechanics and prevention (Springer, Berlin, 2014), pp.755–768
M. Claessens, F. Sauren, J. Wismans, Modeling of the human head under impact conditions: a parametric study. SAE Trans. 106 , 3829–3848 (1997)
Anderson, R.W., et al. Mechanisms of axonal injury: an experimental and numerical study of a sheep model of head impact. In: Proc. International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) (1999)
A.C. Bain, D.F. Meaney, Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 122 (6), 615–622 (2000)
C. Deck, R. Willinger, Improved head injury criteria based on head FE model. Int. J. Crashworth. 13 (6), 667–678 (2008)
S.S. Margulies, L.E. Thibault, A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. J. Biomech. 25 (8), 917–923 (1992)
E.G. Takhounts et al., Development of brain injury criteria (Br IC). SAE Tech. Pap. (2013). https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-22-0010
R. Willinger, C. Deck, N. Bourdet, From Head Trauma Biomechanics Research to Industrial Application. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium of Human Modelling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering, Berlin, Germany (2018)
J. Davidsson, M. Angeria, M. Risling, Injury threshold for sagittal plane rotational induced diffuse axonal injuries. In: Proceedings of the International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact (IRCOBI) (2009)
W.N. Hardy et al., Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar X-ray. SAE Tech. Pap. (2001). https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-22-0016
W.N. Hardy et al., A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J. 51 , 17 (2007)
S. Koumlis et al., Glial model for traumatic brain injury: network strain field and inflammation induced by repeated mechanical impacts in vitro. Exp. Mech. 58 , 125–135 (2018)
H. Ahmadzadeh, D.H. Smith, V.B. Shenoy, Mechanical effects of dynamic binding between tau proteins on microtubules during axonal injury. Biophys. J. 109 (11), 2328–2337 (2015)
M.N.B. Hossain, A. Adnan, Mechanical characterization of spectrin at the molecular level. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 16631 (2024)
F. Hasan et al., Viscoelastic damage evaluation of the axon. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10 , 904818 (2022)
A. Tamura et al., Variation in nerve fiber strain in brain tissue subjected to uniaxial stretch. SAE Tech. Pap. (2007). https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-22-0006
T. Palomares et al., The neuroprotective effect of conditioned medium from human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells is impaired by N -acetyl cysteine supplementation. Mol. Neurobiol. 55 , 13–25 (2018)
J.B. Estrada et al., Neural cell injury pathology due to high-rate mechanical loading. Brain Multiphys. 2 , 100034 (2021)
M.E. Edwards, S.S.S. Wang, T.A. Good, Role of viscoelastic properties of differentiated SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells in cyclic shear stress injury. Biotechnol. Prog. 17 (4), 760–767 (2001)
M.C. LaPlaca et al., High rate shear strain of three-dimensional neural cell cultures: a new in vitro traumatic brain injury model. J. Biomech. 38 (5), 1093–1105 (2005)
M. Skotak, F. Wang, N. Chandra, An in vitro injury model for SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: effect of strain and strain rate. J. Neurosci. Methods 205 (1), 159–168 (2012)
Y. Zhang et al., Modeling of the axon membrane skeleton structure and implications for its mechanical properties. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13 (2), e1005407 (2017)
Y.-T. Wu, A. Adnan, Damage and failure of axonal microtubule under extreme high strain rate: an in-silico molecular dynamics study. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 12260 (2018)
R. Shi, J. Whitebone, Conduction deficits and membrane disruption of spinal cord axons as a function of magnitude and rate of strain. J. Neurophysiol. 95 (6), 3384–3390 (2006)
Y. Li et al., A precise, controllable in vitro model for diffuse axonal injury through uniaxial stretch injury. Front. Neurosci. 13 , 1063 (2019)
Y.C. Yap et al., Mild and repetitive very mild axonal stretch injury triggers cystoskeletal mislocalization and growth cone collapse. PLoS One 12 (5), e0176997 (2017)
F. Alisafaei et al., Mechanisms of local stress amplification in axons near the gray-white matter interface. Biophys. J . 119 (7), 1290–1300 (2020)
Y. Feng et al., Relative brain displacement and deformation during constrained mild frontal head impact. J. R. Soc. Interface 7 (53), 1677–1688 (2010)
M.N.I. Rifat, A. Adnan, Axonal varicosity leading to combined effect of stretching and swelling on action potential transmission: a computational study. Multisc. Sci. Eng. 6 (1), 33–47 (2024)
F.H. Kobeissy et al., Elevation of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in rat serum after acute methamphetamine treatment and traumatic brain injury. J. Mol. Neurosci. 72 , 1–11 (2022)
D.J. DiSabato, N. Quan, J.P. Godbout, Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. J. Neurochem. 139 , 136–153 (2016)
I. Mavroudis et al., A systematic review and meta-analysis of the inflammatory biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury. Biomedicines. 12 (2), 293 (2024)
P. Mellergård et al., Differences in cerebral extracellular response of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 after subarachnoid hemorrhage or severe head trauma in humans. Neurosurgery 68 (1), 12–19 (2011)
A. Vedantam et al., Early versus late profiles of inflammatory cytokines after mild traumatic brain injury and their association with neuropsychological outcomes. J. Neurotrauma 38 (1), 53–62 (2021)
E.L. Nwachuku et al., Time course of cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory biomarkers and relationship to 6-month neurologic outcome in adult severe traumatic brain injury. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 149 , 1–5 (2016)
W. Chen et al., Cytokine cascades induced by mechanical trauma injury alter voltage-gated sodium channel activity in intact cortical neurons. J. Neuroinflamm. 14 , 1–11 (2017)
M. Eisenhut, H. Wallace, Ion channels in inflammation. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 461 , 401–421 (2011)
S.-H. Ma et al., Interleukin-6 inhibits L-type calcium channel activity of cultured cerebellar granule neurons. J. Physiol. Sci. 62 , 385–392 (2012)
C. Zhou et al., Interleukin-1β inhibits voltage-gated sodium currents in a time-and dose-dependent manner in cortical neurons. Neurochem. Res. 36 , 1116–1123 (2011)
D. Isbrandt, A mechanistic link between glia and neuronal excitability in acute neuroinflammation. J. Physiol. 595 (3), 603–604 (2017)
S.N. Kurki et al., Acute neuroinflammation leads to disruption of neuronal chloride regulation and consequent hyperexcitability in the dentate gyrus. Cell Rep. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113379
S. Wei et al., TNF-α acutely enhances acid-sensing ion channel currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons via a p38 MAPK pathway. J. Neuroinflamm. 18 , 1–10 (2021)
H. Ahmadzadeh, D.H. Smith, V.B. Shenoy, Viscoelasticity of tau proteins leads to strain rate-dependent breaking of microtubules during axonal stretch injury: predictions from a mathematical model. Biophys. J . 106 (5), 1123–1133 (2014)
R.C. Armstrong et al., White matter involvement after TBI: clues to axon and myelin repair capacity. Exp. Neurol. 275 , 328–333 (2016)
C.M. Marion, D.P. McDaniel, R.C. Armstrong, Sarm1 deletion reduces axon damage, demyelination, and white matter atrophy after experimental traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 321 , 113040 (2019)
W.L. Maxwell, Damage to myelin and oligodendrocytes: a role in chronic outcomes following traumatic brain injury? Brain Sci. 3 (3), 1374–1394 (2013)
M.C. Liu et al., Extensive degradation of myelin basic protein isoforms by calpain following traumatic brain injury. J. Neurochem. 98 (3), 700–712 (2006)
A.J. Mierzwa et al., Components of myelin damage and repair in the progression of white matter pathology after mild traumatic brain injury. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 74 (3), 218–232 (2015)
T. Taib et al., Neuroinflammation, myelin and behavior: temporal patterns following mild traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS One 12 (9), e0184811 (2017)
L. Picas, F. Rico, S. Scheuring, Direct measurement of the mechanical properties of lipid phases in supported bilayers. Biophys. J . 102 (1), L01–L03 (2012)
G. Ayton et al., Calculating the bulk modulus for a lipid bilayer with nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys. J . 82 (3), 1226–1238 (2002)
M. Saeedimasine et al., Elucidating axonal injuries through molecular modelling of myelin sheaths and nodes of Ranvier. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8 , 669897 (2021)
J. Kim et al., Mechanical stretch induces myelin protein loss in oligodendrocytes by activating Erk1/2 in a calcium-dependent manner. Glia 68 (10), 2070–2085 (2020)
J. Eid et al., On calculating the bending modulus of lipid bilayer membranes from buckling simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 124 (29), 6299–6311 (2020)
V.M. Weaver, Cell and tissue mechanics: the new cell biology frontier. Am. Soc. Cell Biol. 28 , 1815–1818 (2017)
T.J. Orr et al., Traumatic brain injury: a comprehensive review of biomechanics and molecular pathophysiology. World Neurosurg. 185 , 74–88 (2024)
X. Li, Z. Zhou, S. Kleiven, An anatomically detailed and personalizable head injury model: significance of brain and white matter tract morphological variability on strain. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 20 , 403–431 (2021)
R. De Rooij, E. Kuhl, Physical biology of axonal damage. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12 , 144 (2018)
A. Goriely et al., Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 14 , 931–965 (2015)
R.M. Greenwald et al., Head impact severity measures for evaluating mild traumatic brain injury risk exposure. Neurosurgery 62 (4), 789 (2008)
C. Giordano, S. Zappalà, S. Kleiven, Anisotropic finite element models for brain injury prediction: the sensitivity of axonal strain to white matter tract inter-subject variability. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 16 (4), 1269–1293 (2017)
C. Kuo et al., Pilot findings of brain displacements and deformations during roller coaster rides. J. Neurotrauma 34 (22), 3198–3205 (2017)
M.A. Fard, T. Ishihara, H. Inooka, Dynamics of the head-neck complex in response to the trunk horizontal vibration: modeling and identification. J. Biomech. Eng. 125 (4), 533–539 (2003)
C. Kuo et al., Passive cervical spine ligaments provide stability during head impacts. J. R. Soc. Interface 16 (154), 20190086 (2019)
P.C. Ivancic et al., Intervertebral neck injury criterion for simulated frontal impacts. Traffic Inj. Prev. 6 (2), 175–184 (2005)
S.M. Coffeng et al., Patients with mild traumatic brain injury and acute neck pain at the emergency department are a distinct category within the mTBI spectrum: a prospective multicentre cohort study. BMC Neurol. 20 (1), 315 (2020)
Download references
This work has been funded by the Force Health Protection (FHP) program through the Office of Naval Research (ONR) (Award # N00014-21-1-2750, N00014-21-1-2043, N00014-21-1-2051, N00014-20-1-2814, N00014-19-1-2383, N00014-18-1-2082, N00014-16-1-2142—Dr. Timothy Bentley, Program Manager) and PANTHER program (Award # N00014-21-1-2855 (0000001556), https://www.panther.engr.wisc.edu/ )
The funding has been received from Office of Naval Research with Grant nos. N00014-21-1-2051, N00014-21-1-2043, N00014-21-1-2750, N00014-20-1-2814, N00014-19-1-2383, N00014-18-1-2082, N00014-16-1-2142, N00014-21-1-2855 (PANTHER Program).
Authors and affiliations.
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
Rahid Zaman, Md Navid Imtiaz Rifat, Fairuz Maliha, Md Nahian Bin Hossain, Raisa Akhtaruzzaman & Ashfaq Adnan
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Ashfaq Adnan .
Conflict of interest.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Acronym | Meaning | Definition |
---|---|---|
AAD | Acute Axonal Degeneration | Abrupt and severe damage to neurons, characterized by rapid disintegration of the axon |
AFM | Atomic Force Microscopy | Precise high-resolution imaging method employed to observe surfaces at the atomic level |
AP | Action Potential | Nerve impulse that traverses through neurons to maintain neuronal communication |
CSDM | Cumulative Strain Damage Measure | Theoretical framework employed to measure the total damage inflicted as a result of repetitive or cyclic loading |
CSF | Cerebrospinal Fluid | Transparent and colorless bodily fluid present in the central nervous system, preserving brain health and functionality |
DAI | Diffuse Axonal Injury | A type of TBI occurring due to the shearing force between the grey and white matters, resulting from quick and sudden movement of brain tissue |
ECM | Extracellular Matrix | An intricate network of macromolecules that offers both structural and biochemical support to the adjacent cells in tissues |
FAS | Focal Axonal Swelling | An altered morphology characterized by localized bleb formations along the length of an axon |
FEM | Finite Element Method | A frequently utilized numerical technique for tackling intricate problems by partitioning the problem domain into a finite number of subdomains (elements) |
GAMBIT | Generalized Acceleration Model for Brain Injury Threshold | A concept utilized in the injury biomechanics field to construct quantitative thresholds for TBI using characteristics such as acceleration, deceleration, and angular velocity |
GFAP | Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein | A major structural component in astrocytes that maintain functioning and integrity of the central nervous system |
HIC | Head Injury Criterion | A metric quantifying the severity of head impact by analyzing the head's linear acceleration-time history during the incident |
HIP | Head Injury Power | The energy delivered to the head during a collision, especially in automotive crash testing and helmet regulations, offering insights regarding the extent of brain damage |
ICP | Intracranial Pressure | Pressure exerted on the brain tissue by the CSF within the skull |
MAP2 | Microtubule Associated Protein-2 | Provides crucial functions in the regulation of microtubule structure and function in neurons |
MBP | Myelin Basic Protein | A major structural component expressed by oligodendrocytes/Schwann cells that preserves the structure and functionality of myelin |
MCSFP | Minimum of Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure | The average pressure exerted by the CSF within the central nervous system |
MD | Molecular Dynamics | A computational method employed to investigate the temporal behavior of atoms and molecules, offering valuable insights of the configuration, dynamics, and energy properties of molecules at the atomic scale |
MT | Microtubule | Tubular structures associated with neuronal physiology, contributing to neuronal morphogenesis, intracellular transport, synaptic function, structural integrity, and plasticity |
mTBI | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Concussions or chronic cognitive dysfunctions resulting from head injury |
PAC | Pia-arachnoid Complex | A thin and fragile membrane, consisting of two layers: the pia mater and the arachnoid mater, that envelops the brain and spinal cord |
PNN | Perineural Net | Specific ECM formations that enclose particular neurons in the central nervous system, composed of an intricate matrix of proteins and carbohydrates |
PRHIC | Power Rotational Head Injury Criteria | Quantitative measures employed to evaluate the likelihood of brain injury caused by rotational acceleration forces encountered during a collision |
RIC | Rotational Injury Criteria | |
TBI | Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury caused to the brain due to severe impacts (blunt/ballistic/penetrating) or neurodegenerative diseases |
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Zaman, R., Rifat, M.N.I., Maliha, F. et al. Multiscale Structure of Brain and Challenges in Traumatic Brain Injury Risk Prediction. Multiscale Sci. Eng. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-024-00117-7
Download citation
Received : 12 February 2024
Revised : 08 August 2024
Accepted : 21 August 2024
Published : 09 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42493-024-00117-7
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Learn how to craft the golden thread of research: the research aims, objectives and questions for your dissertation, thesis or research project. See examples, tips and criteria for each element and how they align with your research design and methodology.
Learn how to write a research question that is focused, specific, and relevant to your topic and research problem. See examples of qualitative, quantitative, and statistical research questions, and how to avoid common pitfalls.
Learn how to write a research question that is focused, researchable, feasible, specific, complex, and relevant to your topic and field. See examples of different types of research questions and how to use sub-questions to guide your research.
Aims and Objectives - Guide for Thesis and Dissertations
A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative ...
Research Question Examples & Ideas: The ULTIMATE List
Learn what a research question is, how it differs from a research aim, and how to write a high-quality research question. Explore the four types of research questions and see examples of each type.
A good research question is essential to guide your research paper, dissertation, or thesis. All research questions should be: Focused on a single problem or issue. Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources. Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints. Specific enough to answer thoroughly.
This step in your research journey is usually the first written method used to convey your research idea to your tutor. Therefore, aims and objectives should clearly convey your topic, academic foundation, and research design. In order to write effective research aims and objectives, researchers should consider all aspects of their proposed work.
How to Write a Research Question in 2024: Types, Steps, ...
Research Objectives | Definition & Examples
How to Write a Research Question: Types and Examples
Examples of good research questions
This paper has briefly outlined how to articulate research questions, formulate your aims, and choose your research methods. It is crucial to realize that articulating a good research question involves considerable iteration through the stages described above. It is very common that the first research question generated bears little resemblance ...
Formulating Research Aims and Objectives
What Are Research Objectives and How to Write Them ...
Setting a research question, aim and objective
A qualitative research question is a type of systematic inquiry that aims at collecting qualitative data from research subjects. The aim of qualitative research questions is to gather non-statistical information pertaining to the experiences, observations, and perceptions of the research subjects in line with the objectives of the investigation.
Research Aims and Objectives: The dynamic duo for ...
Research questions, hypotheses and objectives - PMC
Once a topic of interest develops into a research question, the next step is to ponder the closely linked aims and objectives. A study's aim is its overall purpose-its planned long-term accomplishments and goals. According to Newman et al. 14, there are nine types (Table 18.1).Research objectives are slightly more specific than aims and may be subdivided into primary (must be achieved) and ...
Aim: To understand the contribution that local governments make to national level energy policy. Objectives: Conduct a survey of local politicians to solicit responses. Conduct desk-research of local government websites to create a database of local energy policy.
This study aims to assist Spanish authorities in enhancing the prevention of negative attitudes towards immigrants by addressing two key questions derived from prior research by the authors: (1) Which variables consistently influence attitudes towards migration over time? (2) What are the distinct attitudinal differences among various groups?
What's the difference between research aims and objectives?
This study aims to provide an overview of the recent developments in understanding multiscale traumatic brain injury (TBI) mechanisms from a multidisciplinary perspective. TBI is a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting people of all ages, genders, and races. On average, in every 5 s, someone in the U.S. experiences TBI-related injuries. According to the CDC, in ...